1 / 9

Main Objective:

Main Objective:. A comparison between single-edge-triggered Flip-Flop(SET FF) and double edge triggered Flip-Flop based Bit-serial adder in terms of power and speed. Project states:. Literature and investigations. Choosing a suitable DETFF. Bit serial adder circuit construction.

morna
Download Presentation

Main Objective:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Main Objective: • A comparison between single-edge-triggered Flip-Flop(SET FF) and double edge triggered Flip-Flop based Bit-serial adder in terms of power and speed.

  2. Project states: • Literature and investigations. • Choosing a suitable DETFF. • Bit serial adder circuit construction. • Power preliminary comparisons. • Comments & next steps.

  3. clk PLO M4 M13 M1 clk Q NLO D In M5 M14 M2 Q clk M6 M3 clk clk clk F clk M10 M7 Static DET FF PLO M15 M11 M8 In NLO M16 M12 M9 X Q clk clk D A clk clk Choosing a DET FF outb clk SN/SP-BAL-CS Dynamic DET FF

  4. 1D C1 1D C1 Cn S7 S6 S5 S3 S2 S0 S4 S1 1D C1 C7 C2 C6 C5 C4 C3 C1 C0 b7 b6 b2 b0 b5 b4 b3 b1 b S + a7 a5 a2 a6 a4 a3 a1 a0 1D C1 a Cn+1 Cn+1 Conventional not-fully-pipelined bit-serial adder [1] • A sum output every clock cycle [1]. • Single edge triggered based activity.

  5. Dual edge triggered FF-based bit-serial adder [2] • Output every half clock cycle under a 50% duty cycle restriction. • 4 Mux’s were added F 1D C1 a3,a2,a1,a0 0 1 1D C1 1 0 S3,S2,S1,S0 ADD o 1D C1 1D C1 o S 1D C1 1D C1 1 0 0 1 b3,b2,b1,b0 o cy1 1D C1 1D C1 o [2]

  6. Preliminary power comparison results • Aggressive sizing is needed to push the speed of the FF and the circuit. • Moving forward with the frequency is bounded by the adder circuit and the correct functionality of the DETFF. (I might need to switch to dynamic DETFF.) • Low power will be the first priority. • A repetitive architecture (parallelism=> f/4) could be a good approach to lower VDD while maintaining the same throughput. 194 uw 92 uw 116 uw

  7. 0 1 a3,a2,a1,a0 F 1D C1 1D C1 1D C1 1D C1 S cy ADD S3,S2,S1,S0 F F S2,S0 S3,S1 ADD 1D C1 1D C1 o S cy 1D C1 cy1 F o cy1 b3,b2,b1,b0 o 1D C1 o

  8. References [1] J. Yuan and C. Svensson, “High-Speed CMOS Circuit Technique,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 24, no.1, pp.62-70, Feb. 1989. [2] J. Yuan and C. Svensson, “New Single-Clock CMOS Latches and Flipflops with Improved Speed and Power Savings,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, no.1, pp.62-69, Jan. 1997. [3] W. M. Chung and M. Sachdev, “A Comparative Analysis of Dual Edge Triggered Flip-Flops,” [4] R.P. Llopis and M. Sachdev, “Low Power, Testable Dual Edge Triggered FlipFlops”, International on Low Power Electronics and Design, 1996, pp.341-5. [5] A.G.M. Strollo, E. Napoli, and C. Cimino, “Analysis of Power Dissipation in Double Edge-Triggered Flip-Flops,” IEE Trans. On VLSI Systems, Vol. 8, no.5, Oct. 2000.

  9. References • [6] S.M.M. Mishra, S.S.Rofail and K.S.Yeo, “Design of High Performance • [7] Double Edge-Triggered Flip-Flops,” IEEE Proc. Circuits Devices Syst., Vol.147, no.5, Oct. 2000. • [8] Dual edge clocking schemes and alternate edge clocking J.Knight.

More Related