1 / 25

B. Juen , E. Mohr, Siller, H ., Gmeiner, V. University of Innsbruck

Crisis Intervention in the acute Phase after Trauma, the client´s subjective needs Acute Interventions after sudden loss: the families´ subjective view. B. Juen , E. Mohr, Siller, H ., Gmeiner, V. University of Innsbruck. Stage or phase models of grief.

Download Presentation

B. Juen , E. Mohr, Siller, H ., Gmeiner, V. University of Innsbruck

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Crisis Intervention in the acute Phase after Trauma, the client´s subjective needsAcute Interventions after sudden loss: the families´ subjective view B. Juen, E. Mohr, Siller, H., Gmeiner, V. University of Innsbruck

  2. Stage orphasemodelsofgrief • Stage modelsassume a detmerminedcourseofgrieflike: disbelief, intensive emotions, acceptance • In workingmodelsofgrief, thetasksthathavetobeaccomplishedare also conceptualized in phaseslike: realization, workingthroughemotionsandreuptakeof emotional life • Phase orstagemodels do not have an empiricalbasis • Research exampleMaciejewski et al analysed a groupof 233 grievingpersonsandfoundthatdisbelief was not the dominant response in thebeginning, acceptance was most dominant in all phasesandyearning was themost prominent negative griefindicator in thefirstmonths. • Over time, disbeliefandyearningdecreasedandacceptanceincreased

  3. Copingmodelsofgrief • Today most reseachers prefer coping models of grief to phase or stage models • Grieving persons have to cope with new and overwhelming emotions as well as with new life circumstances (Znoj, 2007) • Research example, Berne study on parental grief: If this process is completed in a positive way, persons may be more able to cope with extreme negative emotions than others (Znoj, 2006)

  4. Grief therapy • Loss is a life-event thathas a specific, evenbiologicallydeterminedreactioncourseandtakes time. AccordingtoZnoj (2004,2006) therapeutichelpis not alwaysneededanddoes not shortenthereaction. Itmayevenhinderthenaturalhealingprocess (“toomuchgrief”) • Psychotherapyonlyworkswhenthebereavementhasbecomecomplicated (e.g. Shear et al., 2001, Wagner et al. 2005) • “Thus it must bestated ...thattherecanbenojustificationforroutineinterventionforbereavedpersons in termsoftherapeuticmodalities -- eitherpsychotherapeuticorpharmacological -- becausegriefis not a disease.” (Raphael, Minkov & Dobson, 2001) • Therapymeansinterventionsthatshallhelptoconfrontoneselfwiththedifficultaspectsoftheloss. This maybeuseful in complicatedgrief but tooconfrontativeifgriefis normal. • But whatkindofsupportiseffective in theacutephaseif not therapy?

  5. AcutePsychosocialInterventionsforgrievingfamilies • In lower Austria twosupportsystemsareactiveforfamilies after thesuddendeathof a familymember. • Crisis Intervention teamsconsistingofspeciallytrainedemergencypersonnelcometothesiteimmediately after theevent (ifthefamilywantsit) andsupportthefamilythroughtheveryfirsthours (thisispaidbytheredcrossandother NGOs whichprovidetheservice) • In themoreseverecasestheAcuteteamconsistingofpsychologistsandpsychotherapistscancomeintothefamilyuptofivetimes after theeventtogive immediate psychologicalandpsychosocialsupport (thisserviceispaidbythegovernment)

  6. The Study abouttheworkoftheAcute Team • In a studyusing a mixedmethodapproachthefollowingquestionswereanalysed • Quantitative dataanalysis • WhichRiskfactorscanbeidentified in thefamilies? • Whichresourcescanbeidentified? • Whichinterventionsareusedbytheteamandhowaretheyperceivedbytheaffectedfamilies? • Whichriskfactorscanpredictproblematicacutereactions? • Whichinterventionscanpredictsatisfaction?

  7. The Study abouttheworkoftheAcute Team • In a studyusing a mixedmethodapproachthefollowingquestionswereanalysed Qualitative dataanalysis • Whichresourcesaresubjectivelyseenasimportantbytheaffectedfamilies? • Whichinterventionsareseenasimportant? • Whichindicators do theaffectedseefor positive and negative change?

  8. AcuteTeam Cases Analysed • 426 casesofsuddendeathwereanalysedin a quantitative manner • 376 casesweredocumentedby narrative protocolsandanalysedby qualitative contentanalysis, 15 ofwhichwereanalysed in a detailledmanner. • In thesecases 1194 individual personsweresupported. In thesecasesitis not possibletocollectdataaboutindividualsbecausefamilies/groupsare in thefocusoftheinterventions. The eventswere in mostcasessuddendeathof a familymemberbysuicide, Illnessoraccident • The families/groupsreceived a onetothree time acutecrisisinterventionattheirhomebypsychologists/psychotherapistsoftheAcuteTeam in Lower Austria

  9. Quantitative Results(seepostersession) • Riskfactorsstemfromthesituation, theperson, previoustraumaordisorder • Problematicacutereactionslikeseveredissociation, panicattacks, severeformsofhelplessness etc. canbeseenratheroften in thefamilessupported • Oftheresourcesthemost prominent arethesocialresources • The teamusesinterventionsaccordingtotheHobfollprinciples (safety, connectedness, calm, self/colelctiveefficacyandhope) • Most prominent aretheinterventionspromotingself (colllective) efficacyandcalminginterventions • Onlythesituationalfactorscanpredictproblematicreactions in theacutephase (especiallyviolenteventsandaccidentswithneardeathsituations) • Satisfactioncanbestbepredictedbycalminginterventions

  10. Qualitative resultsSubjectivelyperceivedresources • Beingabletotalktosomebodyfrom outside • Connectednesswithfamilyandfriends • Socialintegration (tohave a networkoffriends, school, broadersocialnetwork) • Tobeabletotakeresponsibilityforthefamily • Personal resources (creativityandrituals)

  11. Beingabletotalktosomeonefrom outside • Totalkaboutthedeathcan bring stress reduction • Itcan also enhancethefeelingofselfefficacyandsaftetyifthepersontowhomyoutalkcanbetrustedandisabletogivepsychoeducation • Safetycanbeenhancedifthepersonrealisesthatthehorribleeventwhichcannotbefullyputintowordscanbesharedwithanotherpersonwhobearswitnesstoit (especially in violenttraumathisis an importantfactor)

  12. In thewordsoftheaffectedpersons • Tobeabletotalkaboutdifficultemotionslikeguiltfeelingsandfears • Tohave a personlisteningwhoisobjectiveandcomesfrom outside thefamily • Totalktofamilyandfreiendsisoftenonlydone in smallpieceswhereasheretheyfeeltheycantaketheir time andtalkaboutthewholestory in detail • They find itimportantthattheyaregiven time andspacetothinkabouttheeventand „summmarize“ thethingsthathavehappened • Theyfeeltheycan bring orderintotheirthoughtsandfeellesslonely

  13. Connectednessandsocialsupport • Tofeelconnectedtoothersespeicallyfamilyandfriendsisoneofthemostimportantresources in thesesituations • Also thefeelingtobepartof a broadersocialnetworkisperceivedasveryimportant • Tobeabletotakeresponsibilityforthefamilyis an importantfactor in selfandcollectiveefficacyandhelpstheaffectedpersonstobe not only on thereceiving end ofsocialsupport. This includes not talkingaboutcertainaspectsoftheeventwiththefamily in ordertoprotectthem (especially after violence, see also Yehuda et al 1998)

  14. Personal resources • Creativityisseenasimportantbytheaffectedpersons. Theywritelettersandpoems, theydrawpictures • Theyengage in a varietyof individual andcollectiveritualsthathelptoworkthroughthefeelingsoflossandtokeepcontacttothedeceased (see also Schwaiger, 2011, Duffek, 2012)

  15. Functionsofrituals(Schwaiger 2011) • Rituals canhelptofulfillneedsthatcannotbefulfilledbythesocialenvironment • tofeelproximitytothedeceased, togivethedeceasedpersonspace in everydaylife, to express ambivalent emorions, tocreateorderandcontrol…. • Personal ritualsare not donewhenothersarepresent but only in private • Rituals canberealizedbyactions but soemaredoneonlybyimagination • Rituals can but do not havetocontain spiritual elements

  16. Qualitative results: SubjectivelyimportantInterventions • Tohave an externalpersonwhoonecantrust • Tohavethepossibilityto express emotionsandenhanceunderstandingbytalkingabouttheevent • Tobecoachedthroughnextsteps • Tohavecontinuityand a certainlengthofsupport • Somebodywhoisreallypresent, interestedandattentive • Tohaveenough time (morethanonecontact) • Support in activatingresources • Listening • Gettinginformationaboutwheretogetfurtherhelpandhowtocopewithsymptoms

  17. In thewordsoftheaffected • Tobeabletotalkaboutguiltfeelingsandbeunconditionallyaccepted • Gettinginformationaboutwhatto do nextandhowtogetfurtherhelp • Tobeabletoaskquestionsaboutanyaspectsoftheeventthatisimportantlike, howhas he died, did he suffer etc. • The affectedpersonsfeelthattheybecomemoreactivebygettinginformationandadviceabouthowtocopewiththenewlifecircumstances • Theyappreciatepsychoeducationbecausetheylearnabouttheirsymptomsandhowtocope, theyfellmoresecure • Theysaythatit was especiallyhelpfultoagaintalkabouteverything after someweeksandtohave a continuity in supportfromtheaccidentuntilfourweeksafterwards. Theywouldwishevenmorecontacts. • Tobepresent, interestedandattentive: The feelingthatsomebodycares

  18. Qualitative results: Indicatorsof positive change • Uncontrollablethoughtsaboutthedeceased/theeventhavedecreased • Activeandcontolledworkingthroughbecomespossible: deathis a realitynowandacceptanceisenhanced, ritualsaredonetounderstandandmarkthenextstep • Moodandclimatewithinthefamilyarebetternow, tensionhasbeenreduced • Moodofthepersonhasbecomebetter, he/shefeelsstronger, ismorecalm • Totalkaboutlossandguiltfeelingsbecomespossible • Fear isdiminished • Normal everydaylifecanbestartedagain • „Old“ ritualslikehowtocelebratechristmasorbirthdaysarerearranged

  19. Qualitative results: Indicatorsof negative change These stemmostlyfromthegrievingprocess but also fromthenecessityofrolechange in thefamily after a lossaswellasfromdifficultreactions in thesocialenvironment (negative socialsupport) orfrompreviousfamilyconflicts • New conflicts in thefamily • Misunderstandingsand lack ofunderstandingfromthe outside world • Old conflictsfromthepastintervenewiththeacutetrauma • Mooddecreasesandgriefgetsworse (oftenas a normal phase in thegrievingprocess)

  20. In thewordsoftheaffected • Thereis not such a bigtensionanymore • Grandmacannowtalkabout her lossandguiltfeelings • I am feelingstrongerandbetternow • Old conflictsbetweenourfamilyandthefamilyofourunclebecomemixedupwithourpresentstory • Westarttogo on withourlives (wemeetfriendsagain, wego out again…)

  21. In thewordsoftheaffected • Griefisbecomingworsewhenyourealizethat he isnevercoming back • Youhavetolethimgo • Especiallychristmasis a verydifficult time

  22. Conclusions: Supportingthe normal processofcopingbythefollowinginterventions • Listen tothegrievingpersonandsupportthenaturalgrievingprocess • Forthegrievingfamilytobeabletotalkto an outsiderwhoispresentinterestedandattentiveisveryimportantespeciallywhendealingwithdifficultemotions • Giveinformationandpsychodeducation • Togetinformationandpsychoeducationisveryimportant in ordertobeactiveandfeelcompetentandabletocopewiththe extreme negative emotions • Accompanyandsupportunderstanding in a nonintrusivemanner • Tobeabletorepeatedlytalkabouteventanddeceasedperson in ordertocometo a betterunderstandingisseenasthemostimportantaspectoftalk • Promote connectedness • Tobeconnectedtofamilyandfriends but also to a broadersocialnetworkisseenascrucial • Encourage personal resourcesandrituals • But also personal resourceslikecreativityandritualsareseenashelpful in thegrievingprocessandcansupportthecopingprocess

  23. Conclusions • Positive changesaredescribedbytheaffectedpersonsas a changefromtheuncontrollableruminationtowards a morecontrolledthinkingaboutthedeceasedandtheevent. This processisverysimilartowhatTedeschiandCallhoundescribeasthepathwaytoPosstraumatic Growth

  24. References • Duffek, P. (2012) KollektiveRitualezurTraumebewältigungnachKatastrophen (unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Institut für Psychologie, Universität Innsbruck) • Neimeyer,R.A. & Currier M. (2009): Grief Therapy. Evidence of Efficacy and Emerging Directions. In: CurrentDirections in Psychological Science 18 (6), S. 352–356 • Raphael B, Minkov C, Dobson M (2001)Psychotherapeuticandpharmacologicalinterventionforbereavedpersons. Death Studies 24: 603–610 • Schwaiger, E. (2011) Die Funktion von Ritualen nach traumatischen Ereignissen (unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Institut für Psychologie, Universität Innsbruck) • Tedeschi, R.S., & Calhoun, L.G. (2006). The foundationsofPosttraumatic Growth: an expandedframework. In: Calhoun, L.G. & Tedeschi, R.G. (eds) Handbook ofPosttraumatic Growth: Research and Practice, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum • Wagner, B., Knaevelsrudb, Ch,  Maercker, A. (2006) Internet-BasedCognitive-BehavioralTherapyforComplicatedGrief: A RandomizedControlled Trial, Death Studies, 30 (5) Pages 429 – 453 • Shear, M.K., Frank, E., Foa, E., Cherry, C, Reynolds, C.F.., VanderBilt, J. & and Masters, S. (2001) TraumaticGrief Treatment: A Pilot Study, Am J Psychiatry 158:1506-1508 • Yehuda, R., McFarlane, A.C., Shalev, A.Y. (1998). Predicting the Development of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder from the Acute Response to a Traumatic Event. Society of Biological Psychiatry, Vol. 44, pp. 1305–1313. • Znoj, H.J. & Maercker, A. (2004). Trauerarbeit und Therapie der komplizierten Trauer. In M. Linden & M. Hautzinger (Hrsg.). Verhaltenstherapiemanual (5. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer

More Related