170 likes | 514 Views
Presentation Overview. Background Ethanol in Western CanadaRole of starch properties in a-amylolysisResearch ObjectivesProposed MethodologyFindings to dateRecommendations. Background: Ethanol as an Alternative Energy. Ethanol industry in Western Canada is rapidly developingGrowing need for a sustainable supply of wheat tailored to the demands of the industryIndustry prefers not to scavenge wheat destined for human consumption (low starch, high protein)Ethanol quality varietals (high sta32434
E N D
1. Effects of wheat starch content and structure on the availability of fermentable sugars to optimize ethanol production Jessica Saunders, MSc Candidate and David B. Levin, PhD
Department of Biosystems Engineering
University of Manitoba
2. Presentation Overview Background
Ethanol in Western Canada
Role of starch properties in a-amylolysis
Research Objectives
Proposed Methodology
Findings to date
Recommendations
3. Background: Ethanol as an Alternative Energy Ethanol industry in Western Canada is rapidly developing
Growing need for a sustainable supply of wheat tailored to the demands of the industry
Industry prefers not to scavenge wheat destined for human consumption (low starch, high protein)
Ethanol quality varietals (high starch, low protein)
Wheat/Corn (Canada) – 1.7 Billion Liters, 3.1 Billion Liters by 2010
4. Background: Ethanol as an Alternative Energy
6. Starch is a food storage polysaccharide used by plants to organize glucose polymers
Two unique patterns of linear organization:
AMYLOPECTIN (75%) AMYLOSE (25%)
7. Background: Amylose vs. Amylopectin Starch linear structural pattern confers unique tertiary structure
AMYLOPECTIN (75%) AMYLOSE (25%)
8. Background: Amylose vs. Amylopectin Literature suggests that amylopectin is more readily digested by a-amylase
Genetically modified maize, rice and barley containing 100% amylopectin starch are digested faster than normal counterparts (Noda et al. 2002)
Resistant starches (low GI starches) exhibit slow release of glucose into intestinal lumen, non-resistant starches (high GI starches) exhibit rapid release of glucose into lumen (Bird et al. 2007)
Resistant starches – high amylose content
Non-resistant starches – high amylopectin content
9. Wheat endosperms consist of three distinct starch granules (Raeker et al., 1998)
A-granules: large, disc shaped
B-granules: small, spherical shape
C-granules: not well defined
10. Riffkin et al. (1990) and Brosnan et al. (1999)
Contributary role of starch granule size distribution to ethanol yield
11. Research Goals What structural features of wheat starch make high ethanol producing varietals?
Characterize various classes of wheat (spring, winter and waxy) to establish their potential as feedstock for bioethanol production.
Characterizing starch content and structure within classes and varietals of wheat to establish inherent variation in chemical constitution.
Correlate starch content and structure with production of fermentable sugars during liquefaction.
Resultant ethanol yield from profile of fermentable sugars.
12. Proposed Methodology: Wheat Characterization Six classes of spring and winter wheats, as well as triticale, are under investigation
Chemical Constitution: Percentage Protein, Starch, Ash, and Arabinoxylan
Starch Granule Organization: Amylose/Amylopectin ratios, Degree of Amylopectin Branching, Starch Granule Polymorph Distribution
13. Proposed Methodology: Oligosaccharide Profiling After Liquefaction Protocols being established in conjuncture with collaborators at the Canadian Grain Research Laboratory
Whole grain milled to 0.5 mm
Whole grain cooked to mash
Liquefaction carried out at 83.5 C using a-amylase for batch runs that exhaust starch substrate
Liquefied mash samples withdrawn, centrifuged and supernatant analyzed for fermentable sugars (glucose, maltose, maltotriose, maltotetrose ) using HPAEC with pulsed-amperometic detection
15. Results: Chemical Constituents of Whole Grain
16. Results: Starch Structural Properties
17. Recommendations: Chemical characteristics of wheat starch ideal for use as bioethanol feedstock
18. Acknowledgments
This work was supported by funds provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and Husky Energy.
Special thanks are extended to Dr. David Levin, Dr. Richard Sparling, Dr. Nazim Cicek, and Dr. Marta Izyadorcyk for their guidance and support.