160 likes | 273 Views
WATER PROPERTIES ON RECONSTRUCTION : STATUS HAROLD YEPES-RAMIREZ IFIC, March 25 th 2011. DOWN-GOING MUONS PRODUCTION FOR DIFFERENT WATER MODELS: 10 different water models processed with mupage.
E N D
WATER PROPERTIES ON RECONSTRUCTION : STATUS HAROLD YEPES-RAMIREZ IFIC, March 25th 2011
DOWN-GOING MUONS PRODUCTION FOR DIFFERENT WATER MODELS: • 10 different water models processed with mupage. • One of the models (abs63 sca53 eta0.17) matches with the new official mupage production done by Juan Pablo and presented in the last collaboration meeting @ CERN (https://sbgelog.in2p3.fr/ANALYSIS/516 ). Cross-checks at TriggerEfficiency level: • Production is done, but i`m not exactly sure how to weight and scale such distributions for data comparison Ongoing.
Data Cut (JP): 30880 < runnumber < 38052. (1752 runs) • Lifetime: • For MC: • 365 days for each production (10 productions = 10 different water models) • For data: • Juan Pablo Tool (Wikipage): • Qbasic>=1&&Scan!=1 • For 30880 < runnumber < 38052: • 1903 runs in total! ≠1752 runs chosen. • (lifetime_tool=174.709) – lifetime_set =X • Druns=1903-1752=151 runs • 303 runs ≈ 16 days of lifetime • Druns ≈ 8 days of lifetime. • 1752 runs -> lifetime_tool – 8 = 166.709 days • NEUTRINOS (METHODOLOGY): • Run selection: • 12 lines detector simulation (r12_c00_s01.det): • Data subsample from Aafit v0r6 production (5 line data + 9,10,12 line data). • Cut for 12 lines period. • MC Cut: 30508 < runnumber < 38216.
tcosth < 0.9998 && nhit > 5.0 && nline > 1 tcosth < 0.9998 && nhit > 5 && nline > 1 && run > 30880 && run < 38052 TOTAL AMPLITUDE AND NUMBER OF HITS OF SELECTED HITS IN THE FIT
tcosth < 0.9998 && nhit > 5.0 && nline > 1 tcosth < 0.9998 && nhit > 5 && nline > 1 && run > 30880 && run < 38052 TOTAL AMPLITUDE AND NUMBER OF HITS OF SELECTED HITS IN THE FIT
lambda > -5.4 && tcosth > 0 && beta < 1 lambda > -5.4 && tcosth > 0 && beta < 1 && run > 30880 && run < 38052 NUMBER OF OF LINES USED IN THE FIT
lambda > -5.4 && tcosth > 0 && beta < 1 lambda > -5.4 && tcosth > 0 && beta < 1 && run > 30880 && run < 38052 NUMBER OF OF LINES USED IN THE FIT
w3*(tcosth > 0 && beta < 1)*(1.0/N*1e10) MC tcosth > 0 && beta < 1 && run > 30880 && run < 38052 DATA RECONSTRUCTION QUALITY PARAMETER
w3*(tcosth > 0 && beta < 1)*(1.0/N*1e10) MC tcosth > 0 && beta < 1 && run > 30880 && run < 38052 DATA RECONSTRUCTION QUALITY PARAMETER
lambda > -5.4 && tcosth > 0 lambda > -5.4 && tcosth > 0 && run > 30880 && run < 38052 ANGULAR ERROR
lambda > -5.4 && tcosth > 0 lambda > -5.4 && tcosth > 0 && run > 30880 && run < 38052 ANGULAR ERROR
lambda > -5.4 && beta < 1 lambda > -5.4 && beta < 1 && run > 30880 && run < 38052 ZENITH
lambda > -5.4 && beta < 1 lambda > -5.4 && beta < 1 && run > 30880 && run < 38052 ZENITH
lambda > -5.4 && tcosth > 0 && beta < 1 lambda > -5.4 && tcosth > 0 && beta < 1&& run > 30880 && run < 38052 AZIMUTH
lambda > -5.4 && tcosth > 0 && beta < 1 lambda > -5.4 && tcosth > 0 && beta < 1&& run > 30880 && run < 38052 AZIMUTH
COMMENTS: Is it correct the run selection? It is being well weighted the MC neutrino production?