1 / 30

Quality of Service Management in Heterogeneous Networks

CTRQ 08. Quality of Service Management in Heterogeneous Networks. F. Racaru, M. Diaz and C. Chassot {racaru, diaz, chassot}@laas.fr LAAS-CNRS - Université de Toulouse - France IST EuQoS project. CTRQ July, 2008 - Bucharest. Outline. Context and problem statement

mick
Download Presentation

Quality of Service Management in Heterogeneous Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CTRQ 08 Quality of Service Management in Heterogeneous Networks F. Racaru, M. Diaz and C. Chassot {racaru, diaz, chassot}@laas.fr LAAS-CNRS - Université de Toulouse - France IST EuQoS project CTRQ July, 2008 - Bucharest

  2. Outline • Context and problem statement • QoS Management and Signalling • Evaluation Results • Conclusion and future work

  3. Multi domain QoS, and CAC Guaranteeing QoS for multimedia and real-time applications for Independent Heterogeneous Domains • Provisioning (with respect to SLA/SLS) • Invocation (when requests) • for one domain, Connection Admission Control is • Intra-domain CAC and • inter-domain link CAC : domain-to-domain link • For N domains, E2E Path and CAC • End2End Inter-domains Path with SIGNALLING CONTEXT QoS Management Evaluation Conclusion

  4. Some RelatedWork • IETF • IntServ and DiffServ • ITU-T, ETSI, 3GPP • NGN, IMS • Research Projects • QBone, AQUILA, TEQUILA, CADENUS, MESCAL • EUQOS (this work done in EuQoS) CONTEXT QoS Management Evaluation Conclusion

  5. Outline • Context and problem statement • QoS Management and Signalling • Evaluation Results • Conclusion and future work

  6. Definitions • Different domains (AS) are • Best-Effort domains or • QoS domains • QoS domains are • Controlled QoS domains or • Over-Provisioned QoS domains • Then QoS guarantee needs an end-to-end path of QoS domains Context QoS Management Evaluation Conclusion

  7. End-to-end path ????? ? ? ?????? AS Access network Access network ?????????? ? ? ?????????? ? ? DOMAIN AS DOMAIN DOMAIN Access network AS ? ? ? ?? ??????? AS AS AS Access network DOMAIN DOMAIN Access network

  8. SIGNALING Path Classical solution : use a Control Plane - Define a SIGNALING path (e.g. RSVP) - Use signaling path to force data path (on-path) - and Data sent on this QoS path =>> deployment ??? b) EuQoS choice - Select a DATA path BGP-based - Introduce Extended Bandwidth Brokers called Resource Managers (RM) - Derive SIGNALING from DATA path (off-path) - Send data on the (QoS) DATA path

  9. Start from Data Path : BGP-based(in EuQoS: q-BGP, with QoS classes) BR3-x BR3-out BR3-in BR4-in AS 3 BR3-y AS 4 BR4-out BR5-in Receiver AS 5 Sender BRout BR6-in Access Network AS 6

  10. Start from the BGP-based path BR4-in AS 4 BR4-out

  11. Add a BB/RM per domain BR4-in EBB4 AS 4 BR4-out

  12. BR4-in EBB4 BR4-out and use it during the Signaling Phase

  13. Use Signaling path during Signaling Phase BR4-in EBB4 AS 4 BR4-out And Use Data path during Data Phase

  14. And finally Integrate for all Domains EBB3 BR3-out EBB4 BR4-in AS 3 AS 4 BR4-out EBB5 BR5-in Receiver AS 5 Sender BR6-in BR5-out EBB6 Data Signaling AS 6

  15. SIGNALING wrt IETF NSIS EuQoS solution : EQ-NSIS (see EuQoS drafts) • Integrated with the IETF NSIS NSIS follows classical approach ==>> path-coupled, on-path • Then EuQoS extended NSIS with : • path-decoupled, off-path signaling • using NSIS and NON-NSIS domains

  16. EuQoS Global ARCHITECTURE Application Level USER 1 USER 2 Appli Appli Application QoS-based end-to-end signaling Virtual Network Level Technology Independent Sub-layer EBB/RMs RMi RM2 RM1 RMk RMj Ressource Allocators Com Prot RA1 RA2 Com Prot RAk RAi RAj QoS Network i QoS Network k Access Network 2 QoS Network j Access Network 1 Network technology Dependent sub-layer

  17. Invocation process (CAC) AQ-SSN NSIS EQ-SAP ResCom ResCom EBB/RM1 EBB/RM2 EBB/RM3 ResCom-Ack ResCom-Ack Res-Ack Res-Ack ResCom ResCom ResCom Res-Ack Com-Ack Com-Ack Com-Ack RA1 RA2 RA3 ResCom: Reserve and Commit Message Request ResCom-Ack : Reserve and Commit Message Ack Res-Ack : Reserve Message Ack ; Com-Ack : Commit Message Ack

  18. E2E networks/domains/ASs LOOSE PATH BGP-basedLOOSEPath :resources are checked in each domain by its EBB/RM Core Access Core Access AS1 AS2 AS3 AS4

  19. Outline • Context and problem statement • QoS Management and Signalling • Evaluation Results • Conclusion and future work

  20. Current implementation • UML 2.0 spec - simulation of signaling protocol • JAVA Implementation • Deployment • Emulation platform • EuQoS European platform • Functional and qualitative tests • (VoD, Games, Streaming, Platine, …) Context QoS Management EVALUATION Conclusion

  21. Test and trial Platform • Topology : 3 domains • Sender : load tool (generate QoS requests) • Measures : • Response Time on the sender • Processing Time on each EBB/RM EBB/RM1 EBB/RM3 EBB/RM2 Context QoS Management EVALUATION Conclusion

  22. Response time on the client (RTT) EBB/RM1 Context QoS Management EVALUATION Conclusion

  23. Scalability and Deployment • 1. For Scalability : Locally in each domain : • a. Use Parallel processors, Clusters of BBs, Simplify reservation, etc • b. Aggregate the domains : Integrating Loose and Hard models : EQ-PATHS • 2. For Technologies : • Ex : Integrate MPLS first by IETF PCE (Path Computation Elements) ==>> 1.b. and 2 managed the same way

  24. PCE PCE PCE MPLS & Path Computation Element 2: Path Computation 3: Path Response PCE PCC 1: Path Request TED • PCE architecture defines • PCC (Path Computation Client) : requests the MPLS path • and PCE : compute path = F (network graph & constraints) with PCC-PCE & PCE-PCE protocol & PCE discovery • Domain PCEs collaborate to compute an inter-domain HARD path Domain 3 Domain 2 Domain 1

  25. A PCE-MPLS Hard Path AS1 AS3 AS2

  26. BGP and PCE PCE Core Access Core Access AS1 AS2 AS3 AS4 The EQ-Path with BGP and PCE BGP

  27. Outline • Context and problem statement • QoS Management and Signalling • Evaluation results • Conclusion and future work

  28. Contributions and future work • An approach for the multi domain QoS • A scalable path-decoupled loose signaling for a QoS Internet model • Improve actual implementation and extend validation • Further investigate performance and scalability • Extend solution in order to integrate the evolution of the NSIS protocol suite • Take into account mobility Context QoS Management Evaluation CONCLUSION

  29. Acknowledgements • This proposal is being developed in the European research project EuQoS (http://www.euqos.org) • The project is composed by 24 partners • The key objective of EuQoS is to research, develop, integrate, test, validate, trial and demonstrate end-to-end QoS technologies to support advanced QoS aware applications - voice, video-conferencing, video streaming, tele-engineering and medical applications - over multiple, heterogeneous research, scientific industrial and national research network infrastructure testbeds. Context QoS Management Evaluation CONCLUSION

  30. EuQoS partners • 5 Network Providers • Prime Contractor: TID • 5 Corporations • 5 SMEs • Consultants • 9 Research Institutes Context QoS Management Evaluation CONCLUSION

More Related