1 / 20

Title One Program Evaluation

Title One Program Evaluation. Report to the CCSD Board of Education August 20, 2012 Bill Poock, Title One Coordinator. Purpose:.

mliss
Download Presentation

Title One Program Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Title One Program Evaluation Report to the CCSD Board of Education August 20, 2012 Bill Poock, Title One Coordinator

  2. Purpose: • To ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education and reach, at a minimum, proficiency on challenging State academic achievement standards and state academic assessments. This purpose can be accomplished by — Title One Program

  3. (1) ensuring that high-quality academic assessments, accountability systems, teacher preparation and training, curriculum, and instructional materials are aligned with challenging State academic standards; • (2) meeting the educational needs of low-achieving children • (3) closing the achievement gap between high- and low-performing children; • (4) holding schools, local educational agencies, and States accountable for improving the academic achievement of all students; Federal Action Steps

  4. (5) distributing and targeting resources sufficiently; • (6) improving and strengthening accountability, teaching, and learning by using State assessment systems designed to ensure that students are meeting challenging State academic achievement and content standards; • (7) providing greater decision-making authority and flexibility to schools and teachers; Federal Action Steps

  5. (8) providing children an enriched and accelerated educational program; • (9) promoting schoolwide reform and ensuring the access of children to effective, scientifically based instructional strategies and challenging academic content; • (10) significantly elevating the quality of instruction by providing staff in participating schools with substantial opportunities for professional development; • (11) coordinating services; and • (12) affording parents substantial and meaningful opportunities to participate in the education of their children. Federal Action Steps

  6. 75% of Title One students will meet or exceed their spring growth target on the MAP (Measures of Academic Progress). Program Goal #1

  7. Grade 2: Goal Met/Not Met? Percent of students meeting Growth targets: • Crest 79%(11/14) • Heights 56% (10/18) • Ridge 79% (19/24) • View 80% (12/15) • Total District 73% (52/71) Program Goal #1 Results

  8. Grade 3: Goal Met/Not Met? Percent of students meeting Growth targets: • Ridge 70% (7/10) • Total District 70% (7/10) Program Goal #1 Results

  9. 80% of Title One students will meet or exceed grade level targets for fluency and comprehension as measured by the spring BRI (Basic Reading Inventory). Program Goal #2

  10. Grade 1 Comprehension: Goal Met/Not Met? Percent of students meeting GL targets: • Crest 78% (22/24) • Heights58% (15/26) • Ridge 53% (9/17) • View 76% (13/17) • Total District 70% (59/84) Grade 1 Fluency: Goal Met/Not Met? Percent of students meeting GL targets: • Crest 62% (15/24) • Heights19% (5/26) • Ridge 6% (1/17) • View 71% (12/17) • Total District 39% (33/84) Program Goal #2 Results

  11. Grade 2 Comprehension: Goal Met/Not Met? Percent of students meeting GL targets: • Crest 79% (11/14) • Heights 79% (15/19) • Ridge 87% (20/23) • View 88% (14/16) • Total District 83% (60/72) Grade 2 Fluency: Goal Met/Not Met? Percent of students meeting GL targets: • Crest 15% (2/14) • Heights 39% (7/19) • Ridge 50% (11/22) • View 63% (10/16) • Total District 42% (30/71) Program Goal #2 Results

  12. Grade 3 Comprehension: Goal Met/Not Met? Percent of students meeting GL targets: • Ridge80% (8/10) • Total District 80% (8/10) Grade 3 Fluency: Goal Met/Not Met? Percent of students meeting GL targets: • Ridge30% (3/10) • Total District 30% (3/10) Program Goal #2 Results

  13. 90% of Title One Parent Survey responses are positive towards the Title One program in the areas of student services provided, communication, and opportunities for family/parent support. Program Goal #3

  14. Goal Met: 99% of Title I parents responded positively on the Spring Title I Survey- “The Title I Program is Helpful/Extremely Helpful to my Child” • View: 94% (17/18) • Heights 100% (16/16) • Ridge 100% (21/21) • Crest 100% (34/34) • System: 99% (88/89) Program Goal #3 Results

  15. Other Parent Survey responses included: • In what ways has the Title I program helped your child? Mark all that apply. • My child can use decoding skills to figure out unknown words. (13/18) (29/34) (13/36) (20/23) • (75/111 = 68%) • My child can understand what they read. (13/18) (32/34) (16/36) (19/23) • (80/111 = 72%) • My child has moved from word-by-word reading to reading in phrases and chunks. (11/18) (30/34) (14/36) (15/23) • (70/111 = 63%) • My child is more motivated to read. (13/18) (29/34) (12/36) (17/23) • (71/111 = 64%) • I notice my child’s vocabulary is expanding. (16/18) (33/34) (12/36) (18/23) • (79/111 = 71%) • What changes have you seen in your child’s confidence about reading and school? Mark all that apply. • My child picks up and reads books independently. (11/18) (30/34) (11/36) (14/23) • (66/111 = 59%) • My child shows enthusiasm for reading books. (13/18) (30/34) (10/36) (12/23) • (65/111 = 59%) • My child reads from a variety of books with a broad range of topics. (10/18) (31/34) (16/36) (15/23) • (72/111 = 65%) Program Goal #3 Results

  16. 63% of Title One parents completed the survey: • 91% for Crest (34/37) • 50% for Heights (18/36) • 53% for Ridge (21 /40) • 57% for View (18/32) System Total: 63% (91/145) Program Goal #3 Results

  17. Parent Policy/Compact: • Instead of annual meeting—hold 1:1 conferences • More frequent updates: • Parent choice • Letter • Email • Phone call • Meetings • Include data from past years to show growth over time to parents Parent Advisory Council MeetingMay 24, 2012

  18. Parent Involvement Ideas: • Family reading night • Make and take workshop • Note to parents in student’s agenda “What I learned this week in Title One” or this week • A day devoted to reading, get students and staff to wear a universal color t-shirt with literature activities (Like America Reads Day) • Motivation to attend meetings – like raffle tickets for Fun Nights? • Parent coaching—how to help at home Parent Advisory Council MeetingMay 24, 2012

  19. Improving our Program: • Video examples of reading strategies—parents and teachers on same page • More coaching-joint meetings with other buildings? • Mini-meetings with specific strategies with parents • More time to Title One teachers to plan with classroom teachers • Funding for quality literature/teaching materials • Monthly communication between parents and teacher Parent Advisory Council MeetingMay 24, 2012

  20. Continue to collaborate with classroom teachers to align instruction • Work with classroom teachers to regularly use assessment data to drive decision-making • Use developmentally appropriate strategies to increase level of performance in the area of fluency 2012 – 2013 Action Steps for Improvement

More Related