220 likes | 341 Views
Poverty overshadowed : the Belgian case. European sociale conference Workshop on national reform programs Brussels, 19th of September 2011. Chris Serroyen – Head research department Christian Trade Union Confederation of Belgium. OUTLINE Social and economic situation in Belgium
E N D
Poverty overshadowed: the Belgian case European sociale conference Workshop onnational reform programs Brussels, 19th of September 2011 Chris Serroyen – Head research department Christian Trade Union Confederation of Belgium
OUTLINE Social and economic situation in Belgium Preparation of the national reform program National program European recommendations Further debate
Social and economic situation AlsoBelgium was severely hit by the finincialmarkets Buteffectsonlabormarkets and society weremoderated: • automaticstabilizers: indexation, minimum wages, employmentprotection, temporayunemployment blue collarworkers, progressivetaxes, … • centralagreement 2009-2010: indexation + 250 euro for employees; realincreasesforsocialbenefits
Social and economic situation • recovery plan + new crisis measures (esp. temporaryunemploymentfor white collarworkers) • fiscalpathway to reduce deficit/debt (zero deficit in 2015) postponedpainfulmeasures to 2012-2015 Sooner exit out of the crisis: economic growth since 2008 stronger than in Germany: • 2011 2.4% • 2012 1.6% (?)
Social and economic situation Unemployment (Eurostat) • Belgium: 7.5% • Germany: 6.1% • France: 9.9% • Netherlands: 4.3% • EU27: 9.5% • EU15 (Eurozone): 9.5%
Social and economic situation Poverty and exclusion (SILC)
Social and economic situation Concentration of poverty
Social and economic situation Income inequality Statistical problems: • federal administration: worsening (based on fiscal data) • OECD: improving (manipulation of data)
Preparation EU 2020 Three official contacts (preparation of the draft, preparation of the finalprogramm, final programma), with: • National LabourCouncil • Central EconomicCouncil • FederalCouncilforSustainableDevelopment
Preparation EU 2020 Formalexercise, without realinteraction! Involvementanti-povertyorganizations and social partners departmentSocialEmancipation Problems: • difficultcooperationwithRegions and Communities (disturbedby the politicaltensions) • caretakergovernment (norealcommitmentspossible)
Preparation EU 2020 Platform text civil society (on the initiative of ACV/CSC and BAPN) Highlights (in general) • balanced objectives • precise, unambiguous objectives • not only objectives, but also tools/actions • not only objectives for 2020, but also intermediate objectives • regional objectives • additional objectives for each main objective
Preparation EU 2020 Highlights (concerning poverty and exclusion): • 380.000 (= reduction with 17%) as an absolute minimum • additional objectives: • administration: child poverty, debt problems, households without work • platform: inequality (Gini), income poverty , working poor, energy precariousness • social policy is more than poverty reduction • maintaining open coordination method for social policy
Preparation EU 2020 National program
Preparation EU 2020 Remarks: • 17.3 %-target for poverty and exclusion is rather ambitious: other countries don’t have a general target or have weaker targets (from CZ = 1.9% toFI = 16.5%); exception: LT: 18.3% • additional objectives administration: postponed • additional objectives platform: no response • no actions • quid regional and intermediate targets?
EU recommendations • accelerate correction of fiscal deficit (below 3% in 2012), mainly on expenditure side • preventing early exit of labor market • link statutory retirement age to life expectancy • finalize restructuring of banks • reform the system of wage bargaining and indexation
EU recommendations 6. reduction high tax and social security for the low paid • shift tax burden from labor to consumption + more environmental friendly taxation$ • target measures at older workers and vulnerable groups • boost competition
Fiscal policy (announcements) Proposals for a new federal government (Di Rupo) • preventing early exit • lowering unemployment benefits for long term unemployed (minimum lower than European poverty thresholds)
Fiscal policy (announcements) • less assimilated periods for pensions • less budget (60%) for the bi-annual improvements of social benefitsAt the other hand: new taxes, esp. on capital (incomes)
Further approach ACV/CSC • no opposition to the fiscal pathway (3% in 2012 and zero deficit in 2015) • shared responsibility of all policy levels • first and foremost deficit reduction at the income side
Further approach • strongest shoulders – strongest efforts • protection of the weakest (no reduction of social benefits) • reduction of poverty ànd inequality as a first priority
The worst has yet to come? • turbulences on financial markets • economic governance: sixpack, scoreboard, dominance of Ecofin • further concretization of “flexicurity” and trend to more precarious work • weakening of the open method of coordination (or concentration on poverty reduction?) • growing pressure on national wage standards (esp. for foreign workers/companies) • uncontrolled increase of “social fraud”