80 likes | 323 Views
Year end summary. Water Dependency under New York Law Public Trust Doctrine in the Great Lakes. Water Dependency. Under NY law, the term water dependent is used in several statutes related to offshore wind. Public Lands Law: leasing of submerged lands.
E N D
Year end summary Water Dependency under New York Law Public Trust Doctrine in the Great Lakes
Water Dependency • Under NY law, the term water dependent is used in several statutes related to offshore wind. • Public Lands Law: leasing of submerged lands. • Land could likely be leased without meeting water dependent test. • Type of use not contemplated in statute. • Coastal Management Program • May affect siting if deemed non water dependent.
Uncertainty • New York’s Current Definition: “an activity which can only be conducted on, in, over or adjacent to a water body because such activity requires direct access to that water body, and which involves, as an integral part of such activity, the use of the water.” • A Better Definition: “An activity that must physically be located in, on, over, or adjacent to water in order to conduct its primary purpose and which, therefore, cannot be located inland.” • Best solution may be to enact legislation specifically tailored to offshore uses.
Public Trust Doctrine • If NY or another state through executive/legislative branch allows permitting to go through, how will judiciary react? • PTD is a common law judicial doctrine affecting all states, acts as a check on self-serving, shortsighted legislative/executive.
Alienation of Trust Lands • Illinois Central R.R. : Landmark U.S. Supreme Court case held that legislative grant of land to private entity was invalid; State holds title to land in trust for benefit of public. • Not necessarily anti-development. State must retain title to land in most cases.
Public Purpose • Any grant of rights in trust lands must have a public purpose • E.g., a water filtration plant, an exposition hall • But not a steel plant. Economic benefit not enough. • Public purpose of offshore wind? • Promoting renewable energy • Local environmental effects(e.g., less coal emissions) • Climate Change • Studies have shown detriment to Great Lakes • Not merely an economic benefit.
Courts vs. Legislature • Legislative Declaration: Not necessarily enough. • Evidence that the courts will give some deference to legislature. • Open, recorded process. • All policy considerations taken into account. • Public uses cannot be impaired • Traditional uses: navigation, fishing, commerce. • Modern uses: includes ecological, environmental aspects.
Conlusion • GLWC may wish to suggest each state enact a comprehensive legislative scheme for leasing lands for offshore wind projects to ensure states comply with both public trust obligations and alleviate uncertainty w/ water dependency requirements.