1 / 20

On the use of the GPCI for the tuning and the validation of the new ARPEGE GCM’s physics

GCSS-GPCI / BLCL-RICO 18-21 sept 2006. On the use of the GPCI for the tuning and the validation of the new ARPEGE GCM’s physics. P. Marquet, CNRM . Toulouse . Météo-France. + ARPEGE CLIMATE & N.W.P. team + Meso-Scale CNRM team + ENM (School of Met.) + CERFACS + IPSL-LMD ….

michi
Download Presentation

On the use of the GPCI for the tuning and the validation of the new ARPEGE GCM’s physics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GCSS-GPCI / BLCL-RICO 18-21 sept 2006 On the use of the GPCI for the tuning and the validation of the new ARPEGE GCM’s physics P. Marquet,CNRM. Toulouse. Météo-France. + ARPEGE CLIMATE & N.W.P. team + Meso-Scale CNRM team + ENM (School of Met.) + CERFACS + IPSL-LMD … (20-sept-2006)

  2. Introduction The aim of the study : • Run the French Météo-France (CNRM) ARPEGE-CLIMAT GCM (T63-L31) for GEWEX-PCI (STD / NEW1 / NEW2) … • Send the results for the inter-comparison : done / Joao … + Impact studies : • Test of STANDARD versus NEW physics (Turb, Conv,-Phys) • Comparisons with the previous EPCI ; with the AMMA-CI… • Impact of the explicit Top PBL entrainment ? • Comparisons with SCM cases ?

  3. The Climate ARPEGE physics : STANDARD / NEW1 / NEW2 STANDARD / V3-V4 NEW1 / mixed / NEW2 / IPCC / full-Diagnostic Diag+Prog full-Prognostic TURB DIAG. Mellor-Yamada DIAG. M&Y PROGN. / C.B.R.  e /  t = 0  e /  t = 0  e /  t = P + Dif – Dis moist PDF / Bougeault moist PDF / moist PDF / Bougeault Bougeault / Bechtold Micro-Phys DIAG. PROGN. PROGN. Smith/Kessler Smith/Kessler Bulk - Lopez q_liq / q_i ce q_liq / q_ice q_cloud / q_rain Shallow part in TURB , but why ? Mass-Flux Mass-Flux Convection + Mass-Flux Bougeault ? CAPE / Germy CAPE / Gueremy Deep Mass-Flux / Bougeault Mass-Flux Mass-Flux Convection Convergence of HU CAPE / Gueremy CAPE / Gueremy Top-PBL NO YES YES Entrainment Grenier & Breth. Grenier & Breth.

  4. Equator GPCI =GewexPacificCross-sectionIntercomparison U.S.A Sc/St 1st Cross Section Cu 2nd Cross Section Cb GCM runs Arpege / V4.5 : 2 years : 1998 and 2003 10 days of spin-up in June (lost) + JJA every 3 h NEW1 : TKE-GY + -phys-GY + CVGY + LPBLE / or not NEW2 : TKE-CBR + LOPEZ + CVGY + LPBLE / or not

  5. (b) L.W.P. (a) I.W.V. (c) C. C. (diag) (diag) Versus : SCM / EUROCS Cumulus (L40) EPCI =EurocsPacificCross-sectionIntercomparison

  6. ECMWF Arpege MPI JMA MetO RACMO HIRLAM KF HIRLAM ST ERA (3-6h) EPCI =EurocsPacificCross-sectionIntercomparison Cloud Cover

  7. ARPEGE-V3 Met-Office ANA-ECMWF Cloud Cover EPCI =EurocsPacificCross-sectionIntercomparison

  8. ARP-NEW2 + LPBLE ANA-ECMWF ARPEGE-V3 ARP-V4-STD Cloud Cover GPCI =GewexPacificCross-sectionIntercomparison

  9. ARP-NEW2 ANA-ECMWF 800 900 1000 ARP-NEW2 + LPBLE GPCI =GewexPacificCross-sectionIntercomparison Cloud Cover More realistic results with NEW2 + LPBLE : Top-PBL Entrainment = OK  RICO ?

  10. NEW2 NEW2_noent RICO L31 (GCM) Cloud Cover

  11. More realistic results with NEW2 (+ LPBLE) ARP-NEW2 + LPBLE ARP-NEW2 GPCI =GewexPacificCross-sectionIntercomparison ARP-STD Athens (2005) : Pb OMEGA (Pa/s) !!

  12. No more >0 biases with NEW2… but a <0 one !!   RICO ? GPCI ARP-STD ARP-NEW2 + LPBLE (b) .W.P. GPCI =GewexPacificCross-sectionIntercomparison <q_vap> V4 = ARP-STD K6 = ARP-NEW2 K4 = ARP-NEW2 + LPBLE EPCI I.W.V.

  13. STD NEW2 NEW2_noent [ T ] & [ q_v ] => [ RH  ]? RICO L31 (GCM) RELAT. HUM.

  14. NEW2 : better than STD-V4 NEW2 with LPBLE even better… GPCI ARP-STD ARP-NEW2 + LPBLE ARP-NEW2 ARP-NEW2 + LPBLE GPCI =GewexPacificCross-sectionIntercomparison V4 = ARP-STD L.W.P. K6 = ARP-NEW2 K4 = ARP-NEW2 + LPBLE EPCI L.W.P.

  15. GPCI ARP-STD ARP-NEW2 + LPBLE GPCI =GewexPacificCross-sectionIntercomparison Cloud Cover Less >0 biases with NEW2 V4 = ARP-STD Less <0 biases with NEW2 + LBLPE K6 = ARP-NEW2 K4 = ARP-NEW2 + LPBLE EPCI C. C.

  16. CROSS : 20S-40N average over : 10W-10E MAP-2D : the points located within: 10S-30N 35W-30E AMMA =AfricanMonsoonMultidisciplinaryAnalysis

  17. Cross-Section AMMA GCM runs Arpege / V4.5 : CNRM/EAC + ENM/UFR 2 years : 2000 (dry) and 2003 (moist) + one year (lost) of spin-up (1999 et 2002) NEW1 : TKE-GY + -phys-GY + CVGY + LPBLE / or not NEW2 : TKE-CBR + LOPEZ + CVGY + LPBLE / or not SST : Reynolds OI-v2 (daily interpolations) Altitude + Surf : a standard ARPEGE state (not ERA40) Aerosols : FMR(15) + Tegen < GMAP < CEPMMT Output : t=3h / NetCdF (similar to EPCI/GPCI)

  18. 3D Simulations + transect : impact of the Top PBL l’entrainment. “NEW2” Prognostic Physics : TKE-CBR + Lopez + CVs-GY (1) LPBLE = F LPBLE = T Better simulations of SC/Cu over the Golf of Guynea if LPBLE=.TRUE. … more low level clouds, at least… but ?

  19. 3D Simulations + transect : impact of the Top PBL l’entrainment. “NEW2” Prognostic Physics : TKE-CBR + Lopez + CVs-GY (2) “Omega” : 2000-06 Re-analysis NMC : More realistic indeed with LPBLE=TRUE LPBLE = T LPBLE = F

  20. Questions : • Problems with the diurnal cycle ? • Validation of Cloud Cover (Obs. / Ana.) ? => Radiation ! • Results for “T”, “q_v” and “q_l”… but for the wind ? for R.H. ? Results Conclusions • An (internal) validation of the ARPEGE physics… • An improvement with Top PBL entr. and with the new convection and the new micro-physics… • A real interest for the GPCI ; but jointly with SCM and GCM global analyses : the EUROCS’ method…

More Related