400 likes | 521 Views
Disintegrated Planning: Exploring and Crossing the Natural and Built Environment Divide. Alister Scott BA PhD MRTPI .
E N D
Disintegrated Planning: Exploring and Crossing the Natural and Built Environment Divide. Alister Scott BA PhD MRTPI Claudia Carter, Richard Coles, David Collier, Chris Crean, Rachel Curzon, Bob Forster, Nick Grayson, Andrew Hearle, David Jarvis, Miriam Kennet, Peter Larkham, Karen Leach, Mark Middleton, Nick Morton, Mark Reed, Hayley Pankhurst, Nicki Schiessel, Ben Stonyer, Ruth Waters and Keith Budden relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme
1. The lenses of spatial planning and the ecosystem approach
1. The lenses of spatial planning and the ecosystem approach 2. The disintegrated development of the built and natural environment
1. The lenses of spatial planning and the ecosystem approach 3. Crossing the divide: framework, tools and applications 2. The disintegrated development of the built and natural environment
1. The lenses of spatial planning and the ecosystem approach 3. Crossing the divide: framework, tools and applications 2. The disintegrated development of the built and natural environment 4. Lessons for policy and practice
The purpose.....To boldly go… • Beyond boundaries • Beyond biodiversity • Beyond planning • Beyond the status quo • Beyond OUR comfort zones
Carter 2012 “The divide of ‘built’ and ‘natural’ environment, is particularly evident within the specialist focus on the ‘urban’ or the ‘rural’. It is deeply engrained in academic disciplines and professional training paths. Interdisciplinarity is much talked about but yet few truly practice it or use it to structure research, degree courses or professional qualifications. So, not surprisingly, we end up with rural specialists and urban specialists. But this artificial separation is unhelpful and affects our understanding, research, policy and practice. In reality, there are so many interdependencies and linkages that ignoring one to focus on the other only makes partial sense and only provides partial answers.” Building interdisciplinarity across the rural domain
Connecting People-Place-Environment • Dan’s cartoon please EA
Natural Environment lens Built Environment lens Disintegrated Development Natural Environment White Paper Habitat and Landscape DEFRA Ecosystem Approach Classifying and Valuing National Ecosystem Assessment Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas Nature Improvement Areas Local Nature Partnerships National Planning Policy Framework Local DCLG Spatial Planning Zoning and Ordering Sustainability Assessments Development/Neighbourhood Plans Enterprise Zones / Green Belts Local Enterprise Partnerships
Natural Environment lens Built Environment lens Disintegrated Development Incentives Natural Environment White Paper Habitat and Landscape DEFRA Ecosystem Approach Classifying and Valuing National Ecosystem Assessment Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas Nature Improvement Areas Local Nature Partnerships Control National Planning Policy Framework Local DCLG Spatial Planning Zoning and Ordering Sustainability Assessments Development/Neighbourhood Plans Enterprise Zones / Green Belts Local Enterprise Partnerships
Natural Environment lens Built Environment lens Control National Planning Policy Framework Local DCLG Spatial Planning Zoning and Ordering Sustainability Assessments Development/Neighbourhood Plans Enterprise Zones / Green Belts Local Enterprise Partnerships • Incentives • Natural Environment White Paper • Habitat and Landscape • DEFRA • Ecosystem Approach • Classifying and Valuing • National Ecosystem Assessment • Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas • Nature Improvement Areas • Local Nature Partnerships
Natural Environment lens Built Environment lens Control National Planning Policy Framework Local DCLG Spatial Planning Zoning and Ordering Sustainability Assessments Development/Neighbourhood Plans Enterprise Zones / Green Belts Local Enterprise Partnerships • Incentives • Natural Environment White Paper • Habitat and Landscape • DEFRA • Ecosystem Approach • Classifying and Valuing • National Ecosystem Assessment • Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas • Nature Improvement Areas • Local Nature Partnerships
Natural Environment lens Built Environment lens Control National Planning Policy Framework Local DCLG Spatial Planning Zoning and Ordering Sustainability Assessments Development/Neighbourhood Plans Enterprise Zones / Green Belts Local Enterprise Partnerships • Incentives • Natural Environment White Paper • Habitat and Landscape • DEFRA • Ecosystem Approach • Classifying and Valuing • National Ecosystem Assessment • Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas • Nature Improvement Areas • Local Nature Partnerships
Natural Environment lens Built Environment lens Control National Planning Policy Framework Local DCLG Spatial Planning Zoning and Ordering Sustainability Assessments Development/Neighbourhood Plans Enterprise Zones / Green Belts Local Enterprise Partnerships • Incentives • Natural Environment White Paper • Habitat and Landscape • DEFRA • Ecosystem Approach • Classifying and Valuing • National Ecosystem Assessment • Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas • Nature Improvement Areas • Local Nature Partnerships
Natural Environment lens Built Environment lens Control National Planning Policy Framework Local DCLG Spatial Planning Zoning and Ordering Sustainability Assessments Development/Neighbourhood Plans Enterprise Zones / Green Belts Local Enterprise Partnerships • Incentives • Natural Environment White Paper • Habitat and Landscape • DEFRA • Ecosystem Approach • Classifying and Valuing • National Ecosystem Assessment • Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas • Nature Improvement Areas • Local Nature Partnerships
Natural Environment lens Built Environment lens Control National Planning Policy Framework Local DCLG Spatial Planning Zoning and Ordering Sustainability Assessments Development/Neighbourhood Plans Enterprise Zones / Green Belts Local Enterprise Partnerships • Incentives • Natural Environment White Paper • Habitat and Landscape • DEFRA • Ecosystem Approach • Classifying and Valuing • National Ecosystem Assessment • Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas • Nature Improvement Areas • Local Nature Partnerships
Natural Environment lens Built Environment lens Control National Planning Policy Framework Local DCLG Spatial Planning Zoning and Ordering Sustainability Assessments Development/Neighbourhood Plans Enterprise Zones / Green Belts Local Enterprise Partnerships • Incentives • Natural Environment White Paper • Habitat and Landscape • DEFRA • Ecosystem Approach • Classifying and Valuing • National Ecosystem Assessment • Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas • Nature Improvement Areas • Local Nature Partnerships
Natural Environment lens Built Environment lens Control National Planning Policy Framework Local DCLG Spatial Planning Zoning and Ordering Sustainability Assessments Development/Neighbourhood Plans Enterprise Zones / Green Belts Local Enterprise Partnerships • Incentives • Natural Environment White Paper • Habitat and Landscape • DEFRA • Ecosystem Approach • Classifying and Valuing • National Ecosystem Assessment • Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas • Nature Improvement Areas • Local Nature Partnerships
Natural Environment lens Built Environment lens Control National Planning Policy Framework Local DCLG Spatial Planning Zoning and Ordering Sustainability Assessments (SEA) Development/Neighbourhood Plans Enterprise Zones / Green Belts Local Enterprise Partnerships • Incentives • Natural Environment White Paper • Habitat and Landscape • DEFRA • Ecosystem Approach • Classifying and Valuing • National Ecosystem Assessment • Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas • Nature Improvement Areas • Local Nature Partnerships
The BCU Response • New ways of doing research and policy • Building a new model of interdisciplinarity • Bridging the natural and built environment divide
Is there a method in the madness? Uniting Spatial Planning and the Ecosystem Approach Alister Scott Claudia Carter, Mark Reed, Peter Larkham, Nicki Schiessel, Karen Leach, Nick Morton, Rachel Curzon David Jarvis, Andrew Hearle, Mark Middleton, Bob Forster, Keith Budden, Ruth Waters, David Collier, Chris Crean, Miriam Kennet, Richard Coles and Ben Stonyer relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme
Building a Team • Birmingham City University- Birmingham School of the Built Environment • University of Aberdeen - Aberdeen Centre for Environmental Sustainability • Forest Research • National Farmers Union • David Jarvis Associates • Natural England • Localise West Midlands • Green Economics Institute • Birmingham Environment Partnership • West Midlands Rural Affairs Forum • Worcestershire County Council • West Midlands Regional Assembly
SP/EA Synergies • New ways of thinking • Holistic frameworks • Cross-sectoral • Multi-scalar • Negotiating • Enabling • Long term perspective • Connectivity • Governance • Inclusivity • Equity goals • Regulatory • Market-orientated
Unpacked • Time • Long-termism • Learning lessons from the past • Connectivity • Flows and linkages vs urban and rural • Multi-scalar relationships and dependencies • Values • Core values and belief systems • Professionals (Planner, Environmentalist) and Publics Building interdisciplinarity across the rural domain
Crossing the Divide • Rufopoly • Green Infrastructure • Community Infrastructure Levy
RUFopoly Building interdisciplinarity across the rural domain
Benefits of GI network • Stimulate economic growth • Protect and enhance cultural heritage • Protect and enhance the landscape, geodiversity and the natural environment • Enhance and conserve biodiversity • Aid climate change mitigation and adaptation • Promote sustainable transport • Promote lifelong learning; volunteering • Promote health and wellbeing
Concluding points for Policy and Practice • built and natural environment is part of one connected system Building interdisciplinarity across the rural domain
Key Points for Policy and Practice • need to develop and use tools and methods that cross the divide rather than perpetuate it Building interdisciplinarity across the rural domain
Key Points for Policy and Practice • Need inclusive partnerships across economy, society and environment • LEPS LNPS emphasize the disintegration although some progress is being made. Building interdisciplinarity across the rural domain
Questions • ESRC grant award under the RELU programme award for ‘Managing Environmental Change at the Fringe’ - ES/H037217/1 • Policy Brief Videos • Rediscovering the rural urban fringe here . http://youtu.be/mCgGAt7V6c4 • Reconnecting the built and natural environmental divide http://youtu.be/9GD0hZ84Ws0 • Enhancing connections by crossing boundaries in the rural urban fringe. http://youtu.be/VA5ejBS3_jI • Managing Contested values in the rural urban fringe. http://youtu.be/F1t1HP-LzUM • Long Termismhttp://youtu.be/TFA8wUrCks4