140 likes | 223 Views
Statistical association of genotype and phenotype. Linkage map. Fig. 3 in Collard et al. Euphytica (2005) 142: 169–196. Linkage map. Fig. 7 in Collard et al. Euphytica (2005) 142: 169–196. Association between genotype and phenotype. Fig. 9 in Collard et al. Euphytica (2005) 142: 169–196.
E N D
Linkage map Fig. 3 in Collard et al. Euphytica (2005) 142: 169–196
Linkage map Fig. 7 in Collard et al. Euphytica (2005) 142: 169–196
Association between genotype and phenotype Fig. 9 in Collard et al. Euphytica (2005) 142: 169–196
Single marker analysis • Using e.g., ANOVA, regression • However, can’t distinguish between effect size and distance between marker and QTL
Interval mapping • Uses multiple markers at a time • Uses flanking marker genotypess to infer probability of genotype at intervals between the markers • Associates probability of genotype with phenotype
Association between genotype and phenotype • Linear regression
Association between genotype and phenotype • Maximum likelihood LOD score = log(maximum likelihood with a QTL) maximum likelihood without a QTL
Selective genotyping • Genotyping is expensive and time consuming • May be more efficient to genotype only the most phenotypically extreme individuals Darvasi and Soller 1992, Theor Appl Genet 85: 353-359
Selective genotyping • Genotyping is expensive and time consuming • May be more efficient to genotype only the most phenotypically extreme individuals • Selective genotyping may reduce power to resolve linked QTL • Selective genotyping may affect estimates of QTL effect size
Beavis effect • Small sample sizes may lead to overestimation of QTL effect sizes