1 / 26

Delta Airlines an Intervention

Delta Airlines an Intervention. Andrea Fults Catherine Bollig. Delta Airlines Overview. Serves 160 million customers each year 70,000 employees 16,000 flights daily

misu
Download Presentation

Delta Airlines an Intervention

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Delta Airlines an Intervention Andrea Fults Catherine Bollig

  2. Delta Airlines Overview • Serves 160 million customers each year • 70,000 employees • 16,000 flights daily • Hubs in Amsterdam, Atlanta, Cincinnati, Detroit, Memphis, Minneapolis-St. Paul, New York-JFK, Paris-Charles de Gaulle, Salt Lake City, and Tokyo-Narita • 541 destinations in 115 countries

  3. Delta Airlines Overview • Headquarters: Atlanta, GA • Frequent Flier Program: SkyMiles (established 1981); more than 74 million members • 2008—Delta and Northwest Airlines merge, creating an airline with major operations in every region of the world • Annual Revenues (2009):$28.1 billion • Stock Price: $13.87 (as of 04/16/10) -52 Week High at $14.94 & 52 Week Low at $5.31

  4. Delta/Northwest Merger • Do to the merger changes have been made • Addition of another full airline staff • Operation under a single operating certificate from Federal Aviation Administration • Additional Terminals • Changes in Check-in and gate locations • Changes for flyers • regarding booking • check-in etc. • Food service • World perks program integrated into SkyMiles program

  5. Model for Change The Burke-Litwin Model of Organizational Performance and Change

  6. Burke- Litwin Model • Used for “OD interventions directed toward structure, management practices, and systems (policies and procedures) result in first order change; interventions directed toward mission and strategy, leadership, and organization change” (French and Bell, 1999) • For the company to be successful, all aspects of the model need to function appropriately

  7. Identified Areas for Change • External Environment • Current world economy • Organization Culture • Unionization Vs. Non-unionization • Systems • The combining of both NW and Delta employees • Work Unit Climate • Employees with a sense of non-involvement and devalue

  8. External Environment • Current United States Economy • United States Economy suffering from biggest recession since Great Depression • Cost of Fuel is high • Additional operational costs are raising • Fewer people are traveling • Fewer people choosing to fly while traveling

  9. Intervention Recommendation • Survey of Current Customers • Determine why they choose to fly • What keeps them flying with Delta • Survey of potential Customers • Determine what customer expectations are • Why do they choose not to fly • Analyze data for truths • Incorporate customer recommendations • Publicize and promote new additions and changes

  10. What will these interventions do? • Retain Current Customers • Build a new Client base for the airline • Educate customers on what Delta has to offer • Help move the company forward • Increase profitability for the airline

  11. Organizational Culture • Unionization Vs. Non-unionization -work groups' union representation, job security, pensions and seniority at the combined carrier in question -NW has had flight attendants and mechanics, as well as other airline personnel unionized for decades, Delta has not

  12. Intervention Recommendation • Walton’s Approach to Third Party Peacemaking is encouraged -Confrontation: two principals must be engaged and confront that conflict exists (French and Bell, 1999) -Third Party- diagnoses conflict situations

  13. Third Party Peacemaking Intervention Ground Rules • Unions and Delta want a positive result in the situation- each has motivation to achieve this result • Balance of power • Dialogue is open • Each can understand each other • Confrontation efforts in synch

  14. Third Party Peacemaking Intervention Diagnostic Model Based on Four Basic Elements: 1. Conflict issues 2. Precipitating Circumstances 3. Conflict- relevant acts of the principals 4. Consequences of conflict - Requires problem solving and bargaining behaviors • Each party will have different goals and different needs • Expectations can be highly influenced by differing goals and can hinder or help the process, if aligned (Chang and Sanders, 2009) • Cooperation, competition and independence all must be factored in this type of intervention (Chang and Sanders, 2009)

  15. Third Party Peacemaking Intervention • Specific deadline imposed to reached a decision on union status for each employee group by Delta and unions • Pros and Cons of Unions, what happened in the past for NW, how can this help in the future for Delta? • How will this affect employees? • Bargaining for both sides • Legal involvement?

  16. What will these interventions do? • Agreement for both sides/less conflict • Happier workforce • Representation of Union Understanding • Everyone is on the same page and informed • Seniority, job roles, pensions, etc. are no longer a question

  17. Systems • Combining of NW and Delta employees • Merger of two staffs brings two sets of procedures and practices • Leaves employees to question new company’s operating practices and procedures • When two different procedures/practices are operating tension arises between employees

  18. Intervention Recommendation • Survey both Delta and NW employees • What is similar • What is different • Review both Delta and NW practices • Which procedures are most effective • What procedures can be used from both airlines • Outline a new procedure process • Train staff • Re-train all staff regarding new procedures

  19. What will these interventions do? • Give both Delta and NW staff a chance to express concerns • Allows for a feeling of appreciation and helps create buy-in for employees • Pin points practices from both airlines that were not successful • Through new company training: • Helps to unify both employee bases • New practice information is delivered properly • All individuals have same practice information

  20. Work Unit Climate • Employees feeling devalued through non-involvement in merger process • Employees not always receiving all information • Employees not able to give feedback on their needs and suggestions through transition process

  21. “AI seeks, fundamentally, to build a constructive union between a whole people and the massive entirety of what people talk about as past and present capacities: achievements, assets, unexplored potentials, innovations, strengths, elevated thoughts, opportunities, benchmarks, high point moments, lived values, traditions, strategic competencies, stories, expressions of wisdom, insights into the deeper corporate spirit or soul-- and visions of valued and possible futures” (Cooperrider and Whitney, 2008) Appreciate Inquiry

  22. Intervention Recommendation • Appreciative Inquiry • Four Phases (Cooperrider) -Discovery- strengths of organization (small ->large groups) -Dream- envision potential in the future- 10-20 years -Design- create initiatives to bring dreams to reality -Destiny- drafting action plan, mission, vision, etc.- focus on strengths of ideas

  23. What will these interventions do? • Provide happier, more committed and valued employees • Provide opportunities for employees to voice feedback and a place to have their ideas heard • Gain great insight and new ideas from people on the frontlines

  24. Questions from the group?

  25. References • Adesola, Sola, & Baines, Tim. (2005). Developing and evaluating a methodology for business process improvement.. Business Process Management Journal.11(1). Retrieved from http://ezproxy.lib.uwstout.edu:2082/Insight/ViewContentServlet?contentType=Ar ticle&Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/1570110103.html • Alexander, Jackie. (2002). Organizational Diagnostics: Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methodology. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 15(2). 156-168. • Chang, Yang-Ming, & Sanders, Shane. (2009). Raising the cost of rebellion: the role of third party intervention in intrastate conflict. Defense and Peace Economics.20(3). Retrieved from http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/section~db=all~content=a913046811~fullte xt=713240928~dontcount=true#s913046862 • Cooperrider, D, & Whitney, D (Draft). A Positive Revolution in Change: Appreciative Inquiry. Retrieved from http://appreciativeinquiry.case.edu/uploads/whatisai.pdf. • Delta and Northwest Merger. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.delta.com/help/faqs/merger/index.jsp • Delta, northwest approve merger deal. (2008, April 14). Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/04/14/business/main4014360.shtml • Delta Airlines Inc. (2010, April 25). Retrieved from http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/news/business/companies/delta_air_lines_inc/index.html • Foust, D. (2008). Delta-Northwest Deal Grounded. Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/mar2008/db20080318_527222.htm

  26. References • French, Wendell, & Bell, Jr., Cecil. (1999). Organization development. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. • Http://www.delta.com/about_delta/index.jsp. (n.d.). Retrieved from www.delta.com • Johnson, Dana. (2004). Adaptation of Organizational Change Models to the implementation of Quality Standard Requirements. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management. 21(2). 154-174 • Martins, Nico & Coetzee, Melinde. (2009). Applying the Burke-Litwin Model as a Diagnostic Framework For Assessing Organizational Effectiveness. South African Journal of Human Resource Management. 7.(1). 144-156. • Moylin, Martin. (2009, October 29). One year later, delta-nwa merger sees few kinks. Retrieved from http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2009/10/28/northwest-delta-merger • Moylan, Martin. (2010, February 10). Delta-northwest merger nearly complete. Retrieved from http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2010/02/08/delta-nwa-merger-nearly-done • Unger, C. (2010, January 6). Delta-Northwest Merger Nearing Completion. Retrieved from http://www.smartertravel.com

More Related