170 likes | 318 Views
2010 HHMI Symposium: September 23-24. An Apparatus for Optimizing Heat Exchange and Solution Mixing for Cryopreservation Experiments with 2D Tissue Systems : Temperature and Concentration Control. Dr. Adam Higgins Xiao-Yue Han. Agenda. Background Model Initial Apparatus
E N D
2010 HHMI Symposium: September 23-24 An Apparatus for Optimizing Heat Exchange and Solution Mixing for Cryopreservation Experiments with 2D Tissue Systems: Temperature and Concentration Control Dr. Adam Higgins Xiao-Yue Han
Agenda • Background • Model • Initial Apparatus • mixing and temperature experiments • New Apparatus • Construction • Mixing and temperature experiments • Conclusion • Acknowledgements
Background • Cryopreservation is a process for cell and tissue preservation • Transplantation medicine, tissue engineering, drug testing, etc. • Two approaches to freezing cells and tissue • Slow freezing: ~1°C/min, low [cryoprotective agent] (CPA) • Vitrification: high [CPA], rapid cooling Determining toxic effects of high [CPA] is important in optimizing vitrification procedures
Model • CPA toxicity is a function of • [CPA] • Temperature • Time To create a toxicity cost model, it is important to be able to control these variables
Materials • Tubing and insulation • 1/8” ID clear plastic tubing for syringe • Leur Lock tube and syringe articulations • 1/4“ ID clear plastic tubing for heat exchanger • 1/8” thick CarmacellTAP 18230 self-adhering insulation tape (Mebane, NC) • Box materials • 1”, ½”, ¼”, 1/8” thick acrylic sheets • Stainless steel fasteners and nuts • Dow Corning High Vacuum Grease • Fluid control • New Era Pump Systems, Inc., NE-500X syringe pumps • SIMHEX Slit InterdigitalMicromixer • Temperature and mixing validation • Leica DM 2500 Microscope using 20X objective • OMEGA HH502 thermocouple • Dye: 1:25 dilution of stock nuclear fast red (NFR)
The initial apparatus had mixing problems which necessitated an interdigitalmicromixer
Temperature response was poor with the mixing device and outside of the cell water bath WATER BATH SET AT 0°C WATER BATH SET AT 50°C 42.4°C 10.1°C 36.8°C 200 mL/hour flow rate
Our dye experiments showed that there was response delay and longitudinal mixing in the tubing after the micromixer. This tube’s length should be minimized
Flow rate is inversely proportional to residence time and heat transfer
Schematic of new diagram Initial Apparatus New Apparatus
Solidworks was used to design a box consistent with our schematic • Features • Shorter box • Mountable • Micromixer now in box • Shorter tubing after mix • Millable with CNC from 1” acrylic sheet • Liabilities • More contact surfaces • Current plastic top lid lights up in fluorescence imaging
Temperature response was much better with the new apparatus.
Experimental mixing data inconsistent with our dye concentration protocol
Potential Reasons for Mixing Inconsistencies • Syringe pumps stick • Lubricate pumping linear actuator, use low resistance syringes • Replace linear actuators with higher torque actuators • Resistance high with micromixer • Condensation on top lid • Use anti-fog on top cover • Expansion of syringe tubing • Use PEEK tubing (HPLC tubing, more rigid) • Air leaks into water bath box • Use more Vacuum grease, ensure surfaces close tightly by building reaction struts for lid
Conclusions • Temperature is better controlled using this new apparatus. • More troubleshooting needs to be done for mixing experiments • Additional validations experiments necessary • Concentration (as opposed to light intensity) • Flow rate as measured by final volume in discard fluid beaker and time of protocol
Acknowledgements Dr. Adam Higgins Allyson Fry (graduate student) Cameron Glasscock and Diana Vasquez (labmates) Hai-Yue Han (CNC machinist) Dr. Kevin Ahern HHMI