200 likes | 351 Views
From Drop-in to Doctorate: flexibility as a principle for credit-bearing CPD. Nicola Reimann and Liz McDowell (Northumbria University) & Participants of the Academic Practice Programme: Linda Allin Richard Buckley Julia Charlton Joanne Smailes Teri Taylor Alison Venis Cath White.
E N D
From Drop-in to Doctorate: flexibility as a principle for credit-bearing CPD Nicola Reimann and Liz McDowell (Northumbria University) & Participants of the Academic Practice Programme: Linda Allin Richard Buckley Julia Charlton Joanne Smailes Teri Taylor Alison Venis Cath White
Overview of paper • Overview of Northumbria Academic Practice Programme • Key aspects of flexibility • Participants’ experiences • Problems of flexibility
Northumbria Academic Practice Programme • Since 2005/6 • Suite of PG modules • Free-standing professional development OR • Credit-bearing study • Suite of PG awards • PGCert • PGDip • MA • ProfDoc • Paid for by institution
Underpinning principles • Flexibility • Scholarship of Teaching and Learning • Relevance to work • Collaboration and networking • Career development
Inclusivity • For everyone who teaches and/or supports students • Collaboration • Across Schools and Services • Across roles • Diverse teaching team
Richard Buckley Students’ UnionRepresentation and Democracy Coordinator
Range of opportunities • Informal → formal • Practice development → pedagogic research • Open session → module → award • Suite of awards • Drawing on provision across university
Recognition of prior learning and achievements • AP(E)L • Against module learning outcomes • Against programme learning outcomes • Recognition • PGCert in HE L&T • Master’s in Education
Responding to university strategies • Research-informed Teaching Initiative • ‘The Link between Teaching & Research’ module • Student Well-being Strategy & Duty of Care • ‘Guiding and Supporting Students’ module • Assessment for Learning in L&T Strategy • ‘Assessment for Learning’ module • Promotions scheme • ‘Constructing an Academic Practice Portfolio’ module • Work-based modules to address emerging issues
Alison Venis, Project Officer,Research-informed Teaching Initiatives
Relevance to practice • Link to work • Ownership • Impact • Work-based modules • ProfDoc
Assessment • Double use • Negotiable submission formats • Multiple deadlines • ‘Statement of CPD activity’ • Doctorate: • Thesis • Portfolio
Problems arising from flexibility • Clash with standard delivery, assessment and admin systems • Administration much more complex • Logistics of linking to other development opportunities within institution • Participants: • Workload issues • Progression less clear • Complexity of AP(E)L process
Questions for discussion • What do you think: should credit-bearing professional development programmes be as flexible as possible? Why? • How flexible is the credit-bearing programme at your institution? • Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages (or vice-versa)? • How could your programme be made more flexible? • What problems might arise from making it more flexible?