1 / 1

IMPROVED STUDENT PERFORMANCE through INCREASED TRANSPARENCY ANDERS JÖNSSON

Self- assessment. Analysis of classroom situations. Comparison with professional. Evaluation. Assessment of students. Personalized feedback. IMPROVED STUDENT PERFORMANCE through INCREASED TRANSPARENCY ANDERS JÖNSSON SCHOOL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, MALMÖ UNIVERSITY

mina
Download Presentation

IMPROVED STUDENT PERFORMANCE through INCREASED TRANSPARENCY ANDERS JÖNSSON

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Self-assessment Analysis of classroom situations Comparison with professional Evaluation Assessment of students Personalized feedback IMPROVED STUDENT PERFORMANCE through INCREASED TRANSPARENCY ANDERS JÖNSSON SCHOOL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, MALMÖ UNIVERSITY e-MAIL: anders.jonsson@mah.se If the aim of education is for all students to learn and improve, then the expectations must be transparent to the students (Frederiksen & Collins, 1989; Wiggins, 1998). ways to increase transparency: A scoring rubric Exemplars Self-assessment 3 Context: The ”Interactive examination” An assessment methodology where student teachers (1) analyze classroom situations through digital video... The different stages in the ”Interactive examination” Sample: Three consecutive cohorts of student teachers (n = 462). ...and (2) self-assess their answers in relation to those of a professional teacher. Method: 2004 - The “Interactive examination” for student teachers was piloted. 2005 - Changes were made in order to increase the transparency, for example by providing the students with exemplars. 2006 – No further changes were made. Analysis: ANOVA and Cohen’s d (Cohen, 1988) Results: Increase in transparency No changes made 1Calculated as mean score/criterion in the scoring rubric; range 0-6. Conclusion: Increased transparency, operationalized as the use of self-assessment, rubrics, and exemplars, results in an improvement of student performance. Color Scheme from "The Encyclopedia of the Swedish Flora and Fauna”: http://www.nationalnyckeln.se References: Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Hillsdale, NJ, L. Erlbaum Associates). Frederiksen, J. R. & Collins, A. (1989) A systems approach to educational testing, Educational Researcher, 18(9), 27–32. Wiggins, G. (1998) Educative assessment (San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass).

More Related