1 / 49

Cogongrass: Research results from competition and herbicide studies

Cogongrass: Research results from competition and herbicide studies. C. Ramsey, USDA-APHIS-PPQ-CPHST National Weed Management Lab Fort Collins, CO. Cogongrass history. Cogongrass – 1912 in Alabama 1920’s – forage trials in Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida

naiya
Download Presentation

Cogongrass: Research results from competition and herbicide studies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cogongrass: Research results from competition and herbicide studies C. Ramsey, USDA-APHIS-PPQ-CPHST National Weed Management Lab Fort Collins, CO

  2. Cogongrass history • Cogongrass – 1912 in Alabama • 1920’s – forage trials in Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida • Worldwide – 1 billion ac infested • 1979 – 19 counties MS • 2002 – 50 counties MS

  3. Rhizome reserves • Biomass = 8.9 tons/ac = 2,000 g/m2 • Rhizomes are jointed • Rhizomes buried below 8 cm can not resprout • Rhizomes able to reproduce – 2 cm cutting

  4. Defoliation and rhizome biomass • Defoliation – reduces total nonstructural carbohydrate reserves (TNC) • One mowing • reduced rhizome biomass by 22% • Second mowing • reduced rhizome biomass by 38% • Second disking • Reduced rhizome biomass by 66% Willard et al. (1997)

  5. Aerial photos Oct. 2003 Nov. 2005

  6. Field study descriptions • 2003 - Cogongrass competition loblolly pine • 2004 – Herbicide /adjuvant study • 2005 – Cogongrass – loblolly pine root drench study

  7. Objectives for 2003 competition study • Competitive effects of cogongrass and native herbaceous vegetation on loblolly seedling growth and survival

  8. Site Preparation • Loblolly pine plantation located in Pond Creek Unit – International Paper property • Harvested: 2000 • Site Preparation: October 15, 2002 • Planted: March 6-13, 2003 • Pine measured: • 10 MAP – 2003 • 20 MAP - 2004

  9. Herbicides • Tank mix • Imazapyr (Chopper) - 0.84 kg ai ha-1 (48 fl oz/ac) • Triclopyr (Garlon 4) – 1.68 kg ai ha-1 (48 fl oz/ac) • Surfactant – Timberland 90 – 936.2 ml ha-1 (12 fl oz/ac) • Aerial application on Oct. 15, 2002

  10. Vegetation condition • No site preparation in cogongrass • Cogongrass competition - CGC • Site preparation in cogongrass • Mixed vegetation competition - MVC • Site preparation in native vgt. • Native vegetation competition - NVC • Weed-free - WF

  11. First year effects on pine biomass • Competitive effects of cogongrass, native vegetation, and no vegetation on loblolly pine biomass

  12. Allelopathic root exudates • Cogongrass reduces corn yield by 80 – 100% (Udensi et al. 1999) • Liquid extracts – reduced rice germination by 11 – 15%, reduced rice height by 22% (Casini et al. 1998) • Italian ryegrass foliar biomass - 60 to 29% of untreated - residues 0.25 to 8% wt/wt

  13. Allelopathy July 7, 2003 MVC plot April 28, 2003 MVC plot April 28, 2003

  14. Loblolly height growth – 3 GSAP

  15. Conclusions • Stem volume index • 2004 - WF > NVC > MVC > CGC • SVI – 98% reduction with cogongrass competition • Vegetation competition time lag • Pine diameter detected resource competition for four vegetation conditions

  16. Pine restoration conclusions • 100% re-infestation of herbicide treated area by the end of second growing season • Pine establishment window too short for rapid canopy closure

  17. 2004 Herbicide/adjuvant studyobjectives • Determine the effects and interactions of two herbicides and adjuvants on foliar control of cogongrass • Determine effects and interactions of herbicides and adjuvants on rhizome biomass over time

  18. Study design • Four blocks • Outer plot - 5 x 5 m • Inner plot - 3 x 3 m • Spray date - Nov. 4-5, 2004

  19. Site preparation • Cutover site - International Paper property • Harvested – July, 2000 • Site Preparation - June, 2001 • Velpar ULW – 5.3 kg/ha (4.7 lb/ac) • Planted – Jan. 2002 • Percent foliar cover and rhizome biomass • June, 2005 – 7 MAT • Nov., 2005 – 12 MAT

  20. Herbicides • Study design – 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 = 24 trts • Imazapyr (Chopper) - 32 and 64 fl oz/ac • Gly Pro Plus (glyphosate) – 128 and 256 fl oz/ac • MSO conc – 0, 25, 50% v/v • Silwet L-77 – 0, 0.12% v/v • Stimupro – 0.7, 1.4, 2.1% v/v

  21. Herbicide costs • Chopper • 32 fl oz/ac = $51/acre • 64 fl oz/ac = $102/acre • GlyPro Plus • 128 fl oz/ac = $19.61/ac • 256 fl oz/ac = $39.22/ac • MSO = 0, $49, $98/ac • Silwet L-77 = 0, $3/ac

  22. November 6, 2004

  23. Chopper vs GlyPro Plus – 12 MAT Chopper @ 1.12 - 25 - 0 GlyPro Plus @ 8.96 – 25 - 0

  24. Conclusions • Foliar – 7 MAT • Chopper = GlyPro (8.9 kg ha-1) > Glypro Plus (4.4 kg ha-1) • Adjuvants • No effect at 7 MAT • Increased control at 12 MAT • Rhizomes – 7 MAT • Chopper – no effect • Adjuvants – no effect

  25. Conclusions • 7 MAT sampling time – too soon to detect foliar or rhizome biomass effects • Rhizome sampling – 8 replications with screw type auger did not reduce variability • Improvements for sampling methods • Longer time frame – 12 or 24 MAT • Rhizomes – larger unit size – 20 x 20 x 20 cm

  26. 2005 Loblolly pine root drench studyobjectives • Determine the effects of powdered charcoal and seaweed extracts on loblolly pine seedling growth and survival

  27. Site preparation • Cutover site - International Paper property • Harvested – July, 2000 • Site Preparation - June, 2001 • Velpar ULW – 5.3 kg/ha (4.7 lb/ac) • Cogongrass application - Nov. 29, 2004 • Chopper – 1.12 kg/ha (64 fl oz/ac) • Planted – Jan. 2002 • Replanted on Feb. 9, 2005 - 2 MAT Chopper appl.

  28. Root drenches • Factorial trt design – 3 x 4 = 12 trts • Gro-Safe charcoal – 0, 50, 100 g/l • Stimupro (seaweed extract) – 0, 4, 8, 12% (v/v) • Premixed in water for overnight • 1 liter sphagnum peat moss/pine seedling • 300 ml root drench/ seedling

  29. June, 2005

  30. Conclusions • Charcoal root drench • No effect on seedling survival • Trend to decrease survival • Stimupro • Negative effect on seedling survival

  31. Conclusions • Peat moss – may have improved survival • Did not include a control for peat moss • Stimupro may have stimulated fine root growth • Increased root uptake • Increased seedling mortality • Test a larger “split peat moss plug”

More Related