250 likes | 435 Views
Assessing alternative energy sources to fossil fuels. NS4053 Week 6.2. Agenda. Review forecasts for alternatives to fossil fuel energy Discuss renewable energy alternatives. Considering the other alternative (nuclear).
E N D
Assessing alternative energy sources to fossil fuels NS4053 Week 6.2
Agenda • Review forecasts for alternatives to fossil fuel energy • Discuss renewable energy alternatives. • Considering the other alternative (nuclear). • Implications of technology development patterns for future energy return on investment. • Consequences
Renewable alternatives • Solar, wind, hydro, tidal, geothermal, etc. • Generally focus is on non-combustible sources. • Pros: • Low emissions (in operation) • Renewable • Cost competitive in high energy cost scenario • Domestic/regional sources • Cons: • Site sensitive/limited. • Time and weather sensitive/limited. • Life cycle analysis incorporating cost of manufacturing not as favorable. • Large foot print (NIMBY).
Nuclear • Regulatory environment • Economics • Waste • Safety • Proliferation issues
Nuclear industry demands subsidies to reduce risk and finance construction. Other energy producers lobby against special treatment for nuclear
Implications for global governance • Consequences of nuclear accident or proliferation are transnational. • Main transnational nuclear issues areas: • Safety • Security • Nonproliferation • Existing safety regimes have gaps: • Participation • Enforcement • Role of IAEA: vital but frequently hamstrung
Nonproliferation • Nonproliferation treaty and additional protocols (AP) • Periodic controversy between nuclear and non-nuclear states over disarmament. • Inspection regime has issues, controversy over additional protocols to NPT. • Concerns over vulnerability of fuel cycle to proliferation. • Is answer multilateralization of fuel cycle?
Patterns in technology development • Logic of s-curves: • Initial development: high costs and low efficiency hold down ROI. • Mid-curve: learning, experience, wide adoption, economies of scale bring down costs and increase returns. • Maturing technology: development plateaus, commoditization of product. • Governments frequently lobbied for subsidies to push past the beginning of the s-curve. • Which energy technologies are at what point in the s-curve?
Implications • Alternatives do not offer a ‘seamless’ alternative to fossil fuel economy. • Long lead time in terms of investment, experimentation and technology maturity. • Difficulty matching energy produced from fossil fuels. • Alternatives do have advantages in easing transition to lower carbon future and higher cost of fossil fuels. • Security implications? Alternatives accentuate shift towards domestic/regional energy markets. • Energy would be less of a global security problem.