1 / 14

Drawing and applying poverty maps The Hungarian case

Drawing and applying poverty maps The Hungarian case. Open Society Foundations Making the Most of EU Funds for Roma initiative 1 5 Dec 2011. Mapping at 2 levels. Indicators. Settlement level: 2 social : education (primary school), employment Micro-region level: 14 social :

nat
Download Presentation

Drawing and applying poverty maps The Hungarian case

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Drawing and applying poverty mapsThe Hungarian case Open Society Foundations Making the Most of EU Funds for Roma initiative 15Dec 2011

  2. Mapping at 2 levels

  3. Indicators • Settlement level: • 2 social: education (primary school), employment • Micro-region level: • 14 social: • 6 income, property, demography, etc.: income, flat, car, migration, mortality, urbanisation • 5 poverty, etc.: education (secondary school), unemployed households, social assistance, child protection assistance, aging index • 3 employment: unemployment, long term unemployment, activity • 8 economic: number and change in number of enterprises, agriculture, services, tourism, retail, research, tax income • 9 infrastructural: piped water, sewage, gas, waste collection, road and motorway accessibility, phone, cable TV, broadband internet • Foreseen change: smaller number of indicators, more focus on social indicators

  4. Indicators – *census data • Settlement level: • 2 social: education (primary school)*, employment • Micro-region level: • 14 social: • 6 income, property, demography, etc.: income, flat, car, migration, mortality, urbanisation • 5 poverty, etc.: education (secondary school)*, unemployed households*, social assistance, child protection assistance, aging index • 3 employment: unemployment, long term unemployment, activity* • 8 economic: number and change in number of enterprises, agriculture*, services*, tourism, retail, research, tax income • 9 infrastructural: piped water, sewage, gas, waste collection, road and motorway accessibility, phone, cable TV, broadband internet • Foreseen change: smaller number of indicators, more focus on social indicators

  5. Ózd, Hungary

  6. Segregated area no 7, Ózd, Hungary

  7. Ranking micro-regions

  8. dark green: least developed micro-regions with integrated programme (33) medium green: least developed micro-regions (14) light green: less developed micro-regions (47) striped: micro-regions with high rate of Roma, census data (44)

  9. Territorial targeting of funds • Funding • 300 meur, 1% of NSRF • From 8 OPs • Directly: 4 Regional OPs (ERDF), Social infra OP (ERDF), Social renewal OP (ESF) • Indirectly: State reform OP (ESF), Implementation OP (CF) • Allocation to each micro-region, 5-15 meur (based on No of population and settlements) – difference compared to comprehensive approach • Coordination • No formal power • Informal organisational and personal power, coordination unit as all OP MAs in National Development Agency – difference compared to comprehensive approach • Challenges • Lack of support from OP MAs (allocation, specific conditions) • Time

  10. Per capita funding of least developed micro-regions

  11. Per capita funding of least developed micro-regions

  12. Per capita funding of least developed micro-regions

  13. Equal opportunities guarantees • Tools • Planning, project generation • Roma inclusion among main objectives of the programme • Involvement of local Roma leaders • Involvement of equal opportunities experts, commissioned by the coordination unit • Mapping of segregated areas, preparation of equal opportunities analysis and plans • Initial project selection • Equal opportunities among main criteria of assessment of plans and project ideas • Involvement of equal opportunities experts • 2 weakest plans sent back for revision • A number of projects selected from reserve list • Project preparation • Initial project selection with draft project ideas (3 pages each) • Specific conditions for project selection • Cooperation with MtM in project preparation • Results • Intervention does not increase internal differences in any micro-region, decreases internal differences in 1/3 of the micro-regions • Around 40 meur, 13% with direct Roma inclusion or equal opportunities impact

  14. Thanks for your attention http://mtm.osi.hu Where the Paved Road Ends akullmann@osi.hu

More Related