1 / 6

NEEDED IMPROVEMENTS IN THE FACULTY HANDBOOK FORMAT

NEEDED IMPROVEMENTS IN THE FACULTY HANDBOOK FORMAT. Report to General Faculty Dec. 2, 2003. Other Committee Members Jim Cofer – GTRI Russell Gentry – Arch Exec. Bd. Liaison George Johnson – Arch E. W. Looney – student Jonathan Moore – OTL Tim Strike – GTRI.

michaelsparker
Download Presentation

NEEDED IMPROVEMENTS IN THE FACULTY HANDBOOK FORMAT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NEEDED IMPROVEMENTS IN THE FACULTY HANDBOOK FORMAT Report to General FacultyDec. 2, 2003 • Other Committee Members • Jim Cofer – GTRI • Russell Gentry – ArchExec. Bd. Liaison • George Johnson – Arch • E. W. Looney – student • Jonathan Moore – OTL • Tim Strike – GTRI Ron Bohlander, ChairStatutes Committee(404) 894-3836 Fax (404) 894-1817E-mail: ron.bohlander@gtri.gatech.edu

  2. PROBLEMS • Our handbook sections are numbered to an excessive depth – it looks silly • Html version of the Handbook is not easily read. Insufficient white space between sections.

  3. EXAMPLE OF EXCESSIVEOUTLINE DEPTH

  4. EXAMPLE OF WEBSITE READABILITY PROBLEM

  5. ADDITIONAL ISSUES • Information on a given topic can be spread out through the handbook. • We do not yet take full advantage of hyperlinking and indexing. • Good examples at other universities have a more dignified appearance, utilizing attractive headers and modest use of color. • Accessibility standards are not consistently followed and should be.

  6. PROPOSED STEPS TOWARDS IMPROVEMENT • Study a cross-section of Faculty Handbooks at peer institutions (by December) • Derive a specification based on our needs and on best practices (by January) • Create one or more prototypes by transforming the current text to a new format. (by February) • Include hyperlinks in the web form (by March) • Include an index if practical (by March) • Create if possible, modular views (by March) • Present recommendation to GFA/Senate Apr. 20, 2004 • Format change only – no content change. • During this process, call attention to inconsistencies and assist in resolving them.

More Related