150 likes | 246 Views
2009 IEEE NPSS Member Survey. Process. Survey conducted on SurveyMonkey.com 2 months at $19.95 + $3.80 in response charges Email addresses 3183 email addresses of active members 7 bad 35 previously opted out 68 bounced Announcement email from Craig on 6/10 Survey period: 6/10-7/10
E N D
Process • Survey conducted on SurveyMonkey.com • 2 months at $19.95 + $3.80 in response charges • Email addresses • 3183 email addresses of active members • 7 bad • 35 previously opted out • 68 bounced • Announcement email from Craig on 6/10 • Survey period: 6/10-7/10 • 3 Reminder Emails (6/18, 6/25, 7/6) • Response • 26 opted out • 1335 responded • 1269 full responses (answered all questions)
Survey • 44 Questions • 8 Sections • Field of Interest (2) • Society/Professional Activities (10) • Transactions on Nuclear Science (8) • Transactions on Plasma Science (10) • Newsletter (10) • Demographics (4)
Results: Field of Interest • Unweighted: In which Technical Areas do you have a significant interest? You may select multiple areas of interest. • Weighted: For each technical field which you selected as being an area of interest in Question 1, please provide a relative rating of your level of interest with 10 being high and 0 being no interest. The sum should equal 10 points. (sum=10 enforced post facto)
Results: Societies • 77% are not involved in voluteer activities • 235 provided some information related to volunteering • 17% involved in section or chapter activities • 59% belong to non-IEEE socieities • APS (275), SNM(87), SPIE(60), AAPM(55), ANS(40), AAAS(35), Sigma Xi (30), MRS (28), AIAA (26), IOP (21) • 17% do not want to receive email from NPSS • 15% do not want to receive email from technical committee
Results: Website 91 comments related to improving NPSS website 61 comments related to improving technical committee website
Results: TNS • 76% read, review or contribute articles to TNS • 88% feel needs for technical information are being met • 72% would like to see more application-oriented papers • 79% would like to see more review papers • 127 comments related to improving TNS
Results: TNS • Quality: 78% say high (59%) or very high (19%) • Speed: 70% say fast (26%) or moderate (44%) • Comparison to other journals: • Most have no opinion • Physics/engineering: Better or same • Medical/Imaging: Same or worse
Results: TPS • 40% read, review or contribute articles to TPS • 88% say needs are being met • 67% would like more application-oriented papers • 82% would like more review papers • 49 made comments for improving TPS
Results: TPS • Quality: Very High (17%), High (55%), Medium (21%) • Speed: Fast (28%), Medium (43%) • 179 provided information about other journals they read • 152 provided comparisons with these journals
Results: Newsletter • 71% read newsletter • 258 provided information about what they like best • 113 provided information about what they like least • Meets needs for information about NPSS activities and opportunities: 85% • 61% would like more information about conferences • 75% would like more overview articles • 62% do not want more articles about member activities • Quality: High (51%) or Medium (40%)
Results: Conferences ICOPS: 19% PPC: 12% PAC: 7% NSREC: 23% NSS/MIC: 47% RTC: 3.5% SOFE: 2.8%
Results: Conferences ICOPS: 24% PPC: 18% PAC: 15% NSREC: 30% NSS/MIC: 30% RTC: 9% SOFE: 11%
Results: Location US: 64%, Europe: 24%, Asia: 7%