1 / 9

Workforce Investment Act ˜ Title IB Performance Management System Implementation

Philadelphia Regional Training. Workforce Investment Act ˜ Title IB Performance Management System Implementation. Bill Rabung U.S. Department of Labor ETA Performance Accountability Team. OMB Approval. Increased rigor for measuring customer satisfaction Methodology Response rate.

molly
Download Presentation

Workforce Investment Act ˜ Title IB Performance Management System Implementation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Philadelphia Regional Training Workforce Investment Act ˜Title IB Performance Management System Implementation Bill Rabung U.S. Department of Labor ETA Performance Accountability Team

  2. OMB Approval • Increased rigor for measuring customer satisfaction • Methodology • Response rate • Partnership positions on record keeping and reporting • Documentation • Submission of individual records for exiters • Submission of a sample of records • Individual record… • Timing when required • Identify required items • Cumulative Quarterly Report • Timing and alignment of Annual Report with performance periods

  3. Early Implementation States • Annual Reports • Award announcements • MOUs and grant agreements The Secretary-- (A) shall make the information contained in such reports available to the general public through publication and other appropriate methods; (B) shall disseminate State-by-State comparisons of the information; and (C) shall provide the appropriate congressional committees with copies of such reports. Section 136(d)(3)

  4. Coordinated Incentive Process and Policies • How will DOL work with the Department of Education to develop coordinated strategies and policies for administering incentive grants? (666.200-666.240) • Timing for incentives

  5. Performance Measures Impact • What do the new outcome measures mean to States and Locals? • New ways of defining outcomes • New relationships • State Boards • Local Boards • Education

  6. Additional Measures • How will “additional measures” be developed? (WIA Sec. 136(i)(1)(B)) • Partnership approach to development • Measures to assist States in assessing progress towards workforce investment goals

  7. Update on Negotiations • All States have successfully negotiated performance levels with DOL • Figures are in place for the first 3 program years • 9 of the measures including customer satisfaction were within 5 points for the projected national averages • A consistent framework has been established for developing baselines for state and local performance • State PY 2000 numbers are on USWORKFORCE.ORG

  8. Revising Negotiated Levels • Unanticipated circumstances • Significant change in the factors used during the negotiations process • Objective approach for making revisions, including decisions on needed data

  9. Performance Measures / Program Specific Measures • How are these measures related? • Employment Security (UI = 20 CFR parts 640 and 650; and ES = UIPL 37-99 and ET Handbook 406) • Employment Security Labor Exchange Performance • Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker Programs (Sec. 669.500) • Indian and Native American Programs (Sec. 668.620) • Trade (20 CFR Parts 617)

More Related