1 / 20

Identification of Sural Nociceptive flexion reflex Ratio in adult Males 20-40 years of age

Thien Ngo MD PGY – 4 UK PM&R 5/23/2013 Advisors: Drs. Lumy Sawaki & Oscar Ortiz . Identification of Sural Nociceptive flexion reflex Ratio in adult Males 20-40 years of age . Outline. Introduction Objectives Experimental Design Method Results References . Introduction 1.

metta
Download Presentation

Identification of Sural Nociceptive flexion reflex Ratio in adult Males 20-40 years of age

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Thien Ngo MD PGY – 4 UK PM&R 5/23/2013 Advisors: Drs. LumySawaki & Oscar Ortiz Identification of SuralNociceptive flexion reflex Ratio in adult Males 20-40 years of age

  2. Outline • Introduction • Objectives • Experimental Design • Method • Results • References

  3. Introduction 1 • Pain is a subjective experience, and its measurement has been traditionally based on self reported instruments. • Absence of objective instruments • Quantitative sensory testing and nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) threshold have been explored as options to measure pain more objectively

  4. Introduction 2 • NFR in theory • The NFR is a polysynaptic spinal reflex subserving withdrawal from potentially noxious stimuli. • Provide indirect evidence of supraspinal modulation • The higher the threshold the more inhibition of spinal nociceptive transmission

  5. Introduction 3 • NFR threshold is defined by the lowest noxious stimulation intensity required to trigger a reflex motor response in the biceps femoris muscle.

  6. Introduction 4 Central hyperexcitability as measured with nociceptive flexor reflex threshold in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. Lim EC, Sterling M, Stone A, Vicenzino B. Pain. 2011 Aug;152(8):1811-20. Epub 2011 Apr 27

  7. Introduction 5 • Promising results in multiples experimental studies. • Reliable, reproducible, and correlated well with clinical findings within subjects • Significant variability between subjects, despite efforts for standardization, makes it unsuitable for clinical use or establishment of normal values.

  8. Introduction 6 Sural SNAP amplitude using NFRT stimulus NFRI = x 100 Sural SNAP amplitude (supramaximal) • Propose alternative standardized method to measure NFR that avoid variability (mostly due to changes in skin resistance).

  9. Objectives • The goal of this pilot study is to begin to establish normative data of NFRI in young male adults. Our proposed study has 2 specific aims: • Specific Aim #1:Identify the “normal” suralnociceptive flexion reflex threshold (NRFT) and the suralnociceptive flexion reflex ratio (NFRR) in male adults of 20 to 40 years of age. • Specific Aim #2:Measure the correlation between the NFRI and level of pain as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

  10. Experimental Design • Recruitment: Flyers and volunteer subjects • Screening process and informed consent • Inclusion Criteria: • Healthy male 20-40 • Exclusion Criteria: • Avoiding confounding factors of NFR and NFRT recording • Head injury, alcohol/drug abuse, psychiatric illness, on psychiatric/pain medications, neurological disorder, chronic pain, h/o cancer, and peripheral neuropathy

  11. Method (Step 1) (Sural sensory nerve action potential)

  12. EMG Machine

  13. Method (Step 2) (Nociceptive Flexion Reflex)

  14. EMG machine - Biceps Femoris Reflex

  15. Graph 1: Subject by Subject Responses: biceps reflex, pain index, and NFRR Graph 1. Pain index and NFRR showed a closed correlation with subject 1, 2, 4, 6, & 7. There was no significant correlation between pain and biceps reflex intensity.

  16. Graph 2: Correlation between pain index vs biceps reflex Graph 2. Biceps Reflex (mA) vs Pain Index showed 59% correlation

  17. Graph 3: Pain index vs NFRR Graph 3. Lack of a correlation between pain index and NFRR

  18. Conclusion/Discussion: • No significant findings • Variability • Take away points • Revise gold standard • Minimal threshold for SNAP • Standard stimulus for pain index

  19. References • 1.) Giorgio, S. et al. “The lower limb flexion reflex in humans”. (2005) Progress in Neurobiology 77: 353-395. • 2.) Rhudy, J. & France, C. “Defining the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) threshold in human participants: A comparison of different scoring criteria”. (2007) Pain 128: 244-253. • 3.) France, C. et al. “Using normalized EMG to define the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) threshold: Further evaluation of standardized NFR scoring criteria”. (2009) Pain 145: 211-218. • 4.) Terry, E. et al. “Standardizing procedures to study sensitization of human spinal nociceptiveprocesses: Comparing parameters for temporal summation of the nociceptiveflexionreflex (TS-NFR)”. (2011) International Journal of Psychophysiology 81: 263-274. • 5.) Micalos, P. et al. “Reliability of the nociceptive flexor reflex (RIII) threshold and association with Pain threshold”. (2009) Eur J ApplPhysio 105: 55-62.

  20. Thank you!

More Related