1 / 17

Motivate and Retain: Implementing an Effective Developmental Writing Curriculum

Motivate and Retain: Implementing an Effective Developmental Writing Curriculum. Janet Horninger, M.Ed. Kara VanDam, M.A. A Need for Developmental Courses. 75% of community college students never graduate 1

mihaly
Download Presentation

Motivate and Retain: Implementing an Effective Developmental Writing Curriculum

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Motivate and Retain:Implementing an Effective Developmental Writing Curriculum Janet Horninger, M.Ed. Kara VanDam, M.A.

  2. A Need for Developmental Courses • 75% of community college students never graduate1 • 53% of new college students lack basic reading, writing, or math skills and require remediation2 • This is up from 29% of students just ten years ago3

  3. Traditional Developmental Courses • Are often low-credit or no-credit courses • Set students behind in their degree plan • Isolate students by removing them from their cohorts • Stigmatize students by placing them in a “special” class • Label students as “developmental” or “remedial” which to students = “dumb”

  4. An approach to solve these issues • Our course is full-credit • Our course meets same outcomes as traditional Composition I course: standards are not lowered • Students stay in degree sequence with their cohorts • Our course and its students are not identified as “developmental”, “remedial” or other

  5. Best of all… • Students know they are in a “real” class! • In the words of one student, “I’m just so excited to be in a writing class that starts with a 100”

  6. How is all this accomplished? On the instructor’s side: • Instructors have strong experience in developmental pedagogy • Instructors meet to share best practices • Instructors perform a great deal of student outreach • Instructors interact with students at a high level • Instructors take the time to know their students

  7. Why? Online Education Requires Different Teaching Methods • A higher level of interaction: Students consider maintaining a high-level of interaction to be the “most important role of the instructor in on-line classes” (Kearsley, 2000) • An understanding of the sacrifices our students are making to attend college

  8. How is all this accomplished? On the student’s side: • Sections are limited to 16 students • Students are provided with a wide range of supplemental services which includes tutoring and reference material in our large Writing Center

  9. How is all this accomplished? In the curriculum: • Sentence-level issues receive a great deal of attention • Students work step-by-step through the entire writing process with every assignment • Students see many sample assignments

  10. Did it help? Yes! In first two terms: • Average failure rate decreased 20% • Failure rate in “regular” Composition I course exceeded the failure rate in the “developmental” course • The average grade point was .22 higher for these “developmental” students than their “regular” cohorts

  11. Students liked the course and the instructors better • First two terms’ teaching and course measures were significantly higher for the developmental version

  12. Did this Translate to Future Success? • 74% of passing students continued to the next term • The average next-term GPA of those students was a 2.7, a B- • 30% of students of these carried an A average in the next term • Only 4% carried an F average the next term • For those taking Comp II in the next term, the average course grade was a B

  13. Are We Helping All Who Need Help? • Recall from the introduction that nationally 53% of students require some remediation • Yet, less than 10% of our students were placing into this course • Option 1: Make cut-off on placement exam higher so more students are placed in • Option 2: Understand that perhaps the “norm” needs to change for what’s “regular”

  14. What Have We Done to Address This? • While we are currently changing the placement test, more significantly • We have incorporated much of what worked well in the “developmental” into the “regular” curriculum • Students have to show more of their work during the writing process • Students have more access to sample assignments

  15. What Has Been the Impact? • More data is needed, but signs are hopeful there has been some improvement

  16. What have we learned? • Many students needing additional support can be reached and retained. • Faculty can work closely with students and their fellow instructors to build a strong, supportive community in which all involved thrive.

  17. References • Boylan, H., Bonham, B., & Bliss, L. (1992). National study of developmental education: Students, programs and institutions of higher education--Summary report. Boone, NC: National Center for Developmental Education. • Tritelli, D. (2003, Winter). From the editor. Peer Review (Association of American Colleges and Universities). Retrieved August 23, 2005 from http://www.aacu-edu.org/peerreview/pr-wi03/pr-wi03editor.pdf • Gose, B. (1997). Tutoring companies take over remedial teaching at some colleges. The Chronicle. Retrieved August 23, 2005 from http://chronicle.com/colloquy/97/remedial/background.htm • Kearsley, G. (2000). Online education: Learning and teaching in cyberspace. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

More Related