1 / 6

Sales Law

Sales Law. October 1, 2009 Winn. Sales Law October 1. Reading estimate for Monday 10/5 Through page 54, problems through 2-4 plus Questions p. 52-53 Old 1-105, New 1-301, Substitute 1-301

nan
Download Presentation

Sales Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sales Law October 1, 2009 Winn

  2. Sales Law October 1 • Reading estimate for Monday 10/5 • Through page 54, problems through 2-4 plus Questions p. 52-53 • Old 1-105, New 1-301, Substitute 1-301 • NCCUSL in 2007, ALI in 2008 approved “substitute” 1-301 (same text as old 1-105) because each state adopting Article 1 was doing it anyway • Review purposive interpretation 1-103 • Compare intellectual property transactions to tangible goods transactions • 21st century commerce: goods plus services plus intellectual property bundled together

  3. Statute of Frauds • The following contracts cannot be enforced at law unless the plaintiff has a writing signed by the defendant • Sale of goods over $500 • Estates in land greater than 1 year • Contracts of employment that cannot be finished in one year • Suretyship [guarantee the debts of another] • Contracts entered into in consideration of a promise to marry

  4. Workmanlike Services • What standard for liability for failure to provide workmanlike services? • Intentionally wrong • Careless/negligent • Strict liability without fault

  5. IPR versus Sales Law • Early modern history: commerce versus real property • Free alienability of property won over restrictions • Recent history: IPR in narrow economic sectors • Article 2: goods versus services a bigger problem • Publishing, industrial manufacturing • Balance social interest in promoting progress of science & useful arts with incentives to invent • Now: IPR everywhere • All rights not transferred are reserved—scope of license not to sue is limited to what owner chooses to grant • Acceleration of innovation, expansion of IPR mean it is everywhere

  6. Ex ante versus ex post EX ANTE EX POST Preliminary Negotiations Contract Formed Dispute Arises Breach Litigation

More Related