150 likes | 413 Views
September 25, 2012. School Choice. TITLE 14 Education Free Public Schools CHAPTER 4. SCHOOL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT CHOICE PROGRAM. Delaware regulation. School choice began in 1996, the goal was twofold
E N D
September 25, 2012 School Choice
TITLE 14 Education Free Public Schools CHAPTER 4. SCHOOL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT CHOICE PROGRAM Delaware regulation
School choice began in 1996, the goal was twofold To increase access to educational opportunity for all children throughout the State regardless of where they may live. To maximize parental choice in obtaining access to educational opportunities for their children. Title 14, Chapter 4
There are no statewide regulations addressing the school choice program. Each school district is to adopt, and make available upon request, a policy establishing criteria for acceptance or rejection of applications and to set priorities for acceptance. School Choice
Local school districts may also establish (each year, through policy) which schools are open for “Choice” and which schools are not open for “Choice”. Other policies can be adopted by the districts as long as they do not violate the state law. School Choice
Additional revenue for the district at a time when more money is needed to cover current expenses. Assistance for day care issues for families who work Support for the statewide goal of providing parental choice in obtaining access to educational opportunities for children. Fill capacity at all schools Pros
Increased administrative cost – time and money Volatile staffing needs More students riding the bus (perception of “crowding”) and longer bus rides – particularly on perimeter routes which are often the longest runs. Increased discipline issues Cons
Institution of a “lottery” process to ensure equal access to choice Institution of a formal appeal process Possible increase in waivers and class size (K – 3) Backlash from ASD parents over crowded buses and larger class size. Perception that local residents’ taxes are paying to build new schools for out of district students. Fosters ill will and competition between districts. Cons
Will the district move from an annual review process to guarantee that once admitted, a student can “graduate” from that building? (This is current practice in other “choice” districts) Will the district adopt a sibling policy if one child from the family is approved? To be considered:
Will it be legally permissible to discontinue out of district choice when home sales pick up and more room is needed to educate local residents’ children? Will the district allow termination requests for concerns regarding attendance, behavior and academics? To be considered:
Early Childhood Center: 618 seats Elementary: 908 seats Middle: 549 seats High: 510 seats Capacity is based on square footage – not instructional capacity Capacity
In 2009: • 73 students used choice to go to another district • 54 students used choice to attend Appoquinimink • There were 3,680 students participating in the state’s interdistrict choice program. • Applications that are processed are any where from 500 to over 2000 • Choice students range from 80 - 500 Volume of Requests
Choice revenue Per child: Estimating for every 20 students who choice in to the district from outside our boundaries one unit of financial support from the state is generated.