1 / 16

Acceleration – Magnitude The Analysis of Accelerograms

Acceleration – Magnitude The Analysis of Accelerograms for the Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures. Preface

morrison
Download Presentation

Acceleration – Magnitude The Analysis of Accelerograms

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Acceleration – Magnitude The Analysis of Accelerograms for the Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures

  2. Preface The analysis of ground motions (displacements, velocities and accelerations) will be presented, focused to the seismic design. Their validity and applicability for the seismic design will be discussed also. The results presented here, will show that the relationships that exist between the important parameters: PGA, PGV, PGD and duration; and the earthquake magnitude, allow the prediction of the values for these parameters, in terms of the magnitude for future strong motions. These predictions can be very useful for seismic design. Particularly, the prediction of the magnitude associated to the critical acceleration, because the earthquakes with magnitude greater than this critical magnitude can produce serious damages in a structure (even its collapsing). The application of the relationships presented here must be very careful, because these equations are dependent on the source area, location and type of structure (Corchete, 2010).

  3. Table of Contents • Methodology and background • Data, application and results • Conclusions • References

  4. Methodology and Background • The maximum acceleration A(cm/s2) is related to the intensity of an earthquake by a linear equation (Bullen and Bolt, 1985). • The intensity of an earthquake is also related to the magnitude by a linear equation (Howell, 1990). • Thus, a linear relationship must exist between maximum acceleration and magnitude. This relation is given by • Log10 (A(cm/s2)) = a M(mb) + b (1) • where A is the maximum acceleration, M is the magnitude and (a,b) are constants to be determined.

  5. Methodology and Background • For maximum velocity and maximum displacement also exist similar linear relationships (Doyle, 1995), given by • Log10 (V(cm/s)) = a’ M(mb) + b’ (2) • Log10 (D(cm)) = a’’ M(mb) + b’’ (3) • where V is the maximum velocity, D is the maximum displacement, M is the magnitude and (a’,b’,a’’,b’’) are constants to be determined. • Other important parameter is the time duration of the accelerations greater than 0.05 g registered in an accelerogram (time record of acceleration). • For this time duration exists other linear relationship (Bullen and Bolt, 1985), given by • Duration (s) = a’’’tanh(M(mb) – c) + b’’’ (4) • where (a’’’,b’’’,c) are constants to be determined.

  6. Methodology and Background • The Fourier spectrum of the strong ground motions can present several dominant periods (Figure 5). • These dominant periods can be different for each component of the strong motion recorded and for each kind of record (displacements, velocities or accelerations). • It is proved that the earthquake shaking can be most destructive, on structures having a natural period around any period of these dominant periods (Adalier and Aydingun, 2001). • Thus, these dominant periods are important parameters to be known to reduce the damages in structures.

  7. Data, Application and Results • The constants of the equations (1), (2), (3) and (4), can be determined for a location (station) and a source area (a small area in which the epicenters can be grouped). • The data to be used for this kind study must be time-series of acceleration, velocity and displacement,recorded at the same location (station), for seismic events with very closer epicentral coordinates. • If there are not available any time-series of displacements, velocities or accelerations, these records can beobtained from the others using the AVD program. • Table 1 shows the data used as an example. • Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4, show the results of the linear fit performed with the data listed in Table 1 for acceleration, velocity, displacement and duration.

  8. Data, Application and Results Table 1. Near events recorded at the same station.

  9. Data, Application and Results Fig. 1. Linear relationship between maximum accelerations and magnitude for near events recorded at the same station. The critical acceleration considered is 0.5 g.

  10. Data, Application and Results Fig. 2. Linear relationship between maximum velocities and magnitude for near events recorded at the same station.

  11. Data, Application and Results Fig. 3. Linear relationship between maximum displacements and magnitude for near events recorded at the same station.

  12. Data, Application and Results Fig. 4. Linear relationship between duration and magnitude for near events recorded at the same station.

  13. Data, Application and Results Fig. 5. Fourier amplitude spectra for the events listed in Table 1.

  14. Conclusions • The constants of the equations (1), (2), (3) and (4), can be determined for a location and a source area. • The values for these constants can be different for different locations and/or different source areas. • Formula (1) will be very useful to know the maximum acceleration, that can occur in a location, for earthquakes with high magnitudes which have not occurred up to now. • For each building exists a critical acceleration, which is the maximum acceleration that this building can bear without damages (Corchete, 2010). • Formula (1) allows to know in which magnitude the critical acceleration is reached (Figure 1). For earthquakes with magnitudes greater than this magnitude, the buildings can bear serious damages or collapse. • Formulas (2), (3) and (4), allow to know important parameters for the seismic engineering.

  15. References • Adalier K. and Aydingun O., 2001. Structural engineering aspects of the June 27, 1998 Adana-Ceyhan (Turkey) earthquake. Engineering Structures, 23, 343-355. • Bullen K. E. and Bolt A. B., 1985. An introduction to the theory of seismology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. • Corchete V., 2010. The Analysis of Accelerograms for the Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures. International Journal of Geosciences, 2010, 32-37. • Doyle H., 1995. Seismology. Wiley, New York. • Howell B. F., 1990. An introduction to seismological research. History and development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  16. Contact Prof. Dr. Víctor Corchete Department of Applied Physics Higher Polytechnic School - CITE II(A) UNIVERSITY OF ALMERIA 04120-ALMERIA. SPAIN FAX: + 34 950 015477 e-mail: corchete@ual.es

More Related