160 likes | 288 Views
Early Detection of Invasive Fishes in Lake Superior. Outline. Thunder Bay. Development of an AIS monitoring program Theory behind detecting rare species Cooperative monitoring efforts M onitoring program evaluation Recent progress in Lake Superior. St. Louis River. Upper St. Marys.
E N D
Outline Thunder Bay • Development of an AIS monitoring program • Theory behind detecting rare species • Cooperative monitoring efforts • Monitoring program evaluation • Recent progress in Lake Superior St. Louis River Upper St. Marys
A threat to the ecosystem Continual threat of new invasions • Coordinated Science and Monitoring Initiative • Lake Superior Aquatic Invasive Species Comp. Prevention Plan • Lake Superior Lakewide Management Plan • Lake Superior Fish Community Objectives (2003)
Developing a Monitoring Program 2005-2007 in St. Louis River Estuary Trebitz et al. (2009) Exploiting habitat and gear patterns for efficient detection of rare and non-native benthos and fish in Great Lakes coastal ecosystems. Aquatic Invasions. Goal is early detection!
Species Accumulation Presence/Absence • Only need to detect one • Non-detection does not equate to non-presence • Common species are easy to detect • Much effort is required to detect the rarest species Rare species Many samples Common species Few samples
Experimental Sampling • 2010-2012, August-September • Random allocation of sample locations
Electrofishing Fyke Netting Trawling
Electrofishing Fyke Netting Trawling
Electrofishing Fyke Netting Trawling
Non-Natives Detected Thunder Bay (135 samples) Total Richness = 37 Alewife Common carp Eurasian ruffe Fourspinestickleback Rainbow smelt Round goby Tubenose goby Threespine stickleback St. Louis River (150 samples) Total Richness = 39 Alewife Brook silverside Common carp Eurasian ruffe Freshwater Drum Rainbow smelt Round goby Tubenose goby Threespine stickleback White perch Upper St. Marys(135 samples) Total Richness = 36 Alewife Brook silverside Rainbow smelt Threespine stickleback
Gear mixtures to maximize richness? St. Louis River Upper St. Marys Thunder Bay • Randomly selected 0, 2, 4, …, 20 fyke net records and added 0, 2, 4, …, 20 electrofishing and 0, 2, 4, …, 20 trawl records to reach a total of 20 stations (66 possible gear combinations) • Plotted mean richness from 10 random draws of each gear combination
Rarefaction St. Louis River Upper St. Marys River Thunder Bay (EstimateS software)
Estimated Species Richness Parameters: total fish, singletons, doubletons (EstimateS) Chao et al. (2009) Sufficient sampling for asymptotic minimum species richness estimators. Ecology Hoffman et al. (2011) Effort and potential efficiencies for aquatic non-native species early detection. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Summary of Evaluation • Multi-gear approach • 40% Fyke Nets, 40% Electrofishing, 20% Trawls • Effort requirements for 95% detections ~ Met with 3 years of effort • Substantial effort for 100% • Great community survey We have an effective AIS monitoring program!
2013 Progress in Lake Superior • St. Louis, Upper St. Marys, Thunder Bay • Added Chequamegon Bay, WI and Lower St. MarysRiver • Other locations throughout Great Lakes • St. Louis River larval fish • Chequamegon Bay invertebrates • Isle Royale fish and intertebrates (2012)