1 / 53

The Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium

The Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. Using the Individual Contributor and Reviewer Report. Agenda. Log into the Digital Library and navigate to the report. Select an SNE member and run a report. Understand the results displayed in each section of the report.

nat
Download Presentation

The Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Using the Individual Contributor and Reviewer Report

  2. Agenda • Log into the Digital Library and navigate to the report. • Select an SNE member and run a report. • Understand the results displayed in each section of the report.

  3. www.smarterbalancedlibrary.org

  4. Logging into the Digital Library

  5. Navigating to the Individual Contributor and Reviewer Report

  6. Running a Report – Default Settings

  7. Running a Report – Choose a Time Period

  8. Running a Report for SNE Gabe Kotter

  9. Three Sections – SNE Profile Information

  10. Three Sections – Contributed Resources 0 2 Mathematics of Money Formative Assessment in Mathematics

  11. Three Sections – Resource Reviews

  12. Gabe’s SNE Profile

  13. Contributed Resources 0 2 Mathematics of Money Test Resource 1 Formative Assessment in Mathematics

  14. Understanding Contribution Information 0 2 The Resources Contributed metric displays the number of resources that Gabe has submitted for review.

  15. Understanding Contribution Information 0 2 The Contributed Resources Posted metric displays the number of resources that have passed the Quality Criteria review process and are currently posted to the Digital Library.

  16. Understanding Contribution Information 0 2 The Contributed Resources Posted with Distinction metric displays the number of resources that have passed the Quality Criteria review process and are currently posted to the Digital Library with distinction.

  17. Understanding Contribution Information 0 2 Mathematics of Money Formative Assessment in Mathematics

  18. Post Status

  19. Understanding Contribution Information 0 2 Mathematics of Money Formative Assessment in Mathematics

  20. Resource Reviews Tables 1 (25%) 3 (75%) 3 44%

  21. Understanding Review Information 3 (75%) 1 (25%)

  22. Understanding Review Information 3 (75%) 1 (25%) The Accepted Reviews column displays the number of resources that Gabe passed through the Gate-Keeping review, indicating they met all these criteria.

  23. Understanding Review Information 3 (75%) 1 (25%) The Returned Reviews column displays the number of resources that Gabe did not pass through the Gate-Keeping review, indicating they did not meet all these criteria.

  24. Understanding Review Information 3 (75%) 1 (25%) The Total Reviews column displays a sum of the Accepted Reviews and Returned Reviews.

  25. Understanding Review Information 3 (75%) 1 (25%)

  26. Understanding Review Information

  27. Understanding Review Information 3 (75%) 1 (25%)

  28. Understanding Reviewer Information 1 (25%) 3 (75%) 3 44%

  29. Understanding Reviewer Information 3 44% The Reviews in Progress column displays the number of resources for which Gabe is currently conducting Quality Criteria Reviews.

  30. Understanding Reviewer Information 3 44% The Completed Reviews column displays the number of resources for which Gabe has completed Quality Criteria Reviews.

  31. Understanding Reviewer Information 3 44% The Average Consistency Rate for All Completed Reviews columnshows the average recommendation consistency rate for all resources reviewed in the selected time period.

  32. Understanding Reviewer Information

  33. Understanding Reviewer Information 3 44%

  34. Understanding Reviewer Information

  35. Understanding Reviewer Information R+ (Recommend with Distinction) R (Recommend) R- (Recommend with Revisions) NR (Do Not Recommend)

  36. Understanding Reviewer Information

  37. Consistency Rate Calculation Example Do Not Recommend (NR) Recommend with Revisions (R-) Recommend with Distinction (R+) Recommend (R) Maria Gabe Tony

  38. Consistency Rate Calculation Example Do Not Recommend (NR) Recommend with Revisions (R-) Recommend with Distinction (R+) Recommend (R) R- = 2 NR = 1 R = 3 R + = 4 Numerical Values Do Not Recommend (NR) = 1 Recommend with Revisions (R-) = 2 Recommend (R) = 3 Recommend with Distinction (R+) = 4 Maria Gabe Tony

  39. Consistency Rate Calculation Example Difference of 2 Difference of 1 Do Not Recommend (NR) Recommend with Revisions (R-) Recommend with Distinction (R+) Recommend (R) R- = 2 NR = 1 R = 3 R + = 4 Numerical Values Do Not Recommend (NR) = 1 Recommend with Revisions (R-) = 2 Recommend (R) = 3 Recommend with Distinction (R+) = 4 Maria Gabe Tony

  40. Consistency Rate Calculation Example Difference of 2 Difference of 1 1 Do Not Recommend (NR) 2 Recommend with Revisions (R-) 4 Recommend with Distinction (R+) 3 Recommend (R) Maria Gabe Tony

  41. Consistency Rate Calculation ( ) Total Divergence from Other Reviewers 100% – Maximum Possible Divergence from Other Reviewers

  42. Consistency Rate Calculation ( ) Total Divergence from Other Reviewers = 3 100% – Maximum Possible Divergence from Other Reviewers = 6 = 50%

  43. Consistency Rate

  44. Understanding Reviewer Information

  45. Understanding Reviewer Information

  46. Understanding Reviewer Information

  47. Understanding Reviewer Information

  48. Looking at SNE Reviewers’ Comments

  49. Looking at SNE Reviewers’ Comments

  50. Looking at SNE Reviewers’ Comments

More Related