60 likes | 177 Views
Sales Law. October 1, 2009 Winn. Sales Law October 1. Reading estimate for Monday 10/5 Through page 54, problems through 2-4 plus Questions p. 52-53 Old 1-105, New 1-301, Substitute 1-301
E N D
Sales Law October 1, 2009 Winn
Sales Law October 1 • Reading estimate for Monday 10/5 • Through page 54, problems through 2-4 plus Questions p. 52-53 • Old 1-105, New 1-301, Substitute 1-301 • NCCUSL in 2007, ALI in 2008 approved “substitute” 1-301 (same text as old 1-105) because each state adopting Article 1 was doing it anyway • Review purposive interpretation 1-103 • Compare intellectual property transactions to tangible goods transactions • 21st century commerce: goods plus services plus intellectual property bundled together
Statute of Frauds • The following contracts cannot be enforced at law unless the plaintiff has a writing signed by the defendant • Sale of goods over $500 • Estates in land greater than 1 year • Contracts of employment that cannot be finished in one year • Suretyship [guarantee the debts of another] • Contracts entered into in consideration of a promise to marry
Workmanlike Services • What standard for liability for failure to provide workmanlike services? • Intentionally wrong • Careless/negligent • Strict liability without fault
IPR versus Sales Law • Early modern history: commerce versus real property • Free alienability of property won over restrictions • Recent history: IPR in narrow economic sectors • Article 2: goods versus services a bigger problem • Publishing, industrial manufacturing • Balance social interest in promoting progress of science & useful arts with incentives to invent • Now: IPR everywhere • All rights not transferred are reserved—scope of license not to sue is limited to what owner chooses to grant • Acceleration of innovation, expansion of IPR mean it is everywhere
Ex ante versus ex post EX ANTE EX POST Preliminary Negotiations Contract Formed Dispute Arises Breach Litigation