230 likes | 245 Views
This study analyzes the impact of lowering the alcohol purchasing age on hospitalizations due to assault. Results show increased assault rates among males aged 15-19, with no significant effects for females. The research also examines the effects on the Māori population and highlights the importance of evaluating policy changes before implementation.
E N D
Effects of lowering the alcohol minimum purchasing age on weekend hospitalised assault in New Zealand Applied Research in Crime and Justice Conference Sydney 18-19 February 2015 Kypros Kypri School of Medicine and Public Health University of Newcastle, Australia Injury Prevention Research Unit Department of Preventive & Social Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand
Co-investigators Patrick McElduff University of Newcastle, Australia Gabrielle Davie, Jennie Connor, John Langley University of Otago, New Zealand Funding: Health Research Council Project Grant 2012-15
Background • Minimum purchasing age (MPA) reduced from 20 to 18 years in December 1999 • Previous studies show deleterious effects on traffic injury outcomes – consistent with USA, Canada, Australia 1970s and 1980s • Few studies on intentional injury • Data quality and volume are barriers • No studies of effects on Indigenous people
Evidence on the minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) / minimum purchase age (MPA) • During and after the Vietnam war, 29 states of the USA, 3 Canadian provinces and 3 Australian states reduced their MLDA/MPAs • By 1988 all 50 states of the USA increased their MLDAs to 21 (note the variation in laws by state) • Over 100 studies have been published on the effects of lowering and increasing the MLDA / MPA • Evidence shows an inverse relationship between the change in MLDA / MPA and levels of alcohol consumption and traffic among 18-20 year-olds
Logic framework for reviews of interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving Shults et al. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2001;21:66-88.
Shults et al. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2001;21:66-88.
Aims • Estimate effects on the target age group (18-19 years) and a younger age group (15-17 years) from “trickle down” • Estimate effects separately for males and females • Estimate effects separately for Māori (Mana Whakamārama: equal explanatory power)
Methods • Pre-post design with age control (20-21 years) for economic and other factors affecting drinking among young people • Pre-change period: 1996-1999 (1992 0.03 g/dL law for drivers under 20) • Three four-year post-change periods: • 2000-2003 • 2004-2007 • 2008-2011 (0.00 g/dLlaw from August 2011)
Patients • Admitted to public hospitals (97% of acute injury cases) in NZ from 00:01 Friday to 24:00 Sunday (“weekends”) • Note: no “alcohol involvement” nor any “time of injury indicator” is routinely recorded, thus assaults between e.g., 10pm-6am cannot be identified • Cases: patients aged 15-17 or 18-19 years • Controls: patients aged 20-21 years
Māori ethnicity • Self-identified ethnic group mandatory in the National Minimum Data Set • Can change over time thus ethnicity data are recorded for each hospital admission • Prioritisation determined using Statistics NZ algorithm (NZ Māori highest priority code) • Ethnicity data in health sector collected in same way as Census allowing for valid population hospitalisation rate estimates
Analysis • Poisson regression to model change in each age group relative to the 20-21 year-olds • Exponents of fitted coefficients are equivalent to Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) with the pre-post*age group interaction terms providing pre-post IRRs relative to the comparison age group
Summary • Compared with 20-21 year-old males: • assaults increased significantly among 18-19 year-old males (IRRs 1.04 to 1.21) relative to the pre-change period. • assaults increased significantly among 15-17 year-old males (IRRs 1.08 to 1.28) relative to the pre-change period • No significant effects for females (note lower incidence rates for females 1:4 ratio) • No effects detected among Māori
Limitations • Statistical power restricted by sensitivity of outcome indicator (some cases will not have been alcohol involved) – bias toward the null • Inferences should not be made about trends because of change in ED coding over time –not expected to differ by age and therefore would not bias effect estimate • Lack of effect for females may reflect different victim / perpetrator dynamics by gender (age gap greater for females)
In relation to Māori • No large effects but small effects in either direction cannot be ruled out because of small numbers • There may be differences in informal access to alcohol between Māori and non-Māori that made the MPA less important for the former • Findings underline the importance of government evaluation planning BEFORE major policy changes, especially for Māori (Mana Whakamārama)
Implications • The rate of serious assault is increasing in New Zealand, particularly among young people, Māori and people living in deprived areas • Contrast with trend in traffic injury • For intentional injury (assault and deliberate self-harm) we lack the countermeasures we have for traffic injury (e.g., RBT) • Increasing the MPA / MLDA should be considered for reducing assault
Minister of Justice Otago Daily Times: May 2004
Papers available on request (kypros.kypri@newcastle.edu.au) • Effects of lowering the alcohol minimum purchasing age on weekend hospitalised assault. American Journal of Public Health, 2014, 104(8) 1396-1401 • Effects of lowering the alcohol minimum purchasing age on weekend hospitalised assaults of young Māori in New Zealand. Drug & Alcohol Review (in press 2015). • Long-term effects of lowering the alcohol minimum purchasing age on traffic crash injury rates in New Zealand (under review).