1 / 18

Evaluation Realities: What the Theories and Standards Do Not Say

Les Bolt, Ph.D. Appalachian State University 2009 National Evaluation Institute Louisville, KY October 10, 2009. Evaluation Realities: What the Theories and Standards Do Not Say. Researcher Context. Ph.D. in Research and Evaluation from UVA 30+ Years Experience Doing Formal Evaluation

milos
Download Presentation

Evaluation Realities: What the Theories and Standards Do Not Say

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Les Bolt, Ph.D. Appalachian State University 2009 National Evaluation Institute Louisville, KY October 10, 2009 Evaluation Realities:What the Theories and Standards Do Not Say

  2. Researcher Context • Ph.D. in Research and Evaluation from UVA • 30+ Years Experience Doing Formal Evaluation • 75+ External Third-Party Evaluations • 1-4 Year Terms • Local/Regional/State/National Scope • $5,000 - $15,000,000 Budget Range • Public/Foundation/Non-Profit/Private Monies • Department/College/University Level Experience in Personnel and Program Evaluation, and Student Assessment

  3. Research Methodology • Narrative Review • Evaluation Narratives • Evaluator’s Notes • Client Feedback • Auto-Ethnographic Reflection • Evaluator Interviews

  4. Major Hurdles That Emerged • Insufficient Clarity of Outcomes • Lack of Baseline Data and Data Sources • Conflicting Stakeholder Expectations • Inertia from Previous Program/Practices • Fluid Leadership

  5. Insufficient Clarity of Outcomes • Process Focus Instead of Outcome Focus • Fuzzy Outcomes • Processes and Outcomes Not Logically Related

  6. Lack of Baseline Data and Data Sources • No Reliable Pre-Measures • Pre-Measures not Related to Outcomes • No Data Available to Construct Baseline

  7. Conflicting Stakeholder Expectations • Not All Stakeholders Involved in Project/Program Conception • Stakeholder Drop-In / Drop-Out • Expectations not Expressed at Beginning of Project

  8. Inertia from Previous Programs/Practices • Laundry List Effect • Processes and Materials Not Clearly Defined • “Resentful Demoralization” Surfaces

  9. Fluid Leadership • Concept People Effect (Getting $$ vs. Operating Project) • Shifting Leadership • Loss of Leadership Interest

  10. Managing the Hurdles • Recognize • Assess Impact • Accommodate • Acknowledge Limitations

  11. Strategies for Accommodating Hurdles • Conduct Environmental Scan before Beginning • Triangulation of Expectations • Baselines Based on Best Practices Research • Establishing Firewalls between Previous and Current Practice • Identification of Specific Changes in Governance, Staffing and Funding

  12. Conduct Environmental Scan before Beginning • Stated Processes vs. Actual Practice • Stated Processes vs. Resource Allocation • Stated Outcomes vs. Data Collected • Rationale for Discrepancies

  13. Triangulation of Expectations • Identification of “Real” Stakeholders • Communication of Expectations • Consensus on Expectations • Consensus on Data Needed

  14. Baselines Based on Best Practices • Understand the Project/Program Limitations • Review Literature that Applies • Plan and Budget for Best Practices Research • Do Your Homework

  15. Establishing Firewalls between Previous and Current Practice • Set Clear Project Dates • Be Clear with Definitions • Use Qualifying Prompts in Surveys, Questionnaires, etc. • Identify Sources of Bias

  16. Specific Changes in Governance, Staffing and Funding • Look for Explicit Policy Changes • Look for Budget Changes and Transitions to Hard Monies • Look for Personnel Shifts and Changes in Job Descriptions • Look for Hard Resource Allocations

  17. Summary • Understand Context • Understand the Program or Project • Be Flexible but Rigorous • Ask a Lot of Questions • Report What You See

  18. Questions and Discussion Contact: boltll@appstate.edu or boltll@comcast.net

More Related