380 likes | 558 Views
Preparing Our Students for the 21 st Century. August 10, 2011 Sasheen Phillips, Interim Associate Superintendent Center for Curriculum and Assessment Ohio Department of Education. Influential Components of a 21st Century Education. College and Career Ready Academic Standards
E N D
Preparing Our Students for the 21st Century August 10, 2011 Sasheen Phillips, Interim Associate Superintendent Center for Curriculum and Assessment Ohio Department of Education
Influential Components of a21st Century Education • College and Career Ready Academic Standards • High Quality Instructional Strategies • Rapid Data Reporting and Feedback • Modernized Assessments
What is College and Career Readiness? Being qualified for: • A degree-granting postsecondary education, without remediation • Achosen career, ready for advanced training.
Are Ohio Students Ready for College? ACT, “The Conditions of College & Career Readiness, Class of 2010: Ohio.”
Ohio College Students Needing Remediation Source: Ohio Board of Regents
Jobs Require More Education & Training Today and Tomorrow Source: Carnevale, Anthony P., Nicole Smith, and Jeff Strohl, “Help Wanted: Projections of Jobs and Education Requirements Through 2018”, Georgetown Center on Education and the Workforce, 2010. almost 2/3
Ohio’s New Academic Standards Common Core Ohio’s revised standards • English language arts • Mathematics • Science • Social Studies
Common Core and State Revised Standards Reflect New Features: New Focus: • Fewer, clearer, and higher • Internationally benchmarked • An aligned model curriculum • College and career readiness • Content and skills • Coherence, focus, rigor
Attributes of the CCSS: English Language Arts • Shift in emphasis from fiction to nonfictionin reading and writing. • Focus on close analysis of texts with evidence to back up claims and conclusions. • Emphasis in teaching literacy skills in and through history/social studies, science, and technical content areas. Based on Reading framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Attributes of the CCSS: Mathematics • Greater emphasis on reasoning and problem solving • Teach content through the standards for mathematical practices
Attributes of the Science Standards • Support learning at all cognitive levels • Promotescience application with content • Embedscientific inquiry, engineering and technological design
Attributes of the Social Studies Standards • Support a comprehensive curriculumthat includes history, geography, government and economics • Attend to historical and spatial thinking and civic participation • Include economic decision- making and financial literacy
How Does Response to Intervention (RtI) Contribute to 21st Century Education? Provides a comprehensive framework to meet the instructional needs of ALL students
What Is RtI? A school-wide system for allocating instructional resources where they are needed: • Gives all students access to the regularcurriculum AND provide differentiatedinstruction and support • Labels are less important than providing additional instruction where it is needed • Integrates regular and special education (Students with disabilities are in every tier--next slide)
RtI Framework Tier 3: (~3%) Intensive individualized interventions Tier 2: Targeted interventions (~15%) Rapid-response interventions for at-risk students Time, intensity, and data increasePercentage of students decreases Tier 1: High-quality curriculum and instruction for all students (100%) Differentiation, based on insights into student thinking
Curricular Supports & Instructional Strategies Model Curricula Formative Instruction & Assessments Instructional Improvement System
Goals of Model Curricula To help teachers: • Reach a shared understanding of the intent of the Common Core and revised standards • Provide differentiated instruction fordiverse learners • Find resources that match higher expectations and support technological applications
Model Curricula Components • Content Elaboration • Detailed information on the content and skills addressed at a grade level, grade band and course • Expectations for Learning • Recommendations for how students may be evaluated • Applies only to science and social studies
Model Curricula Components • Instructional Strategies and Resources • Guidance and support for instructional, curricular and assessment design • Links to resources for diverse learners • Content Specific Sections • Address elements specific to a subject area, such as • Misconceptions (science and mathematics) • Enduring Understandings (English language arts and social studies)
Model Curriculum Template Content Elaborations Instructional Strategies and Resources Expectations for Learning Content Specific Sections
Science Standards and Model Curriculum Grade 7 -Earth and Space Science Content Elaborations Expectations for Learning
Instructional Strategies suggested by Ohio’s teachers Strategies for Diverse Learners Instructional Resources Include print and electronic Content Specific Sections-Unique to the Subject
ELA and Science Model Curricula Model Curricula English Language Arts Science
Model Curricula Summary 774Model Curricula have been developed across all four content areas. There is a model curriculum in grades K-12 for each: • Cluster in mathematics • Topic in English language arts • Content statement in science and social studies
Formative Instruction A continuous instructional process that elicits evidence of student understanding. Provides feedback so: • Teachers can make informed adjustments to instruction • Students can take ownership of their learning
Formative Instruction Modules and Professional Development Web-based formative instruction modules • Foundations of formative instruction • Content-specific modules • Module for instructional leaders • Module for instructional supervisors Regional Professional Development • Training and support on modules • Support to districts
Formative Assessment Pilot Will be implemented at the middle school level in Math and ELA: • Portfolio of processes and strategies tied to CCSS will support teachers in practice • Portfolio will be incorporated into the instruction improvement system (IIS) • Will include professional development and/or training on formative assessment strategy development connected to professional development modules
Instructional Improvement System Structure and Components: • Online access to electronic curriculum, resources and tools aligned to the new academic standards • Curriculum customization for differentiated instruction • Online portfolio of formative assessments • Data-analysiscapabilities including early-warning indicators for teachers, administrators, parents, and students.
IIS Operational Model Standards/Curriculum Curriculum Evaluation Curriculum Design & Development Curriculum Maintenance Advanced Analysis (current & historical) Instructional Practices Data Analysis & Rapid-Time Reporting Instructional Design Educator Profiles & Professional Development Achievement Reporting Tools for Learning Achievement Analysis Class Data Management Test Scoring & Processing Assessment Tools Test Creation & Storage Assessments & Growth
Ohio’s New Assessments: HB153 • K-8 • Combine reading and writing into a single English language arts assessment • Establish 3 performance levels (instead of 5) • High School • College Test • Series of End of Course exams
Ohio’s New Assessments Assessment consortia State-developed • English language arts • Mathematics • Science • Social Studies
Assessment Consortia Both PARCC & SMARTER Balanced consortia will have : • English language arts and mathematics assessments • On-line testing • Interim and summative components • Item Types • Multiple choice • Extended response • Technology-enhanced • Performance assessments • High school tests: End-of-course vs. End-of-year • Teachers involved in developing and scoring tests
Assessment Consortia • SMARTER Balanced (SBAC): • Consortia of 29 States • Attributes: • Computer-Adaptive Summative Assessment • Performance Tasks • Optional Formative Interim Assessments • Rapid reporting system to inform instruction and accountability • Partnership for Assessment of Readiness (PARCC): • Consortia of 23 states + D.C. • Attributes: • Computer-Based Summative Assessment • Performance-based Assessments • Optional Early and Mid-Year Formative Assessments • Rapid reporting system to inform instruction and accountability
Assessment Efforts • House Bill 1 Assessment Committee • SBAC Formative Assessment Work Group • SBAC Performance Assessment Work Group • CCSSO Implementing Common Core Standards • PARCC Transition and Implementation Institute
Assessment Timeline State Board Adopted Standards June, 2010 • Development Phase: • Test development • Field testing • Standards setting • 2012 - 2014 State Board Adopted Model Curriculum March, 2011 First Assessment Administration 2014-2015 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015