190 likes | 368 Views
CYBERPRZEMOC I STRATEGIE JEJ PRZECIWDZIAŁANIA. Jacek Pyżalski Bullying & Cyberbullying – the representative study of Polish adolescents. Info on CAN project. We CAN! – Cyberbullying Action Network for Parents’ Education. Partners. Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine , Poland
E N D
CYBERPRZEMOC I STRATEGIE JEJ PRZECIWDZIAŁANIA Jacek Pyżalski Bullying & Cyberbullying – the representative study of Polish adolescents. Info on CAN project.
We CAN! – Cyberbullying Action Network for Parents’ Education
Partners • Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Poland • MYKOLO ROMERIO UNIVERSITY, Lithuania • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki – Vocational Education Centre, Greece • IFOS – Istituto di formazione sardo – Training postgraduate courses in clinic criminology and legal psychology, Italy
Background • A lot of cyberbullying incidents outside educational settings • Not reporting incidents – as in traditional bullying • Lack of knowledge in specific situations • Need to cooperate with teachers • Digital gap
Main aim • helping and educating parents to deal with cyberbullying, to help their children and pupils to be safe in cyberspace. These adult learners - parents with low competence according to cyberbullying – is target groups of our educational activities.
Electronic aggression • Electronic aggression- general term covering all hostile acts when ICT (Internet&mobile phones) are used as a tool (David-Ferdon, Feldman Herz, 2007; Pyżalski, 2009) • New tools: what does it mean 6
New quality? • Publication • Invisible audience (D. Boyd) • Persistence • Psychological mechanism: e.g. disinhibition • …but only potentially 7
Technologies • Sending unpleasant text privately or publicly • Happy slapping • Outing • Impersonation • Exclusion
Cyberbullying – peer aggression • Traditional bullying Olweus – regular, imbalance of power, intentional • Different understanding of those features • Different severity of the acts Consequences: similar as in traditional bullying (depression, low self-esteem, etc)
Representative sample of Polish adolescents (15 y.o) • N=2143 • Prevalance and consequences Grant MNISW Cyberbullying jako mowa forma agresji rówieśniczej wśród gimnazjalistów 11
Cyberbullying J. Pyżalski/Grant MNiSW Cyberbullying jako mowa forma agresji rówieśniczej wśród gimnazjalistów/WSP w Łodzi
Slected influencing factors Perpetrators and victims – dysfunctional Internet use Bullies and bully-victims – more conflicts in the family Victims – lower SES
Selected influencing factors Bullies and bully-victims – lower pro-school attitude Bullies and victims – exhausted by learning Bullies and victims – lower grades Bullies – pro-violence peer group Bullies and victims – no friends Bullies and bully-victims – no online norms at school and in a family
Important • Only 9% of vivtims reported the proopblem to teachers and 29% to parents • 37% of the respondents have sent something as a joke that ended up a suffering for other people
What to do in family context • Knowledge • Positive Internet use – together! • Norms and resonable control • Technical solutions
Jacek Pyżalskipyzalski@poczta.onet.pl Thank you.