280 likes | 387 Views
A Numerical Study of a TOGA COARE Super Cloud Cluster – Preliminary results. Peter M.K. Yau and Badrinath Nagarajan McGill University. Outline. Motivation & Objectives Case Overview Modeling Strategy Results & Conclusions Future work. Motivation.
E N D
A Numerical Study of a TOGA COARE Super Cloud Cluster – Preliminary results Peter M.K. Yau and Badrinath Nagarajan McGill University
Outline • Motivation & Objectives • Case Overview • Modeling Strategy • Results & Conclusions • Future work
Motivation • MJO associated with supercloud clusters. Processes organizing warm-pool convection a “zeroth-order problem” (Webster & Lucas 1992) • Organizing mechanisms (OM) particularely at meso-and synoptic scale not well understood (Yanai et al 2000, Gabrowksi 2003). • Improved understanding of OM on various scales should lead to: • better representation of convection in models • reduced forecast errors at the medium range • better representation and understanding of the role of convection on water vapor distribution in the vertical
Objective Use a real data multi-grid (15-5-1 km) numerical modeling approach to • simulate supercloud clusters (SCCs) over TOGA COARE • diagnose the processes that: • organize MCSs, • cause clustering of MCSs, and • study the impact of convection on water vapor distribution in the vertical
OLR (W m-2) • Once a day • Averaged • 5S - 5N • OLR < 215 • W m-2 • Shaded • Focus of this study on SCC A Case Overview– IOP of TOGA COARE 1Nov 92 Yanai et al (2000) 1Dec 92 1Jan 93 1Feb 93 28 Feb 93
The 6 DEC. 92 – 6 JAN. 93 SUPER CLOUDCLUSTER • Time cluster: • Lifetime > 24 h • MCS: • Lifetime < 24 h IFA MCSs Time cluster Time Longitude • Data Used: • Hourly GMS • Infrared data • 0-10S average • Areas < 235 K • precipitating • (GATE/COARE • convection)
EVOLUTION of IFA time cluster (11-13 DEC 92) mm h-1 • Data Used: • Precipitation retrieved from • SSM/I, VIS/IR satellite data • Sheu et al (1996), Curry et al • (1999) • 3 hourly/ 30 km resolution
EVOLUTION of IFA time cluster (11-13 DEC 92) mm/h • Data Used: • Precipitation retrieved from • SSM/I, VIS/IR satellite data • Sheu et al (1996), Curry et al • (1999) • 3 hourly/ 30 km resolution
Schematics of Nakazawa (1988) Madden & Julian (1994)
Time cluster: • Lifetime > 24 h IFA 1 2 Westward propagating 3 4 Eastward propagating 5 6 7 Time 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Longitude Propagation of Time Clusters
IFA IFA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Time 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Longitude Westward propagating Eastwardpropagating PROPAGATION OF TIME CLUSTERS 200 hPa
Time Evolution of Domain Average Brightness Temperature Early morning minimum Afternoon minimum (land) Afternoon minimum (ocean)
Brightness temperature minimum occurs: • Early morning for 8 time clusters, • Afternoon for 4 time clusters • Suggests that most of the time clusters are indeed MCSs
Organizing Mechanisms • Large scale flow features (e.g., 2-day waves) • Vertical wind shear (Le Mone et al 1999) • Mid-level mesovortices (Nagarajan et al 2004) – Dec. 15, 1992 • Mapes gravity-wave mechanism
TIME CLUSTERS & 2-DAY PERIODICITY IFA 1 2 3 4 1-4, 7-9, 11-13 associated with 2-day wave (Chen et. al 1996, Takayabu et. al 1996) 5 6 7 Time 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Longitude K Westward propagating Eastwardpropagating
TIME CLUSTERS & VERTICAL SHEAR* (wind speed) *Areal & Temporal Averages Temporal average: Duration of the time cluster Areal average: 0-10S, longitudinal extent of time cluster
Summary During the lifetime of the SCC (6Dec-6Jan): • Identified 16 time clusters consisting of eastward & westward propagating cloud clusters. • Convection generally associated with 2-day wave activity • Convection occurred in a weak vertical wind shear environment except between 20-28 Dec 1992.
The Model • Canadian mc2 model (Benoit et al. 1997) • Fully compressible equations • Semi-Lagrangian, semi-implicit numerics • One-way nesting of lateral boundary conditions • RPN1 physics package 1 Recherche en Prevision du Numerique
1-month long time series Time series based on last 24 h of each 27h long simulation. 00 UTC/6 Dec. 92 03UTC/7 Dec. 92 00 UTC/7 Dec. 92 03 UTC/8 Dec. 92 00 UTC/6 Jan. 93 • 00 UTC chosen because of high availability of • rainfall data for assimilation • Time integration strategy follows guichard et al. • (2003)
130E 160E 190E 10N 3900 km EQ 10S 3900 km MC2 MODEL DOMAIN IFA Grid Size: 549 x 279 x 40, Horizontal grid length: 15 km Model Top: 26 km
Modeling Strategy • Model Parameters: • KF CPS (deep convection), BM CPS (shallow convection), Kong and Yau (1997) explicit bulk 2-ice microphysics, time step(90 s) • Initial Conditions: • ECMWF operational analysis (0.5 o) enhanced: • radiosonde data (Cieleski et al 2003), • temperature & moisture profiles modified by 1D-VAR rainfall rate assimilation scheme (Nagarajan et al. 2006) and • ABL moistening due to diurnal SST warming (Nagarajan et al 2001, 2004). • 6-hourly lateral boundary conditions
IFA averaged surface precipitation rate Missing data
Horizontal size distribution of clouds (Model Domain) Missing data Wielicki & Welch (1986)
Domain-averaged surface precipitation rate (140-180E, 0-10S) Missing data
IFA Av. RH RH Height (km) (h)
Conclusions • The IFA-mean and temporal variability of: • surface fluxes of latent and sensible heat, surface precipitation reasonable • Large scale : • Simulated surface precipitation overpredicted • Horizontal size of cloud clusters are reasonably simulated. • Month long mesoscale simulation captures reasonably the life cycle of the super cloud cluster.
Future Work • Nesting to higher resolutions (5 km and 1 km) with new three-moment 4 - ice microphysics (Milbrandt and Yau 2005a,b) • Diagnose mechanisms that organized the super cloud cluster • Diagnose processes for water vapor and temperature distributions