200 likes | 349 Views
The Choice among Acquisitions, Alliances, and Divestitures. Author: Villalonga , B. and McGahan , A . Strategic Management Journal, 26 (13): 1183-1208. Presented by Nan Zhang. About the Authors. Belén Villalonga Leonard N. Stern School of Business, NYU
E N D
The Choice among Acquisitions, Alliances, and Divestitures Author:Villalonga, B. and McGahan, A. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (13): 1183-1208. Presented by Nan Zhang
About the Authors BelénVillalonga • Leonard N. Stern School of Business, NYU • Associate Professor of Management and Organizations • Ph.D., Economic and Management Sciences, 2000 (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) • Ph.D., Management, 2001 (UCLA) Anita M. McGahan • School of Management, Boston University • Visiting Professor of Strategy and Innovation • Ph.D., Business Economics, 1990 (Harvard University)
Overview • Introduction • Determinants of Boundary Choice • Data • Theory, Hypotheses, and Results • Conclusion
Introduction • Earlier empirical studies of boundary choice look at: • Alternative governance structure (transaction focus); • Choices that firms make between acquisitions and alliances (firm focus); • Joint decisions by two or more firms to ally (dyad). • Motivation: Lack of studies about selling (divestitures) vs. buying or making (acquisitions). • Divestitures, alliance and acquisitions can fit into the three groups defined by earlier studies. • Transaction: Divestitures and acquisitions both represent reactions to changes in the transaction costs created by specialized assets. • Firm: Divestitures and alliance are alternative ways to contract boundaries, just as acquisitions and alliances are alternative way to expand boundaries. • Dyad: Divestitures are a way of allocating control of resources between parties. • Objective: Examine how firms choose among acquisitions, alliances, and destitution when deciding to expand or contract boundaries.
Acquisition, Alliance and Divestiture Low Integration High Integration
Data • 9,276 acquisitions, alliances, and divestitures announced and completed by 86 members of the Fortune 100 between 1990 and 2000 • Data are from the SDC (Joint Ventures and Alliances; Mergers and Acquisitions). • Deal types grouped into three, seven, and nine categories for refined analysis. • Dependent variable: governance form
Additional ResultsBoundary-expanding and boundary-contracting forms
Conclusion • Supports are founded by findings. • The combined RBV, TCE and internationalization theory is supported. • Agency theory also finds mixed support in the results. • The study provides strong support for organizational learning explanations. • Results imply that a multi-theoretical approach is needed to study firms’ boundary choices • Limitations • Emphasis on the Fortune 100 firms • Validation of proxies (i.e., governance form specialization, recency of same-form experience)? • Future research • Alliances vs. divestitures (boundary-contracting choices) • Exploration of organizational learning explanations