1 / 26

Glenn Meyers, FCAS, PhD ISO Innovative Analytics

Testing Models on Simulated Data Presented at the Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar September 19, 2008. Glenn Meyers, FCAS, PhD ISO Innovative Analytics. The Application Estimating Loss Reserves. Given a triangle of incremental paid losses

mendenhall
Download Presentation

Glenn Meyers, FCAS, PhD ISO Innovative Analytics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Testing Models on Simulated DataPresented at the Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar September 19, 2008 Glenn Meyers, FCAS, PhD ISO Innovative Analytics

  2. The ApplicationEstimating Loss Reserves • Given a triangle of incremental paid losses • Ten years with 55 observations arranged by accident year and settlement lag • Estimate the distribution of the sum of the remaining 45 accident years/settlement lags • Loss reserve models typically have many parameters • Examples in this presentation – 9 parameters

  3. Danger – Possible Overfitting! • Model describes the sample, but not the population • Understates the range of results • The range is the goal! • Is overfitting a problem with loss reserve models? • If so, what do we do about it?

  4. Outline • Illustrate overfitting with a simple example • Example – fit a normal distribution with three observations • Illustrate graphically the effects overfitting • Illustrate overfitting with a loss reserve model • Reasonably good loss reserve model • Show similar graphical effects as normal example

  5. Normal Distribution • MLE for parameters m and s • n = 3 in these examples

  6. Simulation Testing Strategy • Select 3 observations at random Population - m = 1000, s = 500 • Predict a normal distribution using the maximum likelihood estimator • Select 1,000 additional observations at random from the same population • Compare distribution of additional observations with the predicted distribution

  7. Simulated Fits

  8. PP Plots Plot Predicted Percentiles x Uniform Percentiles • If predicted percentiles are uniformly distributed, the plot should be a 45o line.

  9. PP Plots

  10. Simulated Fits

  11. View Maximum Likelihood As an Estimation Strategy • If you estimate distributions by maximum likelihood repeatedly, how well do you do in the aggregate? • Consider a space of possible parameters for a model • Select parameters at random • Select a sample for estimation (training) • Select a sample for post-estimation (testing)

  12. Continuing Prior Slide • Select parameters at random • Select a sample for estimation (training) • Select a sample for post-estimation (testing) • Fit a model for each training sample • Calculate the predicted percentiles of the testing sample. • Combine for all samples. • In the aggregate, the predicted percentiles should be uniformly distributed.

  13. PP Plots for Normal Distribution (n = 3) S-Shaped PP Plot - Tails are too light!

  14. Problem – How to Fit Distribution? • Proposed solution – Bayesian Analysis • Likelihood = Pr{Data|Model} • We need Pr{Model|Data} for each model in the prior

  15. Predictive distributions are spread out more than the MLE’s. On individual fits, they do not always match the testing data. Bayesian Fits

  16. Parameters of model were selected at random from the prior distribution Near perfect uniform distribution of predicted percentiles At least in this example, the Bayesian strategy does not overfit. Bayesian Fits as a Strategy Combined PP Plot for Bayesian Fitting Strategy

  17. Analyze Overfitting in Loss Reserve Formulas • Many candidate formulas - Pick a good one • Paid LossAY,Lag ~ Collective Risk Model • Claim count distribution is negative binomial • Claim severity distribution is Pareto • Claim severity increases with settlement lag • Calculate likelihood using FFT

  18. Simulation Testing Strategy • Select triangles of data at random • Payment pattern at random • ELR at random • {Loss|Expected Loss} for each cell in the triangle from Collective Risk Model • Randomly select outcomes using the same payment pattern and ELR • Evaluate the Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian fitting methodology with PP plots.

  19. Background on Formula • Fit a Bayesian model to over 100 insurers and produced an “acceptable” combined PP plot on test data from six years later. • This paper tests the approach to simulated data, rather than real data.

  20. Prior Payout Patterns

  21. Prior Probabilities for ELR

  22. Selected Individual Estimates

  23. PP plot reveals the S-shape that characterizes overfitting. The tails are too light Maximum Likelihood Fitting MethodologyPP Plots for Combined Fits

  24. Bayesian Fitting MethodologyPP Plots for Combined Fits Nailed the Tails

  25. Summary • Examples illustrate the effect of overfitting • Bayesian approach provides a solution • These examples are based on simulated data, with the advantage that the “prior” is known. • Previous paper extracted prior distributions from maximum likelihood estimates of similar claims of other insurers

  26. Conclusion • It is not enough to know if assumptions are correct. • To avoid the light tails that arise from overfitting, one has to get information that is: Outside The Triangle

More Related