1 / 28

EFRTC June 11th, 2010

Maintenance policies. Bernard SCHAER Director of Contracts & Customers Services SNCF Infrastructure Branch. EFRTC June 11th, 2010. 1 | SNCF INFRASTRUCTURE BRANCH. SNCF INFRASTRUCTURE BRANCH : 3 DOMAINS. 33 , 000 people. MAINTENANCE & TRAVAUX. Maintenance of the railway network

mrinal
Download Presentation

EFRTC June 11th, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Maintenance policies Bernard SCHAER Director of Contracts & Customers Services SNCF Infrastructure Branch EFRTCJune 11th, 2010

  2. 1 | SNCF INFRASTRUCTURE BRANCH

  3. SNCF INFRASTRUCTURE BRANCH : 3 DOMAINS 33,000people MAINTENANCE & TRAVAUX • Maintenance of the railway network • Management of investments for RFF and SNCF • Troubleshooting 24/7 60local entities €3,500 m2009 14,000people CIRCULATION FERROVIAIRE • Timetable management • Traffic Control • Safety and punctuality of the railway system 21 local entities €950 m2009 5,100people INGENIERIES • Rail projects in France and throughout the world • Expertise and project management • Management of investments for RFF and SNCF €650m2009 IG , INEXIA, SYSTRA

  4. SNCF INFRA MANAGEMENT SNCF INFRA P. IZARD C.E.O HUMAN RESSOURCES INFORMATION SECURITY FINANCE TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMUNICATION STRATEGY WORK & MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS & CUSTOMER SERVICES TRAFFIC CONTROL DCF ENGINEERING A.H. BERTRAND Director F.DELORME Director B. SCHAER Director X. OUIN Director

  5. 2 | THE FRENCH RAILWAY SYSTEM

  6. FRENCH RAILWAY SYSTEM AT A GLANCE Other operating Companies Safety body Operators Regional Authorities (fund local trains) Regulatory body ARAF Payments for paths Stations management Infrastructure Maintenance contract State Operation contract Infrastructure Manager

  7. SOME OF THE ACTORS OF THE SYSTEM ARAF ARAFAutorité de Régulation des Activités Ferroviaires D.C.F Direction de la Circulation Ferroviaire SNCF Infrastructure R.F.F.Réseau Ferré de France E.P.S.F.Etablissement Public de Sécurité Ferroviaire • Created in 1997 • Owns the network • Took over €20.4b of historical SNCF debt (SNCF retained €7b) • A performance contract was signed with the State in November 2008 • Created in march 2006 • European directive 2004/49 • Monitors safety issues on the national railway network • Created by law in December 2009 • Regulatory body for the railway sector • Should be in place before the end of 2010 • DCF still belongs to SNCF, however has some kind of an independent status • Its director is named directly by the government. • DCF works for RFF and is responsible for Traffic Control • Maintains the network • Manages investment works on behalf of RFF • A maintenance contract is signed between SNCF and RFF since 2007

  8. 3 | THE FRENCH RAILWAY NETWORK

  9. The French Network Total track length • UIC 1 à 4 : 19885 km ( included 3839 km HSL ) 9969 S & C ( included 754 HSL ) • UIC 5 et 6 13803 km - 7621 S & C Regional lines • with passengers : 11723 km - 4113 S & C • without passengers: 4417 km - 2171 S & C Side tracks 14949 km - 46177 S & C • Power supply • Sub-stations: 535 • Overhead lines • 1500 V: 12 547 Km (40%) • 25 000 V :19 098 Km (60%) Level-crossings 18843 Bridges 40914 Tunnels 1 588 (631 km) Signal boxes 2256

  10. Study of EPFL 2005 The study made by EPFL in 2005 showed • Bad conditions of the network • No optimization of M/R: The share M/R was 2/3;1/3 when it was from 1/2;1/2 up to 1/3;2/3 in other europeen countries • No optimization of track possession : According to the EPFL, track possession duration was too short (1h50) and no technically and economically efficient • No optimization of traffic control : There were too much signalling boxes

  11. What has be done so far At the end of 2005, RFF,SNCF and the French Government came to an agreement of an increasing of funding for renewal

  12. What has be done A model of the network’s evolution has be done These figures show that the track renewal program do not allow to modernize the network Courbes d'évolution de la substance UIC 1-6 Courbes d'évolution de la substance UIC 1-4 Without renewal Courbes d'évolution de la substance UIC 5-6 With Perfomance Contract

  13. What is going on RFF has defined his strategic vision of the network • Definition of freight corridors with high level of availability • More accurate definition of the performance of the network according to the different routes, eg: • Axel load • Speed • Gauge • Availability • Increasing of the slots for TOCs and FOCs • Decreasing of maintenance and renewal costs So SNCF has to improve the maintenance policies, in order to have more trains, more availability, as all Infra Managers do.

  14. Maintenance policies These huge requirements lead to • An optimization of maintenance and renewal, that means an assessment of the policies on each route based on LCC • More efficiency of the renewal • Longer zones • Uniformization • Planning • The necessity of planning and reducing maintenance costs; the best way is to move from an « on condition » based maintenance to a predictive maintenance

  15. Predictive maintenance To do that,it is necessary: • To have a good knowledge of the conditions of the network • To know the parameters which have an impact on the behaviour of the components of the infrastructure • To know the degradation’s laws of these components according to the sollicitations they have to support In order to plan the interventions

  16. Predictive maintenance • The knowledge of the degradation’s laws,eg: Track circuits components

  17. Tools • Development and implementation of measurement cars • IRIS 320 already in operation • Purchase of new measurement cars for conventional lines • Development and implementation of tools in order to modelize the degradation’s laws and so to define « what to do » and « when to do » eg: • Contact wire wear measurement and planning of replacement (with « Catalyse ») • Track geometry quality measurement and planning of tamping (with « TIMON »)

  18. Contact wire wear measurement

  19. Affichage N° support • Affichage des courbes sur différentes années de mesures avec les couleurs correspondantes. • Bleu= année 2005 • Orange= année 2007 • Vert= année 2009 • Tableaux de synthèse classés par ligne • Tableau de prévision de remplacement • Tableau de suivi baguettes • Tableau de suivi des périodicités de mesures préconisées dans les référentiels Seuil d’alarme Résultats des différents calculs (% inexploitable, section moyenne des FC, point le plus bas, homogénéité,….) des différentes années de mesures Contact wire wear analyse CATALYSE

  20. CATALYSE • Différents traits de couleur suivant les années de mesures. • Bleu=2007 • Orange=2009 • Vert= Projection 2013 Sélection des fichiers de mesures de référence et choix de la date de projection

  21. TIMON HSL 1

  22. TIMON Conventional Line Paris-Le Havre

  23. Remote control • Development and implementation of remote control for level crossings Signalling and S & C in 3 Supervision Centers (Paris, Lyon,Pagny/Moselle) Curve of translation of a switch

  24. Maintenance methods Implementation of new methods of maintenance for a higher durability of the interventions eg: • Tamping in BAS • Grinding • Tamping and grinding

  25. X/T Ymax(T)/T Ymin(T)/T Niveau de saturation de «jour» Niveau de saturation de «nuit» T (âge de renouvellement) To To Optimization Maintenance/Renewal X = Coûts de régénération à la date 0 Y(T) = Coûts cumulés d’entretien de 0 à la date T

  26. Models of maintenance costs Maintenance costs are modelized according to track possession and distances between stations

  27. Models of maintenance costs

  28. Thank you for your attentionQ&A

More Related