230 likes | 351 Views
Constraints on cosmological parameters from the 6dF Galaxy Survey. Matthew Colless 6dFGS Workshop 11 July 2003. What can the 6dFGS tell us?.
E N D
Constraints on cosmological parameters from the 6dF Galaxy Survey Matthew Colless 6dFGS Workshop 11 July 2003
What can the 6dFGS tell us? • Strong constraints on cosmological parameters result from combining the wide range of existing datasets: 2dFGRS/SDSS, WMAP, distant SNe, Lyman forest, weak lensing… • Given this plethora of data, what can the 6dFGS add? • Specifically, what advantage does the combination of redshift and peculiar velocity information give? • The answers presented here are based on… “Prospects for galaxy-mass relations from the 6dF Galaxy Redshift & Peculiar Velocity survey” Dan Burkey & Andy Taylor
z-surveys and v-surveys • Galaxy redshift surveys: simple, quick and easy (ha!) so can be very large, but… • unknown ‘bias’ linking galaxies to the matter distribution; • z-space distortion mixes Hubble expansion and peculiar velocities (both positive and negative consequences). • Peculiar velocity surveys are the best way to map the matter distribution, but… • measuring v’s is difficult and time-consuming; • only works nearby, so surveys must cover large areas; • hence v-surveys are generally small (~1000 objects), or eclectic compilations of different samples and methods.
The 6dF Galaxy Survey • The 6dFGS is designed to be the first of a new generation of combined z+v-surveys, combining… • A NIR-selected redshift survey of the local universe. • A peculiar velocity survey using Dn- distances. • Survey strategy… • survey whole southern sky with |b|>10° • primary z-survey sample: 2MASS galaxies to Ktot<12.75 • (secondary samples: H<13, J<13.75, r<15.7, b<17) • (additional samples: sources from radio, X-ray, IRAS…) • v-survey sample: ~15,000 brightest early-type galaxies
The Fisher information matrix • The information in a survey of a random field (r) parameterised by ; if the field is Gaussian, then • where the power spectrum P is defined by • and the effective volume of the survey is • The covariance of the discretely sampled field is • For P(k) the uncertainty is: (Fisher matrix)
Properties of the Fisher matrix • The Fisher matrix, F, … • has the conditional error for a parameter on its diagonal; • gives the marginalized error for the ith parameter as • gives the correlation between measured parameters as • the variance in maximum likelihood (minimum variance) parameter estimates is the marginalized error from F. • for multiple fields, the covariance matrices of each can be combined to give a joint Fisher matrix.
Application to surveys • Burkey & Taylor use the Fisher matrix methods to estimate the uncertainties in estimating cosmological parameters from z- and v-surveys and z+v-surveys. • The fields are the z-space density perturbations and the radial gradient of the radial peculiar velocities. • The auto- and cross-power spectra of these fields are specified by: the matter power spectrum Pmm(k), the bias parameter bPgg/Pmm=bL2+2/Pmm, the linear redshift-space distortion parameter Ω0.6/b, the Hubble constant H0.
Parameters of model • The cosmological parameters used to specify the cosmological model are: • the amplitude of the galaxy power spectrum, Ag = b Am • the power spectrum shape parameter, = mh • the redshift-space distortion parameter, Ω0.6/b • the mass density in baryons, b (or b = bh2) • the correlation between luminous and dark matter, rg • Parameters not considered are: • the index of the primordial mass spectrum, n (= -1) • the small-scale pairwise velocity dispersion, v
Parameters of survey • The parameters of the survey itself enter through the noise terms: • the level of shot noise is determined by the number density of galaxies, ng(r), in the z- and v-surveys; • the fractional error in the Dn-s relation determines the precision of the peculiar velocities. • For the z-survey the operational parameters are sky coverage, fsky; sampling fraction, a; median depth rm • For the v-survey the operational parameters are the equivalent set plus s0
fsky=0.25 =1 fsky=0.5 fsky=0.75 fsky=1.0 Optimal z-survey design • B&T first employ this machinery to determine the depth of a redshift survey that minimizes the error in Ag in fixed time. • Other things being equal, want largest possible fsky • If Klim 5logrm - 0.255 optimum hemisphere survey has Klim=11.8, a=0.7, rm= 255 Mpc/h • Compare with 6dFGS, which has Klim=12.75, a<0.9, rm=150 Mpc/h
Recovered power spectrum Effective volume Linear PS for optimal survey, lnk=0.5 bands shot noise/mode
Parameter degeneracies • Degeneracies can be seen by comparing derivatives of the PS w.r.t. the various parameters. • Similar curves mean almost degenerate parameters. • Ag, , and rg are all ~constant and so ~degenerate. • and b are also similar (both relate to damping of the PS); the effective shape is eff = exp(-2bh)
Density field parameters - 1 • Models with Ag, , • At kmax~0.2 h/Mpc (limit set by non-linear clustering) the uncertainties are 2-3% on all three parameters. • Correlations are: • very strong between and (a change in amplitude can be mimicked by a change in scale); • moderate between Ag and , with Ag~Amm0.6. Fractional marginalized uncertainties Correlations Maximum wavenumber (k/h Mpc-1)
Density field parameters - 2 • Models with Ag, , , rg • Ag, are unaffected (errors of 2-3%), but uncertainties on, rg are much larger (~35%) • This is due to the strong correlation between and rg, which results because both parameters affect the normalization of the galaxy PS Fractional marginalized uncertainties Correlations
Peculiar velocity power spectrum • Expected 6dFGS 3D velocity PS, lnk=0.5 bands (+effective volume) • Larger errors reflect smaller size of survey and 1D peculiar velocities • Effective volume for each mode is also shown
6dFGS Optimal v-survey design • ‘Optimal’ survey minimizes the error in Av in given time • For various fixed fsky, the figure shows the error in Av in terms of the single free parameter, the degenerate variable 0/1/2. fsky 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 20% distances from Dn- • Distance errors dominate, and need to be minimized. • Sampling should be as complete as possible. • Large sky fractions help, but don’t gain linearly. • The 6dFGS v-survey should give Av to about 25%.
Velocity field parameters • Models with Av, . • At kmax~0.2 h/Mpc (limit set by non-linear clustering) the uncertainties are ~25% on both parameters. • Av and are strongly anti-correlated (change in normalization can be mimicked by a shift in scale). Fractional marginalized uncertainties Correlation
Joint z+v-survey constraints - 1 • Combine z- and v-survey data and estimate joint constraints from overall Fisher matrix. • For models with Ag, , the errors are still 2-3% in all three. • This is very similar to z-survey, as v-survey does not break the main Ag- degeneracy. z-onlyz+v 1 contours on pairs of parameters
Joint z+v-survey constraints - 2 • For models with Ag, , , rg the errors are still 2-3% in the first three, but <2% in rg. • Ag, are unchanged by v-survey and has degraded slightly (due to residual correlation with rg). • The v-survey greatly improves the joint constraint on and rg, which are now only relatively weakly correlated. z-onlyz+v 1 contours on pairs of parameters
Scale constraints on rg and b • Do the bias or the galaxy/mass correlation vary with scale? • Figure shows errors on band estimates of rg and b (each assuming the other is fixed). Errors in bands(bands shown by dots) • If b is fixed, variations in rg can be measured at 5-10% level. • If rg is fixed, variations in b can be measured at the few % level over a wide range of scales.
Conclusions • In terms of constraining cosmological parameters, the major advantage of the 6dFGS is combining the redshift and peculiar velocity surveys to… • Break the degeneracy between the redshift-space distortion parameter =0.6/b and the galaxy-mass correlation parameter rg. • Measure the four parameters Ag, , and rg with precisions of between 1% and 3%. • Measure the variation of rg and b with scale to within a few % over a wide range of scales.