240 likes | 255 Views
This webinar series delves into risk analysis for portfolios, exploring uncertainty, diversification, hedging, and efficient frontiers. Learn about risk metrics, modeling exercises, and portfolio theory in depth. Discover how to assess uncertainty, compute risk-return profiles, analyze covariance, and explore the efficient frontier. Dive into parametric analysis, market portfolios, and insurance assets, comparing to Markowitz Portfolio Theory. Gain insights into continuous allocations, covariance computation, and constructing the efficient frontier for optimal portfolio management.
E N D
Risk Analysis for Portfolios Analytica Users GroupModeling Uncertainty Webinar Series, #5 3 June 2010 Lonnie Chrisman, Ph.D. Lumina Decision Systems
Course Syllabus(tentative) Over the coming weeks: • What is uncertainty? Probability. • Probability Distributions • Monte Carlo Sampling • Measures of Risk and Utility • Risk analysis for portfolios (Today) • Common parametric distributions • Assessment of Uncertainty • Hypothesis testing
Today’s Outline • Review: Risk Metrics (VaR, E[shortfall]) • Build a portfolio model. • Graph reward vs. risk for portfolios. • Efficient Frontier • Covariance • Continuous portfolio allocations. Duration: 90 Minutes
Risk in Portfolios • Portfolio Theory asserts that: • You can lower risk substantially with only minor impact to potential benefit by assembling combinations of assets. • Diversification • Reducing exposure to individual factors by holding many assets. • Hedging • Pairing assets that react to factors in opposite ways.
Portfolios of... • Financial assets • Equipment (e.g., airplanes, machines, vehicles, factories) • Products or technologies • Projects • Personel with varying skill sets • Inventory of supplies or suppliers
Review of Risk Measures • Measures of risk: • Value-at-risk • Expected Shortfall • State Transition Model exercise (See power point slides from last session)
Prelude to aModeling Exercise • We’re going to build a model of five potential investments with uncertainty. • Each is impacted to varying extents by: • Changes in fuel price • Financial crises • One future point in time (i.e., one year). • Afterwards, we’ll compute risk-return for combinations of investments (portfolios).
Exercise:The Potential Assets • Let: • FPC = Fuel price change: Normal(0,4%) • Crisis = Financial crisis occurs: Bernoulli(5%) E.g., Asset_B :=Normal(3%+0.5*fpc-1%*crisis, 1%)
Exercise:Explore individual investments • Collect the returns along an index named Asset (having 5 elements) • Plot the CDF of all 5 investments. • Use Sample Size = 1000 • In separate variables, compute: • Mean return • Value-at-risk • Expected shortfall • Standard Deviation • Create a risk-reward scatter plot • Will have 5 dots
Combinations of Portfolios • How many possible portfolios (i.e., combinations of assets) do we have?
Exercise • Create and define a variable: Portfolio_return • It should be the average (equally weighted) of all assets in each portfolio. • View its: • mean result • CDF (slicing 1 portfolio at a time)
Exercise:Plot all portfolios • Create result variables for: • Portfolio Value-at-risk • Portfolio Expected Shortfall • Portfolio Risk/Return scatter plot • Explore the scatter plot. • Identify the Efficient Frontier • Find each one-asset portfolio. • For each, can you decrease risk without damaging return?
Exercise:Scatter Plot Color • Define a variable: Portfolio_size • The number of assets in portfolio • 1 thru 5 • Use this as the color in your scatter plot.
Capital Market Line & Market Portfolio Capital Market Line Market Portfolio(maximal reward/risk ratio) Risk-free asset
Exercise: Parametric Analysis How sensitive is the risk-reward relation to the probability of a financial crisis? • Define:Index P_crisis := Sequence(5%,40%,5%)
Exercise: Insurance Asset (Put Option) • Add a sixth asset: • A “put-option” (i.e., insurance contract) on asset E. • Pays for any loss in asset E (even if you don’t own it) • Does not pay out when E profits • You always pay a 1% premium for the contract. • Explore the risk/return scatter plot. • Should you buy the insurance? (“hedge”)
Comparison to Markowitz Portfolio Theory • Harry Markowitz (1952) • Statitionary Gaussian distributions • Mean & covariance matrix • Reward=Mean • Risk=Standard Devation • Continuous allocations • Today’s presentation • Structured models, arbitary distributions • Reward, Risk = Any measure. • Binary (yes,no) allocations.
Covariation • Measures a connection between two inter-related quantities. • Definition: • Computed by Analytica function:Covariance(x,y) • Note: Covariance(x,x) = Variance(x)
Exercise:Compute Covariance • Compute the covariance between assets B and D. • Compute the full covariance matrix. • Hint: You’ll need a copy of the Investment index. • Use the Gaussian function (in Multivariate Distribution library), and this covariance matrix, to create a Markowitz model of returns.
Continuous Allocation • Exercise: Consider all portfolios with some continuous proportion of asset B and asset D: • 0≤w2,w4≤1, w2+w4=1 • rw = w2*rB + w4*rD • Exercise: Graph Mean vs. SDeviation for this set of continuous portfolios • A continuous allocation w = [w1,..,wN] is a vector with ∑ wi =1.
Identifying the Entire Efficient Frontier Theorem (Black 1972): In a continuous allocation, the set of all portfolios on the efficient frontier can be written as: z = c x + (1-c) y where x and y are any two distinct efficient portfolios and –∞<c<∞ is a constant. Note: assumes portfolios may “short sell” assets.
Exercise Find (approximately) all efficient continuous allocations for our 6 investments. • Use the scatter plot to manually identify two portfolios that appear to be efficient. • Plot Mean vs. SDeviation for all convex combinations • Why is this not entirely correct?
Summary • Asset allocation is the practice of selecting mixes of assets to reduce risk while continuing to maximize return. • The “efficient frontier” characterizes the portfolios that cannot be improved upon without increasing risk. • Markowitz Portfolio Theory makes lots of parametric assumptions for analytical tractability. With Monte Carlo, most assumptions aren’t required.