1 / 13

Day One Survey Results

Day One Survey Results . Feb 21, 2007 Dan Updegrove, on behalf of the SERON Planning Cmte. Response rates & comment. 33 surveys “touched” 19 max answers on any 1 question 17 answers to “collaboration matrix” Some questions skipped Some responses may represent group

morse
Download Presentation

Day One Survey Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Day One Survey Results Feb 21, 2007 Dan Updegrove, on behalf of the SERON Planning Cmte

  2. Response rates & comment • 33 surveys “touched” • 19 max answers on any 1 question • 17 answers to “collaboration matrix” • Some questions skipped • Some responses may represent group • Consider these results illustrative, rather than representative Day-1 Survey

  3. Background • Attendees of “day 1,” Feb 20, were surveyed to assist the Program Committee to determine: • Key messages heard from presenters • Major concerns / opportunities for collective action • Highest priorities for day-2 program Day-1 Survey

  4. Respondent Role(s) Day-1 Survey

  5. Collective Action Importance Day-1 Survey

  6. Additional Caveat • The following four slides contain representative comments from the survey’s open-ended questions. • These slides are not intended to convey the viewpoints of SURA or of the SERON (Southeast Regional Optical Networking) Planning Cmte Day-1 Survey

  7. The Quilt: Attendee Comments • Largely successful in its role as GigaPOP & RON pricing consortium + advocate • Membership growing • Increasing diversity a challenge • Some perceive tension w home base @Internet2 Day-1 Survey

  8. Internet2: Attendee Comments • New governance model more open to CIOs, RONs, researchers; complex; in transition now • New network advanced, costly • Revenue targets unrealistic? • Open to re-engagement w NLR, but has the window of oppty passed? Day-1 Survey

  9. NLR: Attendee Comments • Delivering services at layers 3, 2, 1 • 14 investor-members are RONs or universities representing RONs, who contributed $5M over 5 years • Cisco has played a key role • Smaller, lower overhead org • More focused on RONs & researchers • Dubious about merger, per se Day-1 Survey

  10. PNWGP: Attendee Comments • Long-term strategy, Seattle-centric, with metro, state, multi-state regional, national, & international dimensions • Multi-state med ctr service area key • Big Science to K12 in the vision • Owned infrastructure a high priority • Model for SURA region(s)? Day-1 Survey

  11. Key Concerns • Duplicative national infrastructures • High fixed costs, so unclear that “competition” is beneficial • How to resolve the impasse at the national level? • Tradeoff between national & regional investments Day-1 Survey

  12. Key Opportunities • Take leadership role in resolving NLR-Internet2 “train wreck” • Leverage NLR backbone in SE: DC, Raleigh, Atlanta, Jax, Baton Rouge, Houston, Tulsa • Learn from PNWGP: Long-term vision, creative & opportunistic partnering • Fill in the missing areas Day-1 Survey

  13. Most Important Topic Today? • Organize feedback to Internet2 • Strategize on I2-NLR resolution • Organize to be a force on regional & state networking challenges, today and in to the future Day-1 Survey

More Related