460 likes | 649 Views
Estimation of a Weekend Location Choice Model for Calgary. KJ Stefan, City of Calgary JDP McMillan, City of Calgary CR Blaschuk, City of Calgary JD Hunt, University of Calgary. Overall model context. Weekend Household Activity Model (WHAM) Personal weekend travel
E N D
Estimation of a Weekend Location Choice Model for Calgary KJ Stefan, City of Calgary JDP McMillan, City of Calgary CR Blaschuk, City of Calgary JD Hunt, University of Calgary
Overall model context • Weekend Household Activity Model (WHAM) • Personal weekend travel • Tour-based microsimulation model • Emphasis on activities • Partial treatment of household groups • Same household survey as RTM • Sampling evenly across all 7 days • 2342 weekend households
Overall model context • Part of a model system for Calgary • Weekday regional travel model (RTM) • Personal travel • Aggregate model with full nested logit structure • Weekday commercial vehicle model (CVM) • Commercial vehicle travel • Tour-based microsimulation model
Model goals • Part of 24/7 system evaluation • Benefits to all users • Emissions • Analysis of retail and entertainment facilities • Microsimulation input • Learning for weekday activity model
Overall model structure Tour Generation and membership Tour Purpose Tour Mode Trip and stop properties (including location choice)
Two Types of Tours • Growing • Stops organically ‘grow’, chosen one after another • Hybrid Rubber-banding • Primary Stop chosen • Optional Intermediate Stops • Subsequent stops chosen as with growing tours
Growing Tours Home Stop ? Stop
Growing Tours Home Stop Stop
Growing Tours Home Stop Stop ? Stop
Growing Tours Home Stop Stop Stop Stop
Hybrid Tours Home Primary Stop
Hybrid Tours Home Intermediate Stop ? Primary Stop
Hybrid Tours Home Intermediate Stop Primary Stop
Hybrid Tours Home Intermediate Stop ? Primary Stop Stop
Hybrid Tours Home Intermediate Stop Primary Stop Stop
Hybrid Tours Home Intermediate Stop Stop Primary Stop ? Stop
Hybrid Treatment Out of Town Serve Passenger Work School Religious/Civic Exercise Growing Treatment Shopping Entertainment / Leisure Social Eating Tour Purposes
Trip and stop properties Stop purpose Stop location Trip mode Stop duration
Model estimation • Two-stage estimation • Location attractors • Linear regressions by activity • Large number of zonal attributes • Location choice logit model • Combines attractors with travel and group information • In progress; auto complete (most important one at ~65% of trips)
Zonal attributes • Population and demographic • Age ranges, incomes, car ownership • Education spaces by level • Employment by 8 industry types • Park in hectares • Special attractors • Land use typology (calculated)
Special attractors • Institutions: • 3 major post secondary institutions • 3 major hospitals • Airport • Entertainment: • Arts and Culture District • Stampede, Zoo, Heritage Park • Big Box retail
Land use types • 5 land use types: • Low-density • Residential • Commercial (retail) • Industrial • Employment node • Calculated based on employment and population (mix and density)
Low density Residential Commercial Industrial Employment node
Other attractor functions • Serve Passenger: • Retail, airport, hospitals, education • School: • Student spaces – especially PSE spaces • Religious/Civic: • Population (75+, income), education, retail • Exercise: • Park space, employment, population (65+, income), student spaces
Other attractor functions • Shop: • Retail (esp. commercial zones, big box) • Entertainment/Leisure: • Attractors, population (15-24, income), retail • Social: • Population (15-34, 65+, income), service, retail • Eating: • Retail (commercial, residential), population
Logit estimation • Combining regressed attractors with travel costs and group properties • Generalised travel cost (time and distance) • Presenting one of a set of models • Auto mode • Growing portion of tours only • Represents around 65% of weekend travel
Home Primary Stop Stop Stop Growing tour or hybrid tour after primary stop Stop
Home Primary Stop Stop To cost Stop Stop
Home Primary Stop Stop To cost Return cost Stop Stop
Home Primary Stop Stop To cost Return cost Enclosed angle Stop Stop
Home Primary Stop Stop To cost Return cost Enclosed angle Attractor Stop Stop
Example groups • One adult (30+) • One adult, one kid (8) • Two adults • Two adults, two children (8 and 12) • One adult, one senior (82, nondriving)
Example trips • One adult: • <25, shop • 25-29, entertainment • 30+, shop • 30+, eating • Low income, 30+, entertainment
Auto Stop Model • Sensible results • Costs lest significant for social trips • Return to home costs important, but not as important as to costs • Less mobile members of group add to costs of location choices
Next Steps • Estimate growing tour location choice models for remaining modes (bike and ‘other’) • Estimate models for primary stop and intermediate stop location choices
QUESTIONS • Please Use Microphone