1 / 23

FY 2013 Scientist Survey compiled 10/26-12/10/2012

FY 2013 Scientist Survey compiled 10/26-12/10/2012. Peter H. Garbincius Dean Hoffer Bridgette Fricks December 11, 2012 rev Feb 19, 2013 Thank you to All Scientists – 100% participation! Jon Bakken (Computing) & Laurie Pederson (WDRS)

minor
Download Presentation

FY 2013 Scientist Survey compiled 10/26-12/10/2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FY 2013 Scientist Surveycompiled 10/26-12/10/2012 Peter H. Garbincius Dean Hoffer Bridgette Fricks December 11, 2012 rev Feb 19, 2013 Thank you to All Scientists – 100% participation! Jon Bakken (Computing) & Laurie Pederson (WDRS) http://www.fnal.gov/directorate/OIP/OHAP/SciS/index.htm

  2. notes • Unless stated otherwise, all numbers are in FTEs • For scientists who started or departed in FY 2012, their effort was pro-rated for time served in FY 12 • For scientists who departed in FY 2012, their projected FY12 efforts from the FY 2012 Scientist Survey were used. • This survey doesn’t backfill for future departures, except for a continuing (future) Director & extending the terms of Associate Scientists • At the request of the Deputy Director, some time plots will NOT include Applications Physicists. These will be clearly labeled

  3. Total # Scientists – FTEs(incl. Applications Physicists)

  4. Total # Scientists – FTEs(incl. Applications Physicists) FY 2012 → 13 swing in Scientist headcount is - 25 and + 9 = - 16 net 0.5% per yr attrition FY 13 → 17

  5. comings and goings in FY 2012 • 25 departed: • 1 Applications Physicist I • 7 Applications Physicists II • 2 Associate Scientists • 5 Scientists II • 3 Scientists III • 5 Applied Scientists II • 1 Associate Lab Director • 1 Joint Appointee • 9 joined: • 7 Associate Scientists • 1 Scientist I • 1 Scientist II • What’s happened so far in FY 2013? thru end Dec 2012: • added: 2 Applications Physicists I

  6. # Scientists – FTEsNOT including Applications Physicists

  7. # Scientists – FTEsNOT including Applications Physicists

  8. Job Category

  9. Area – FY 2013

  10. R&D type – FY 2013

  11. Concentration – FY 2013 see details see details

  12. Accelerator Development FY 2013 Other FY 2013

  13. Last year, the Director requested this breakdown

  14. Total FY 2013 = 257 FTEs Lab Management 1 + 2 + 3 = 27.6 FTEs

  15. data examples Names have been changed to protect the innocent.

  16. data examples Names have been changed to protect the innocent.

  17. just one example

  18. Lessons Learned • Continue to updated List of activities  “other” • Provide more easily used lowest-level descriptors, e.g. Theory | Theory | Theory | Intensity Frontier → Theory | Theory | Theory | Intensity Frontier Theory • Operations • Need to bug people to complete & correct & specify “other” • Change of Services Account Principal for 1 scientist! • Web-based form & updates • Bottleneck with many users right at start • A few non-reproducible claims of “not working” • No sequencing or time stamping of web info entry making it difficult to track changes • Merge 3 data files => private PHG & OIP db • Data just submitted by web → PHG hand corrections needed • Hand-treat scientists departed in FY2012 • Normalize FTEs for scientists starting in FY2012

  19. lots of additional studies and statistics are possible!e.g. correlate with prior surveys and actual FTEs from time cards for prior FYsPeter

More Related