1 / 56

Weasel words: Using QR to teach precision in argumentation

Explore the use of QR codes to teach students precision in argumentation and the use of numerical evidence. This approach is supported by the US Department of Education, the National Science Foundation, and the WM Keck Foundation.

moirae
Download Presentation

Weasel words: Using QR to teach precision in argumentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Weasel words: Using QR to teach precision in argumentation With support from the US Department of Education’s Fund for the Improvement of Post-Secondary Education, the National Science Foundation, and the WM Keck Foundation.

  2. What do the Numbers Show?

  3. Examples from Student Writing

  4. Examples from Student Writing “The downtown areas of large cities are often home to copious franchises.” “Consumption of green products that claim to be more environmentally benign has steadily increased in recent years.”

  5. Examples from Student Writing “Nonparental child-care is on the rise as more and more mothers choose to work….” “Americans have not been sacrificing more than the few casualties of our military and the monetary price that war costs.”

  6. Examples from Student Writing Developing a new drug “takes an average of 8 years for testing and costs $802 million for research.” “As of the end of 2005, the three major airline alliances combined to fly 60.8% of all passengers.” “Over five decades …, there have been 12 parliamentary elections….Turnout is often greater than 60%.”

  7. Compared to What?

  8. “The ABC News Law & Justice Unit has calculated that for $67 million Pearson could buy 84,115 new pairs of pants at the $800 value he placed on the missing trousers in court documents. If you stacked those pants up, they would be taller than eight Mount Everests. If you laid them side by side, they would stretch for 48 miles.”

  9. “The Senate on Thursday narrowly approved a sweeping five-year plan to trim a variety of federal benefit programs and to allow drilling for oil and natural gas in a wilderness area of Alaska…. the most ambitious effort to curb federal spending in eight years ….. It will… reduce the deficit and save roughly $35-billion over the next five years ” New York Times, 11/4/05

  10. $35-billion over five years is: • 0.3 percent of federal spending

  11. $35-billion over five years is: • 0.3 percent of federal spending • 0.06 percent of gross domestic product

  12. $35-billion over five years is: • 0.3 percent of federal spending • 0.06 percent of gross domestic product • $27 per person per year in the context of the federal government's current spending of $9,000 per person per year

  13. $35-billion over five years is: • 0.3 percent of federal spending • 0.06 percent of gross domestic product • $27 per person per year in the context of the federal government's current spending of $9,000 per person per year • 3 percent of deficit reductions of 1990 and 1993

  14. Cohen, The Triumph of Numbers

  15. Cohen, The Triumph of Numbers

  16. Cohen, The Triumph of Numbers

  17. The headline: Paragraph 12(!): “Those taking the drug had more than twice the risk of death, heart attacks, and strokes.” Absent: The size of the risk.

  18. How representative is that?

  19. How was the Variable Operationalized?

  20. Who is in the Measurement Sample?

  21. Controlling for What?

  22. Controlling for What? Fact: Those who work with computers earn 15-20% more than others.

  23. Controlling for What? Other interesting returns: Calculator = 12.8% Telephone = 11.4% Pencil/Pen = 11.2% Work while sitting = 10.1%

  24. Desirable Side Effects from Teaching QR Richard Light’s Features of “Faculty Who Make a Difference”: • Teaching Precision in Use of Language

  25. Desirable Side Effects from Teaching QR Richard Light’s Features of “Faculty Who Make a Difference”: • Teaching Precision in Use of Language • Teaching the Use of Evidence

  26. Desirable Side Effects from Teaching QR Vehicle for approaching sensitive student interactions

  27. Suggestions • Explicitly call attention to the use of numerical evidence in assignment handouts

  28. Suggestions • Explicitly call attention to the use of numerical evidence in assignment handouts • Where appropriate, solicit re-writes

  29. Suggestions • Explicitly call attention to the use of numerical evidence in assignment handouts • Where appropriate, solicit re-writes • Teach to the assignment

  30. Suggestions • Explicitly call attention to the use of numerical evidence in assignment handouts • Where appropriate, solicit re-writes • Teach to the assignment • Get help from reference librarians

  31. How QuIRK Intends to Support Curricular Revision

  32. How QuIRK Intends to Support Curricular Revision What do the numbers show?

  33. How QuIRK Intends to Support Curricular Revision What do the numbers show?

  34. How QuIRK Intends to Support Curricular Revision How representative is that? (Are there meaningful subgroups?)

  35. How QuIRK Intends to Support Curricular Revision How representative is that? (Are there meaningful subgroups?) New course creation = $3600 Course revision = $1200

  36. How QuIRK Intends to Support Curricular Revision Compared to what? Course creation grant =

  37. How QuIRK Intends to Support Curricular Revision Compared to what? Course creation grant =

  38. How QuIRK Intends to Support Curricular Revision Compared to what? Course revision grant =

  39. How QuIRK Intends to Support Curricular Revision Compared to what? Course revision grant =

  40. How QuIRK Intends to Support Curricular Revision How is the variable operationalized?

  41. How QuIRK Intends to Support Curricular Revision How is the variable operationalized?

  42. How QuIRK Intends to Support Curricular Revision How is the variable operationalized?

  43. How QuIRK Intends to Support Curricular Revision How is the variable operationalized?

  44. How QuIRK Intends to Support Curricular Revision How is the variable operationalized?

More Related