260 likes | 373 Views
Campagna Educazionale Regionale ANMCO Toscana “Difendiamo il cuore”. Dai grandi trials clinici con statine al razionale del target terapeutico del colesterolo in prevenzione secondaria. Valerio Zacà. Monteriggioni, 9 Febbraio 2008. National Education Cholesterol Panel
E N D
Campagna Educazionale Regionale ANMCO Toscana “Difendiamo il cuore” Dai grandi trials clinici con statine al razionale del target terapeutico del colesterolo in prevenzione secondaria Valerio Zacà Monteriggioni, 9 Febbraio 2008
National Education Cholesterol Panel Adult Treatment Panel: 30 years experience NCEP ATP II Guidelines 1993 NCEP ATP I Guidelines 1988 NCEP ATP III Guidelines 2002 UPDATE2004 1970s Framingham MRFIT LRC-CPPT Coronary Drug Project Helsinki Heart CLAS (angio) Angiographic Trials (FATS, POSCH, SCOR, STARS, Ornish, MARS) Meta-Analyses(Holme, Rossouw) 4S, WOSCOPS, CARE, LIPID, AFCAPS/TexCAPS, VAHIT, others HPS, PROVE-IT, ASCOT, ALLHAT, PROSPER
National Education Cholesterol Program Adult Treatment Panel III Circulation. 2002;106:3413-21.
National Education Cholesterol Program Adult Treatment Panel III Circulation. 2002;106:3413-21.
Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90 056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators. Lancet. 2005;366:1267–78.
Implications of Recent Clinical Trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines Grundy SM et al. Circulation. 2004;110:227-239.
Implications of Recent Clinical Trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines ** When LDL-lowering drug therapy is employed, it is advised that intensity of therapy be sufficient to achieve at least a 30% to 40% reduction in LDL-C levels. †† If baseline LDL-C is 100 mg/dL, institution of an LDL-lowering drug is a therapeutic option on the basis of available clinical trial results. Grundy SM et al. Circulation. 2004;110:227-239.
Implications of Recent Clinical Trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines Grundy SM et al. Circulation. 2004;110:227-239.
Nuovi scenari dal 2004 ad oggi… Prevenzione secondaria di pazienti stabili: TNT IDEAL Prevenzione secondaria dopo sindrome coronarica acuta: A to Z PROVE IT - TIMI 22 Prevenzione secondaria dopo stroke: SPARCL Terapia intensiva vs. moderata
Intensive Lipid Lowering with Atorvastatin in Patients with Stable Coronary Disease LaRosa JC et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1425-35.
Intensive Lipid Lowering with Atorvastatin in Patients with Stable Coronary Disease LaRosa JC et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1425-35.
Intensive Lipid Lowering with Atorvastatin in Patients with Stable Coronary Disease LaRosa JC et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1425-35.
Intensive versus Moderate Lipid Lowering with Statins after Acute Coronary Syndromes Cannon CP et al. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1495-504.
Intensive versus Moderate Lipid Lowering with Statins after Acute Coronary Syndromes Cannon CP et al. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1495-504.
Optimal Low-Density Lipoprotein Is 50 to 70 mg/dl Lower Is Better and Physiologically Normal O’Keefe JH et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:2142-6.
Optimal Low-Density Lipoprotein Is 50 to 70 mg/dl Lower Is Better and Physiologically Normal O’Keefe JH et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:2142-6.
Meta-Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials Comparing Intensive Versus Moderate Statin Therapy Cannon CP et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:438-45.
Meta-Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials Comparing Intensive Versus Moderate Statin Therapy Cannon CP et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:438-45.
Meta-Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials Comparing Intensive Versus Moderate Statin Therapy Coronary death or myocardial infarction Cannon CP et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:438-45.
High-Dose Atorvastatin after Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Amarenco P et al. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:549-59.
High-Dose Atorvastatin after Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Amarenco P et al. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:549-59.
Safety of Aggressive Lipid Management High-dose statin therapy or combination therapy will be required for the large majority of very high-risk patients to achieve the optional LDL goal of 70 mg/dl. Rhabdomyolysis was extremely uncommon: highest rate 0.13% with SIMVA 80 mg Vs 0-0.07% with low-to-moderate doses as compared to other statins. Davidson MH et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1753-62.
Outcomes of Using High- or Low-Dose Atorvastatin in Patients 65 Years of Age or Older with Stable Coronary Heart Disease Wenger NK et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:1-9.
Can Low-Density Lipoprotein Be Too Low? The Safety and Efficacy of Achieving Very Low Low-Density Lipoprotein With Intensive Statin Therapy A PROVE IT-TIMI 22 Substudy Wiviott SD et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1411-1416.
Conclusioni • Negli ultimi 20 anni in seguito alle evidenze fornite da numerosi RCTs il target terapeutico di colesterolemia LDL in prevenzione secondaria è stato significativamente ridotto. • Un target di LDL <100 mg/dL con una riduzione del 30-40% rispetto al basale è raccomandato nella maggior parte dei pazienti. • In soggetti selezionati ad alto rischio il target terapeutico raccomandato è LDL <70 mg/dl.
Conclusioni • In molti pazienti è necessaria una riduzione di almeno il 50% dei livelli basali per raggiungere LDL<100 mg/dL. • Per raggiungere il valore raccomandato di colesterolemia LDL è spesso necessario ricorrere ad una terapia intensiva con statina, associata ad un miglior impatto prognostico e ad un soddisfacente profilo di sicurezza.