70 likes | 82 Views
Stacked evidence is a fallacy that presents only one side of an issue, distorting the argument by ignoring counterevidence. Examples include biased TV programming and one-sided resumes. While one-sided arguments can have merit in certain contexts, incorporating both sides of an argument makes it more persuasive and allows the audience to make informed decisions.
E N D
Rhetorical Fallacy : Stacked Evidence What is a Fallacy? A mistaken belief based on an unsound argument.
Stacked Evidence • Represents only one side of the issue, thus distorting the it. • Also known as ignoring the counterevidence, slanting, or a one-sided assessment. • The more/stronger the evidence that is withheld, the more fallacious the argument.
Examples.. • Watching TV is beneficial because it offers PBS, the news, and The History Channel. • There is no mention of violence, sex or shows like the Kardashians. (Which have no benefit).
Examples… • Resumes are a classic example of stacking evidence in your favor. A resume can been seen as an argument to why you are qualified for the job. • Most employers are wise enough to know that resumes are one-sided, and look for more evidence in the form of interviews and recommendations to make a decision.
Examples… • The stereotypical “used car salesmen” stack the evidence by raving about a car’s reliability. • After you decide to buy the car they may turn around and try to sell you the extended warranty (telling you little things that could go wrong).
One Sided Arguments Are Not Always Bad • It is by no means always wrong to present a one-sided argument . We have to take the context of the argument into consideration. • Example: A trial attorney presents a one-sided case in favor of a client. It is not a defense attorney's job to present the evidence for the defendant's guilt, rather that is the job of the prosecutor.
Reasons to Avoid Stacked Evidence • Your argument will be much more persuasive if you present and “shoot down” the opposing sides evidence. • Audience will be able to make an informed decision if you incorporate both sides of your argument.