410 likes | 567 Views
North American Regional Climate Simulations with WRF/Noah-MP: Validation and the effect of groundwater interaction. Michael Barlage Mukul Tewari , Fei Chen, Kevin Manning (NCAR) Gonzalo Miguez -Macho (U. Santiago) 14 th WRF Users’ Workshop, 26 June 2013. Domain and Setup.
E N D
North American Regional Climate Simulations with WRF/Noah-MP: Validation and the effect of groundwater interaction Michael Barlage MukulTewari, Fei Chen, Kevin Manning (NCAR) Gonzalo Miguez-Macho (U. Santiago) 14th WRF Users’ Workshop, 26 June 2013
Domain and Setup • Two six-month 30km simulations starting Feb 25 • 2002 and 2010 • Spin-up soil for one year using offline HRLDAS • IC/BC from NARR • CAM radiation; YSU; Thompson
LSM Setup • Default Noah LSM • Noah-MP with OPT_RUN=3: free drainage comparable to Noah runoff scheme • Noah-MP with OPT_RUN=5: Miguez-Macho & Fan groundwater with equilibrium water table • Noah-MP with OPT_BTR=1(Noah) and 2 (CLM)
conductivity Transmisivity width of flow cross section Head difference divided by distance (water table slope) i,j Cell ij Qr R Q2 Q1 Q3 Plan view Cross section view Sg w i, j Q8 Q8 h i,j Q4 Q4 Q5 Q7 Q6 Mean sea level Miguez-Macho & Fan water table dynamics in NOAH-MP Equations: Mass balance in groundwater storage: Darcy’s Law for groundwater – river exchange: Darcy’s Law for lateral groundwater flow: Water table depth (wtd) Fan et al, JGR 2007 Miguez-Macho et al., JGR 2007
Analysis Regions • Based on NCDC Regional Climate Zones • Observations: METAR/SYNOP stations, NCDC daily gridded precip
Depth to Water Table – MMF input Looks similar to terrain Focus of this presentation are locations with shallow water table
Regional Groundwater Recharge: 2010 Noah Noah-MP R3 Noah-MP R5
Regional Groundwater Recharge: 2010 Noah Noah-MP R3 Noah-MP R5
Regional Groundwater Recharge: 2002 Noah Noah-MP R3 Noah-MP R5
Regional Deep Soil Moisture: 2002 Noah Noah-MP R3 Noah-MP R5
Regional Root Soil Moisture: 2002 Noah Noah-MP R3 Noah-MP R5
Regional Root Soil Moisture: 2010 Noah Noah-MP R3 Noah-MP R5
Regional Latent Heat Flux: 2002 Increase LH especially in JJA Noah Noah-MP R3 Noah-MP R5
Regional Latent Heat Flux: 2002 Noah Noah-MP R3 Noah-MP R5
Regional Precipitation: 2002 Black: NCDC climatology Thick Black: NCDC observations Noah Noah-MP R3 Noah-MP R5
Regional Precipitation: 2010 Hurricane Alex Black: NCDC climatology Thick Black: NCDC observations Noah Noah-MP R3 Noah-MP R5
Summary • Tested a new groundwater option to Noah-MP that accounts for aquifer interaction • Noah-MP performs better than Noah for near surface temperature (with exceptions), though more optimization is likely required • Noah-MP performs the same (2002) or regionally worse (2010) for precipitation • In regions with low water table depth, upward transport of water: • Increases late summer latent heat flux • Has little effect on precipitation • Improves surface temperature simulation
Regional Deep Soil Moisture: 2010 Noah Noah-MP R3 Noah-MP R5
Regional Latent Heat Flux: 2010 Noah Noah-MP R3 Noah-MP R5
Regional Latent Heat Flux: 2010 Noah Noah-MP R3 Noah-MP R5
Regional Precipitation: 2002 Black: NCDC climatology Thick Black: NCDC observations Noah Noah-MP R3 Noah-MP R5
Regional Precipitation: 2010 Hurricane Alex Black: NCDC climatology Thick Black: NCDC observations Noah Noah-MP R3 Noah-MP R5