1 / 45

It’s a Jungle Out There!

It’s a Jungle Out There! . Lions and Tigers and Monitors, Oh My!. Kim C. Komisar, Ph.D., Administrator Demetria Harvell, Program Specialist. Topics. 2007 – 08 Monitoring processes State summary 2008 – 09 Guiding forces Monitoring processes District general supervision plans.

misha
Download Presentation

It’s a Jungle Out There!

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. It’s a Jungle Out There! Lions and Tigers and Monitors, Oh My! Kim C. Komisar, Ph.D., Administrator Demetria Harvell, Program Specialist

  2. Topics • 2007 – 08 • Monitoring processes • State summary • 2008 – 09 • Guiding forces • Monitoring processes • District general supervision plans

  3. 2007-08 Procedures • Finding of noncompliance • One or more incidents of noncompliance • On a given standard • In a given district • Correction of noncompliance • As soon as possible • But in no case longer than one year from identification

  4. 2007-08 Procedures • Goal – 100% • Substantially compliant – 95% • BUT – Remember, allnoncompliance must be corrected

  5. 2007-08 Procedures • 72 LEAs participated • February 22, 2008 • Preliminary reports disseminated • April 25, 2008 • Correction for individual students • Submission of CAP, if needed

  6. 2007-08 Procedures • Spring 2008 • Validation completed • Findings and CAPs adjusted if needed • May 31, 2008 • Final reports disseminated • December 22, 2008 • Final status report for CAPs due

  7. 2007-08 Procedures • February 21, 2009 • “Drop-dead date” for substantial compliance • State must report additional actions taken to bring LEA into compliance • SEA/LEA determinations

  8. 2007-08 State Summary • Present levels of academic achievement and functional performance address the student’s needs resulting from the disability • 64% of districts identified NC • 42% systemic

  9. 2007-08 State Summary • Measurable annual goals and short-term objectives or benchmarks designed to meet the student’s needs that result from the disability • 69% of districts identified NC • 37% systemic

  10. 2007-08 State Summary • Alignment among present level statement, annual goals and STOs or benchmarks, and services • 43% of districts identified NC • 18% systemic

  11. 2007-08 State Summary • S. 1003.26(1), F.S., requiring a child study team to address excessive absences • 88% of districts identified NC (15 of 17) • 76% systemic (13 of 17)

  12. 2007-08 State Summary • Measurable postsecondary goals • 88% of districts identified NC • 82% systemic • Postsecondary goals based on age-appropriate transition assessment(s) • 79% of districts identified NC • 72% systemic

  13. 2007-08 State Summary • Annual goals and STOs or benchmarks that reasonably enable the student to achieve the postsecondary goals • 74% of districts identified NC • 69% systemic

  14. 2007-08 State Summary • Transition services that facilitate the student’s articulation to post-school living • 63% of districts identified NC • 56% systemic

  15. 2007-08 State Summary ??? • Manifestation determination conducted for suspensions beyond 10 days in a school year • 32% (10 of 31) of districts identified NC • 26% systemic

  16. 2007-08 State Summary ??? • If the student did not have a FBA/BIP, one was completed • 45% (14 of 31) districts identified NC • 9% systemic

  17. 2008-09 Guiding Forces • SPPAPR • Legislature and OPPAGA • OSEP verification visit • Lessons learned

  18. 2008-09 Guiding Forces • SPPAPR • SPP 13: Transition IEPs • Newly targeted districts • SPP 1 – Standard Diploma • SPP 2 – Dropout Rate • SPP 4 – Discipline • SPP 5 – 6 through 22 LRE

  19. 2008-09 Guiding Forces • Legislature and OPPAGA Reports • EPs for gifted students • Matrix of services 254/255

  20. 2008-09 Guiding Forces • OSEP Verification Visit • Services plans for parentally placed private school students • Lessons learned • ≥5 records per protocol • Focused sampling • Setting the context – getting to know the student!

  21. 2008-09 Procedures • Level 1 – All districts • SPP 13 – Transition IEPs • Matrix of services • 254/255 for all schools • 251/252/253 for DJJ and charter • EPs • SPs

  22. 2008-09 Procedures • Level 2 – Targeted districts • Level 1 protocols and • Focused protocols for newly targeted indicators • If the district was targeted for a given indicator in 2007-08 • Procedural compliance was not a systemic issue or • Procedural compliance was a systemic issue, and the district already has addressed or is currently addressing

  23. 2008-09 Procedures • Level 3 – On-site monitoring of selected districts • Based on review of district data • Matrix of services 254/255 • Dispute resolution • Timely correction of noncompliance

  24. 2008-09 Procedures • Level 3 – On-site monitoring • Level 1 protocols and • Level 2 protocols, if applicable, and • On-site monitoring of one or more • Matrix of services 254/255 • Dispute resolution • Timely correction of noncompliance

  25. 2008-09 Procedures • Matrix of services 254/255 • Adjusted for out-of-district students • > 150% of state rate for 254 (> 7.26%) • > 150% of state rate for 255 (> 3.12%) • > 150% of state rate for 254 and 255 combined (> 10.38%)

  26. 2008-09 Procedures • Dispute Resolution • # of requests for mediation, state complaint, or due process divided by # of SWDs • Cell size of 4 or greater and • > 150% of state rate (> 0.18%)

  27. 2008-09 Procedures • Timely correction of noncompliance • Self-assessment results (April, December 2008; February 2009) • State complaint investigations • Due process hearings • SPP compliance indicators (11, 12, 13)

  28. General Supervision Plan • Incorporates • SPP indicator team improvement planning activities • Corrective actions based on • Monitoring • Dispute resolution • Resource reporting required through LEA determinations

  29. General Supervision Plan • Single common Web site for • Districts • Conducting and reporting self-assessment • Submitting action plans • Reporting progress

  30. General Supervision Plan • Single common Web site for • Bureau • Reviewing corrective action plans • Tracking progress and timely correction

  31. General Supervision Plan

  32. General Supervision Plan

  33. General Supervision Plan

  34. General Supervision Plan You know the drill…

  35. General Supervision Plan

  36. General Supervision Plan

  37. General Supervision Plan

  38. Timeline • Self-assessment • Completed October 2008 through January 2009 • Results submitted by January 31, 2009 • Preliminary reports disseminated to ESE directors

  39. Timeline • Self-assessment • Correction of student-specific noncompliance w/in 60 days of preliminary report • CAP submitted, if required

  40. Timeline • On-site monitoring • Notification no later than January 31, 2009 • Visits conducted • February – May 2009 • September – November 2009

  41. Contact Us General Compliance • Kim.Komisar@fldoe.org Monitoring • Patricia.Howell@fldoe.org Dispute Resolution • Demetria.Harvell@fldoe.org 850-245-0475

More Related