370 likes | 914 Views
Phonology: contrast, complementary distribution. LING 200 Spring 2003. Reading: Files 4.1-4.3. Some acoustic phonetics. b A y. energy. waveform. frequency. spectrogram. time. F3. b A y.
E N D
Phonology:contrast, complementary distribution LING 200 Spring 2003 Reading: Files 4.1-4.3
Some acoustic phonetics b A y energy waveform frequency spectrogram time
F3 b A y frequency F2 voicing time F1 dark bands in spectrogram are ‘formants’ (F1, F2, etc.), characteristic frequencies of resonator (vocal tract shape)
Aspiration in English p h A y aspiration
Aspiration in English • The sequence of events in [phA]:
Broad vs. narrow transcription • When should aspiration be included in a transcription of English? • How much detail should a transcription contain? • Relatively a lot of detail: narrow • e.g. [khAt] ‘cot’ [gAt] ‘got’ • Relatively less detail: broad • e.g. [kAt] ‘cot’ [gAt] ‘got’
Predictable vs. unpredictable information • List-like information • unpredictable • e.g. In English, [kæt] • represented in dictionary • Rule-like information • predictable • e.g. In English, voiceless stops are aspirated (in one context) • represented in grammar • e.g. phonological rule of Aspiration
Broadest transcription • Represents only unpredictable information • Phonemic representation: /kæt/ phonological rules e.g. assign aspiration kh phonetic representation [khæt] • Phonemes: the elements of a phonemic representation
When to use broad vs. narrow transcription? • Typically, transcription is as broad as possible • Symbols in consonant, vowel charts are phonemes • In English, transcribe aspiration only in a phonetic study of aspiration
Phonemic vs. phonetic representations • Phonetic representation • directly observable • contains measurable properties • Phonemic representation • inferred, not observed • abstract, streamlined representation of sound
Inferring the phonemic representation • Evidence from: • Minimal pairs/sets (‘contrast’) • Distributional properties of sounds • When aspects of pronunciation are predictable, due to influence of • Neighboring sound • Position of sound
Minimal pairs • Two words which differ in meaning and along only one phonetic parameter • A minimal pair for voicing • [kræbi] vs. [kræpi] • therefore, /p b/ in English • A minimal pair for labio-dental vs. interdental place • [TIn] vs. [fIn] • therefore, /T f/ in English • Minimal pairs • contain phonemes • are a guide to the phoneme inventory
Minimal sets • A minimal set for vowel height • [hid] • [hId] • [hed] • [hEd] • [hæd]
A near-minimal set • [tyd] • [hAyd] • [hAwd]
/p/ /t/ /k/ aspirated [pHt] [tHt] [kHt] [yupHIk] [yutH] [yukHn] unaspirated [spy] [sty] [sky] [sp] [rt] [sk] [sps] [rts] [sks] Distributional properties of sounds • Aspiration in more detail ( [ ] = primary stress; [ ] = secondary stress )
Distribution of [ph], [p] • [bAy] • [phAy] • [spAy] • ? • =[pAy]
Distribution of [ph], [p] Observation: [ph] occurs at the beginning of a syllable; [p] occurs everywhere else voiceless stops can occur in English Syllable: grouping of consonants and vowels. 1 syllable words: [rIk], [brIk], [brIks]; 2 syllable word: [TIkn]. [.] = syllable boundary
Distribution of [ph], [p] [phe] [phle] [ræpt] [phre] [ræsp] [spe] [ræps] [sple] [ræp] [spre] All the places /p/ can occur in English
Distribution of aspiration In English, • [pH tH kH] and [p t k] do not contrast • there are no minimal pairs for aspiration • [pH tH kH] and [p t k] are in complementary distribution; i.e. • the distribution of [ph] complements that of [p] • i.e. [ph] and [p] don’t occur in the same place • the distribution of aspiration is predictable and can be stated in a rule: • Voiceless stops are aspirated when syllable initial
phonemic phonetic (aspiration transcribed) /pt/ [pHt] /yupIk/ [yupHIk] /spt/ [spt] /sp/ [sp] /sps/ [sps] Allophones • The pronunciations of phonemes which contain predictable properties • E.g., [ph] and [p] are allophones of /p/ in English. • Phonemic vs. phonetic transcription
Cross-linguistic similarities and differences • Spoken languages differ • in phoneme inventories • in rules for the pronunciation of phonemes • Phonological rules usually apply to, are conditioned by • natural classes of sounds • e.g. Aspiration applies to /p t k/ (all voiceless stops) • not /p r /
Aspiration in Hindi • State of glottis in Hindi • [] = voiced aspirated palatal affricate • [ch] = voiceless aspirated palatal affricate • [] = voiced palatal affricate • [c] = voiceless palatal affricate
Aspiration in Hindi • [cAl] ‘turn’ • [chAl] ‘bark’ • [Al] ‘net’ • [Al] ‘cymbals’ • [cAl] ‘turn’, [Al] ‘net’ are a minimal pair for voicing • [cAl] ‘turn’, [chAl] ‘bark’ are a minimal pair for aspiration • / c ch/ are all phonemes in Hindi
Voicing in Mohawk • Iroquoian family; spoken in Quebec, Ontario, New York • Suspicion: [p t k b d g] are all sounds of Mohawk, but there are no minimal or near-minimal pairs for voicing • Is stop voicing phonemic or predictable?
Mohawk phonetic data [V:] = long vowel, [C] = voiceless consonant
Stop distribution # = word edge
Summarized contexts • [p t k] and [b d g] are in complementary distribution in Mohawk.
Writing the phonological rule • Which rule? • Mohawk has /p t k/. Voicing: Stops are voiced before vowels. or? • Mohawk has /b d g/. Devoicing: Stops are voiceless word finally or before a consonant.
Writing the phonological rule • Choose Voicing. Why? • Voicing is simpler than Devoicing • Voicing: “...before vowels.” • Devoicing: “...word finally or before a consonant.” • If Voicing, then Mohawk consonant inventory contains /p t k/. If Devoicing, then /b d g/. But there are no languages with /b d g/ which lack /p t k/. • i.e. voiced stops voiceless stops (an implicational universal)
Mohawk consonant inventory Voicing applies to all of the voiceless stops in Mohawk.
Writing the rule • In Mohawk, • Stops are voiced before vowels. • (sentence formulation) • /p t k/ [b d g] / ___ V • (‘arrow’ notation)