350 likes | 514 Views
EPA Solar Oven Project #05301. Critical Design Review May 13, 2005. Team Solar Oven. Agenda. Project Mission Statement Needs Assessment and Requirements Materials Selection Testing Methodology Types of Solar Ovens Concept Development/Selection Three Generations and Their Performances
E N D
EPA Solar Oven Project #05301 Critical Design Review May 13, 2005
Agenda • Project Mission Statement • Needs Assessment and Requirements • Materials Selection • Testing Methodology • Types of Solar Ovens • Concept Development/Selection • Three Generations and Their Performances • Environmental Assessment • Questions
Project Mission Statement • Design, test, and build a low-cost solar oven for use in Latin American countries using locally available resources, mass production methods, and labor
Needs Assessment: Scope Limitations • Design must be ultra low cost • Design should only incorporate locally available resources, production methods, and labor • Design should be mass-producible • Design must be durable • Design must be able to cook food and pasteurize water • Design must be benchmarked against three commercially available units • Thermal analysis must be conducted on prototypes
Materials Selection* • Main Construction Material • Reflector Material • Cover Material * CES Selector 4.5
Reflector and Cover Material • Offset printing plates chosen for reflector • Cost • Reuse of waste material • Acrylic chosen for cover material • Durability
Testing Methodology • Determine angle of reflectors • Square One software • Laser Testing • Mimic sun’s energy • Create indoor setup • Calibrated solar cell • Test prototypes outside • Thermocouples
Three Main Types of Solar Ovens Box Panel Parabolic
Concept Development Homemade ~$10 Commercial: $120-$220
$33.64 (Materials) Generation I: Four Reflector Box
$15.38 (Materials) Generation I: Single Reflector Box
$19.65 (Materials) Generation I: Pyramid Reflector Box
Generation II-A • Trip to Venezuela • Fabricated 2 units • Single-paned acrylic • Double-paned acrylic • Tested outdoors • Performance • Reached water pasteurization temperatures 65C (149F)
Expert Input • Dr. Nandwani • International Expert on Solar Cooking • Materials and Designs • Utilize glass not acrylic • Suggested suitable insulation materials • Optimal thicknesses • Generation II-B • Retrofitted Generation II-A unit
Generation III • Thermal analysis • Optimal insulation thickness • Increased capacity for larger families • Cost: $32.33
How did we do? • One fourth the price of the cheapest commercial unit: $29.33 (materials + labor) vs. $121.94 • Full price, $32.33, includes a WAPI ($3) • A device to tell if water has been pasteurized • Reaches cooking and water pasteurization temperatures • Uses 36% reuse materials
Recommended Future Work • Slant oven so more direct sunlight hits pot(s) • Research optimal number of glass panes • Explore sealants for weatherproofing • Replace the main construction material, MDF, with a less dense material with similar or better thermal properties to reduce weight
SOS Solar Cooker vs. RIT Solar Cooker Life Cycle Impact(Characterization)
SOS Solar Cooker vs. Generation III 81% 84% 67%
Benefits of Solar Ovens If 1,000 solar ovens are used year-round by families of six, this would save approximately… • FIREWOOD 17,000 Tons • CO2 6,300 Tons • CO 300 Tons • FUEL 9 Million Lbs
Thanks to: Dr. Carrano Dr. Thorn Dr. Mozrall Mr. Wellin Dr. Raffaelle Dr. Nandwani Carlos Plaz Chris Wood Questions? Thanks and Questions
Backup Materials • Feasibility Assessment • Indoor Test Cell