150 likes | 271 Views
What is the charmed analog of L (1405)?. Kiyoshi Tanida (Seoul National University) Aug. 23, 2011 APFB2011, Seoul. Λ ( 1405 ). How is it in charmed sector?. Large mass difference of πΣ and DN → mixing should be small Both of Σπ resonance and ND bound state can be seen as separate peaks?.
E N D
What is the charmed analog of L(1405)? Kiyoshi Tanida (Seoul National University) Aug. 23, 2011 APFB2011, Seoul
How is it in charmed sector? • Large mass difference of πΣ and DN→ mixing should be small • Both of Σπ resonance and ND bound state can be seen as separate peaks?
Σcπresonance? • Just on Σcπ threshold • Still, the main decay mode is Σcπ
Is there DN bound state? • JP are unknown, but they may be the bound state.Binding energies: 45MeV& 10MeV, respectively • In the strangeness sector, attraction for I=0 channel is stronger than I=1.
Λc(2765) Λc(2880) PRL86(2001)4479 data from CLEO B decay →Λc*→Λcππ(Σcπ、Σc*π included) Width~50MeV Λc(2765)
CLEO data Λc(2880) Λc(2765) Λc(2880) Σcπ BR=31±7% Rough estimation in similar way: Λc(2765) Σcπ ~26% Λc(2765) Σc*π ~33% via Σcπ via Σc*π
BELLE data PRL98 (2007) 262001 This paper’s main subject is Λc(2880), but Λ(2765) was clearly seen, too. Black: via Σcπ Red:sideband background (scaled) Width:73±5 MeV (Not used in PDG)
Σcπ partial decay rate? • Λc(2595): • Full width=3.6+2.0-1.3 MeV • BR(Σcπ) > 70%. Partial width ~ 2.5 MeV • Λc(2765): • Rough estimation: Γ(Σcπ)~ 30MeV • Dividing by phase space・・・ • Λc(2595): Q-value too smallΣc++π-: 1.7±0.6MeV、 Σc+π0: 7.4±0.7 MeVQ may be < 0 (Threshold effect on spectrum)→Unmeasured Σc+π0 mode would be the main channel • Squared matrix element may be twice larger forΛc(2595)
Λc(2595) shape • CLEO data fit with threshold effect considered. (PRD67 074033) M(Λc*)- M(Λc) = 305.6±0.3 MeV ~3 MeV below Scp
Known things • Λ(1405)analog states • Σπ resonance certainly exists. • DN bound state: candidate exists. • Comparing partial decay rates, it seems Λc(2595) has a stronger coupling to Σcπ • Λc(2765) has too many unknowns, and the quality of data Λc(2595) is not enough.
What we want to know • Is Λc(2765) really the ND bound state and can be considered as a Λ(1405) analog state? • Key measurements • Spin-parity: Many controversial predictions • Decay width, branching ratios • Λc(2595) needs more data, too. • Need to consider threshold effect. Σc+π0 mode would be a key. • Need help from theory side • Threshold effect for Λc(2595) • Discussion from partial widths • Determination of parity (which was the case for Λc(2880))
BELLEdata PRL98 (2007) 262001 This paper’s main subject is Λc(2880), but Λ(2765) was clearly seen, too. Black: via Σcπ Red:sideband background (scaled) Width:73±5 MeV (Not used in PDG)
Possibility at BELLE • Decay widths seem feasible • Is Λc(2595)→Σc+π0 possible? • Determination of spin • angular distribution ofΛc→Σcπ • Done for Λc(2880) • Parity • Most difficult • Λc(2880) parity was determined from BR ofΣcπand Σc*π using model (heavy quarksymmetry)
Summary • Charmed analog of Λ(1405) • Σπresonance: Λc(2595) • DNbound state: Λc(2765)? • We want to know the nature of Λc(2765) • Spin-parity (1/2- ?) • Decay width measurements would help, too. • B-factory data contains huge statistics→ analysis seems feasible