510 likes | 838 Views
Challenges to Union. Ethnicity and National Identity in Europe. Key Terms. State Nation Ethnic Group State-Nation Ethnic-Nation. Ethnie. Nation. State. Ethnonationalism. Territorial ethnic movements seeking autonomy or independence peripheral to the union – OR – pro-Europe
E N D
Challenges to Union Ethnicity and National Identity in Europe
Key Terms • State • Nation • Ethnic Group • State-Nation • Ethnic-Nation Ethnie Nation State
Ethnonationalism • Territorial ethnic movements seeking autonomy or independence • peripheral to the union – OR – • pro-Europe • 'Europe of the regions' • No threat to EU
'Europe of the nations' • Different type of ethnicity and nationalism • Pose a challenge to the EU • Dominant Nationhood • Ethnic minorities/immigrant minorities • Dominant ethnicity
The EU: A cosmopolitan project • Long idea of establishing a realm of 'universal' law and governance in Europe • Began with the 'European Idea' of reunifying the continent under one church and one empire • Collapse of Roman Empire and the rise of the Reformation led to periodic attempts • Sully, Podiebrad – seek comity among nations and return to Latin-Christendom ideal
Enlightenment Europeanism • Penn, Diderot, Paine, St Simon and others • Were cosmopolitan liberals • Europeanism and cosmopolitanism linked • Favoured Europeanism as a ticket to peace, prosperity and Enlightenment • St Simon claims in 1821 that Europeanism as a sentiment already took precedence over nationalism • St Simon sees Anglo-French hub as motor of Europe • End to Papal and Roman dreams; harmony among peoples rather than rulers
The Evolution of the European Idea • Napoleon speaks of one European fatherland • After Napoleonic Wars, St Simon's ideas influential and popular. Influenced Lemonnier's Les Etats-Unis d'Europe (1872) • Revival of interest in St Simon after WWI • Most schemes were federal, though some post-WWI radicals rejected the nation outright • Paneuropa (1923) and other organisations lobby • Link between world unity and European unity, between peace organisations and paneuropean ones
Diplomatic Pressure of Paneuropean Groups • Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi writes Pan-Europa (1923) manifesto. Links to French politicians like Herriot, Loucheur, Leger, Briand • Edouard Herriot, 1925: 'My greatest wish is to see one day the United States of Europe become a reality' • First Pan-European Congress, 1926. Sponsored by Chancellor Seipel of Austria • Many Paneuropeans also strongly supported the League of Nations • Briand's Memorandum on a European Federal System (1930) circulated to European statesmen
EU structure • Degree of centralisation varies by function: • A Federation (i.e. 'State') in monetary affairs, agricultural, trade and environmental policy. Also in legal-social aspects and citizenship • A Confederation in social and economic policy, consumer protection, internal affairs • An International Organisation in foreign affairs
Council of Europe's Cultural Cosmopolitanism • Developed European flag with 12 golden stars (1955) • Established 5 May 1949 as Europe Day (1964) • Anthem based on Beethoven's Ode to Joy (1972) • Has 46 members today: distinct from EU, but complementary
Three Types - Three Challenges • Dominant Nationhood (civic nationalism) • Ethnic minorities or Immigrant Minorities • Dominant ethnicity (ethnic nationalism)
Dominant Nationhood • (civic nationalism) • Fears loss of sovereignty, • loss of economic policy • Loss of political-legal efficacy and national democracy • Foreign policy identity depends on the country
France: Gaullist pro-Europeanism • Seeks to reclaim French cultural predominance of 18th-19th c • Seeks to challenge Anglo-Saxon hegemony of 19th-20th c • Sees Anglo-Saxon west as ‘other’ • De Gaulle positions France at the heart of a Europe that includes Russia and is flanked by Anglo-Saxon West and Chinese East • 1963 crisis over UK entry into EEC which De Gaulle seeks to block UK entry
German pro-European Idealism • Nazi period discredits nationalism • Cosmopolitan as opposed to Gaullist spirit • Desire for influence and self-respect without nationalism • Less anti-Anglo-Saxon due to post-WWII (witness different attitudes toward English as language) • More truly cosmopolitan than French pro-Europeanism
Smaller Nations: Benelux • History of neutrality and fear of larger nations • History of pooling sovereignty in alliances • Only chance of agency is through a larger unit • Identity is less significant in absence of larger blocks • Belgium and Luxembourg lack clear linguistic or religious markers of nationhood unlike say Germany or France
Ethnic minorities/immigrant minorities - • Religious beliefs may challenge Enlightenment beliefs • EU identity diluted (i.e. 'from Tsar to Sultan') • Strengthens dominant ethnicity
Immigrant Integration • Different paths to integration • In UK, second generation is doing much better (esp. Hindu, Chinese) • UK: Intermarriage more among Afro-Caribs than Indo-Pakistani • UK & Holland: Caribbean Christians & 'Indos' better integrated than Muslim ethnic groups • Evidence of racial segregation in friendships
'Superdiversity'?: Inflow by region UK 2001 Source: Home Office
Religious Retention among Second Generation Immigrant Stock in the UK
Dominance: Ethnic, National, or State? • A group can be BOTH ethnic and national (ie. Welsh in Wales) • A group can be ethnic, national, and possess its own state (ie. Japanese) • Dominant Ethnic groups can dominant states or sub-state nations (ie. Ethnic Germans in Germany, Scots-Protestants in Scotland, Jews in Israel)
Dominant Ethnic Group • Ethnic Community which possesses political power in a given state • 2 types: • Elite Minority (Tutsi, ‘WASP’, Gulf Arab) • Majority Group (English in England, Japanese in Japan) • Most in Europe are dominant majorities • Omission in Current Literature
Dominant Ethnicity • (mainly ethnic nationalism) • Fear of internal migration • Possible cultural fears (language, religion) • Ethno-national congruence • Friction with OSCE codes, multiculturalism and EU human rights conventions • Expressed as rise of the far right & accommodation by centre-right parties
Dominant Ethno-Nationalism • Ethno-national congruence • Fear of immigration • Possible cultural fears (language, religion) • Friction with OSCE codes, multiculturalism and EU human rights conventions • Expressed as rise of the far right & accommodation by centre-right parties
The Far Right as a Worker's Party? • Anti-elitist, anti-political class • Claim that elite consensus 'represses' debate on immigration • In virtually no European country does main left-wing party retain majority support among white male workers
Dominant Ethno-Nationalism: Theories • Instrumentalist - dominant ethno-nationalism is driven by immigrant competition with natives for jobs • Ethno-symbolist - perceived violation of ‘sacred,’ historicised ethnie-nation link is the key • ‘Constructivist’ (Psychological) - Rapid change brings disorientation and a quest for order among those affected by change
Multiculturalism • Kymlicka's Liberalism, Community and Culture (1989), followed by a number of works in 1990s • Taylor's Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition (1994) • Inspired partly by 'multicultural' movement of minorities for 'recognition' vis a vis majority culture in Canada • Canadian multiculturalism policy dates from 1971, similar demands in US since late 60s
Cosmopolitan-multiculturalist vision • Dominant ethnic groups lose identity and members become cosmopolitan individualists • Ethnic minorities retain their identity and provide consumer choice and 'colour' • Bourne, c. 1916: WASPs 'breathe a larger air', Jews 'stick to their faith' • Contradiction: cosmopolitanism among hosts, ethnicity among immigrants
The New Cultural Cosmopolitanism • European idea was mainly one of political unity rather than cultural unity • American idea had a much earlier emphasis on melting (i.e. Crevecoeur's 'strange mixture of races', c. 1782) • But Europe has now adopted the cultural cosmopolitanism once found only in America
The EU and Cultural Cosmopolitanism • EU approach: Multiculturalism, Human Rights, Border Control - in tension. • Reflects tensions between cosmopolitan and realpolitik/intergovernmental spheres • Multiculturalism and human rights reflects cosmopolitan side
Cosmopolitanism for Majorities • All become consumers and world citizens • Weak identities, apart from European project, lifestyle and egalitarian-liberalism • Identity forged vs USA. Defined by liberal egalitarianism, i.e. 'European Dream' (Rifkin) • Hope given by rise in university education, generational replacement • Effect shown in social surveys
The Reaction to Multiculturalism • Dominant ethnic nationalists resist all forms of multiculturalism • Surveys show that anti-immigration and anti-EU attitudes are linked • Even those who are willing to accept immigrants are afraid of threat to secular culture, language and civic-national identity • A majority of most electorates
90s Intellectual Opposition • Individualist Liberals (i.e. Brian Barry, Michael Ignatieff) • Civic Nationalists (David Miller, David Goodhart, New Labour, Francis Fukuyama, etc) • 'Civic Nationalist' Critiques: • Hinders welfare state • Reduces civic trust and political participation • Decline in common values and national identity • Increased ethnic conflict • Ethnic Nationalists: threat to survival of dominant ethnic groups, 'reverse discrimination'
Multiculturalism in Retreat • Multiculturalism in retreat in the US and Australia in the 1990s • Changes in France, Holland, and elsewhere in Europe (partly linked to challenge from far right) since 1990s • Change in Britain (criticism of Parekh report; Trevor Phillips of CRE) in 2000-2004 (linked to 9/11)
The Return of Assimilation • An attempt to navigate between ethnic nationalism and multiculturalism • Ethnic conflict prompts increased call for national unity in the face of diversity (i.e. Germany, Holland, UK, France) • Hopes are for integration into nations, reducing inter-ethnic conflict • Shift from multiculturalism to integration. Even a return of assimilation/republicanism and civic nationalism
Civic or Liberal Nationalism • From Kohn (1944) to Miller (1995) and Tamir (1993) • Civic nationalism will reinforce resistance to EU as nations become more 'American' • Will not assuage anxieties of dominant group • Minorities must organically come to feel attachment to the nation, cannot be cajoled out of old identities • Civic identities must be universal and thin, difficult to compete with ethnic traditions
Dominant groups will not go away, Minorities may not assimilate • Dominant groups may reject newcomers entirely • Assimilation a long-term process. European and US examples • May not be fast enough to absorb immigrants or respond to demographic crisis • Real key is at the level of the dominant ethnic group, and its ability to assimilate • Ethnic groups should not be rigid, but retain their cores and engage in assimilation
Liberal Ethnicity (Kaufmann 2000) • Recognition of both minority and dominant ethnic groups • Devolves task of assimilation to ethnic groups • Longer-term view • Ethnic cores remain relatively fixed, but boundaries can absorb newcomers • No coercive state-nationalism from above
A Europe of Liberal Nations • Need to consider better guarantees of ontological security: including limits on migration between member states • EU as Europe of nations, pooling many functions • Recognition of both dominant and minority ethnic groups • May in time lead to closer political integration